All posts
New post548 posts in the last 30 days
I have an extension on my browser called DarkReader which basically turns every white color to black to minimize eye strain. It basically acts as a universal "dark mode". Would the proctors allow me to use this?
HI ya'll I was wondering if anyone is from the LA area or from the SFV area and is interested in organizing an in person study group. I noticed there are alot of people forming groups and I would be interested in studying with other individuals. I plan to take the LSAT in the Summer! Please let me know if any of you might be interested.
Will doing all the problem sets mess up my ability to take the practice LSATs? If anyone here did all the problem sets and then encountered the same questions in the LSAT, please let me know if it messed with your ability to accurately take the practice LSATs.
Thank you.
Hi guys I have been doing WAJ for the past couple of weeks. The way I did it was firstly copy&paste screenshot into my ipad notebook and then write explanations on it. Then I switched to make a drill of every question I missed or had doubt with and download that as a pdf. to write notes on. While I found this process to be smooth, I would rarely go back to these individual pdfs because the amount is getting big.
I wonder if I could somehow find a way to incorporate these notes into one document? I am thinking about perhaps doing an excel, but because I would like the stimulus included, I don't wanna do any extra, unnecessary work by somehow copy&pasting or screenshooting into excel; I already don't have enough time to actually practice because I have been spending so much time on BRing and reviewing wrong questions.
Thanks!
Hey everyone,
Due to illness, we will have to cancel today's Sufficient Assumption Analysis with Henry. Join the class again on Tuesday to continue the discussion on assumption and principle questions!
When answering the prompt, should you introduce the topic as though you are speaking to someone who doesn't know anything about the topic or as a response to a question? In other words, should you introduce the options at the beginning of the essay or just start with the answer?
Anyone have a good way to explain this question?
Hello, I just finished taking the September exam. However when I was I taking the exam, I had really bad noise disruptions. Would I be eligible to file a complaint? Or could you advice me on what to do?
Hello everyone. I have some questions regarding when and how to explain a GPA below a school’s median.
Essentially, I was majoring in Biology during my freshman year of college which was something kinda pushed onto me by my parents and not something I wanted to pursue. In addition to this, I moved houses during my very first semester of college and COVID hit during the middle of my second semester. After performing poorly these first 2 semester in college I decided to switch majors to Psychology and went on to earn an A in every single class I took from there until I graduated. Unfortunately, the failing grades I earned those semesters are counted by the LSAC’s cumulative GPA despite me graduating Summa Cum Laude with a 3.98 GPA. This brings my LSAC GPA to a 3.45. I know, yikes.
Is this something worth writing an addendum for? How will law school view me switching majors and my drastic change in grades?
In another discussion post about this question (the only other post about this question), one of the responses stated:
the crux of the argument lies in the second part of the second sentence where the author makes an explicit attempt at underlining the underlying logic: "but the absence of sightings cannot prove that it does not (exist)".
In lawgic that's: if there's absence, then we cannot prove non-existence.
Absence --> /prove
In order to weaken the argument, we need to find something that's loosely along the lines of: if there's absence, then that might actually mean non-existence.
(E) encapsulates this best.
But his underlying logic doesn't really make sense to me. If Absence of sightings -> cannot prove yeti does not exist, then the contrapositive is: prove yeti does not exist -> some sightings. The contrapositive doesn't make intuitive sense. If we prove that the yeti does not exist, then there must be some sightings of the yeti? That sounds like the complete opposite of what is necessary to prove something does not exist.
How does answer choice E weaken the argument? Is focusing on the underlying logic in the final sentence the best way to approach this question?
Someone please help m3 step by step
Can someone explain answer choice E?
Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question"
Hi there,
I am officially done with my lsat journey and looking to pass on my LSAT prep materials to anyone here (Los Angeles Area) who would like them. They are preloved and do have highlighting and writing in them.
If interested just let me know. Not looking to sell. Will be asked to be picked up as shipping would be expensive. Just looking to pass them on.
Here is the list below of what I have:
Powerscore Logic Game Bible
Powerscore Logic Game Bible workbook
Powerscore Reading Comprehension Bible
Powerscore Reading Comprehension workbook
Powerscore Logical Reasoning Bible
Powerscore Logical Reasoning workbook
LSAT Reading comprehension Manhattan Prep
LSAT 5lb book of Practice Drills
The LSAT TRAINER
The Fox Lsat Logic Games playbook
The loophole in LSAT logical reasoning
Fox Logical Reasoning Encyclopedia
PREPTESTS
Official LSAT Superprep
Volume VI
Volume V
No specifics about the test, just a general question regarding experimental sections. Are experimental sections used multiple times in different years? For example, if a section was included in an administration last year or 2 years ago etc., would its inclusion in a current administration mean it was experimental previously but is now the graded section OR would it be experimental again?
Has anyone ever gotten an exception to the three test per year rule and took it a fourth time?
Can we take a preptest again if we've already done so, and if so, how do we do that? Also, can we do the preptest untimed? I understand we do that during the blind review, but can we chose to change the time
Hi!
What I'm offering:
to help you out with LR questions either
Hi 7Sagers,
I am a low-income, first generation (citizen and college student), Cuban-American woman. Does this count as URM? I have read in several places that Hispanic URMS are only counted as Mexican and Puerto Rican.
Thank you!
I am trying to set up drills, but when there are fewer questions remaining than any of the number of question increment choices, I'm getting an error message for creating drills.
E.g. I have 4 questions left in the "Let Virtual Tutor Pick" logical reasoning section, but since the lowest increment of # of questions is 5, I get the following message: "Sorry, we were not able to create a drill based on your criteria. Please try again."
#help
Hi all -
I started my course of study focusing pretty much exclusively on LGs (my first PT was a 159, -4 RC, -13 LG, -avg 5.5 on LR, so the what needed improving seemed clear) and am now in a place where I'm pretty happy with them.
The problem is now LR. On average I'm still -3 or -4 per section, and I just can't seem to crack the most difficult questions. Get them wrong ~50% of the time on BR, get them wrong in the little bit of time I have to check my answers in section.
So - any tips or strategies for approaching difficult (4 or 5 pip) LRs? Thanks in advance!
Hey everyone! Check out this week's newsletter for some tips on improving your Wrong Answer journal, plus a link to our webinar on the same topic: https://7sage.substack.com/p/wrong-answer-journals-and-you?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
My November Lsat score was 157 (did not expect to get this). This would put me at 65 percentile.
What do you guys think my chances for Ontario schools are? Given the smaller applicant pool this year.
Ive applied to Windsor dual, Queens, Western, Osgoode, Ryerson(TMU), Ottawa.
Personally I think id be good for Windsor and Western maybe.
For anyone interested in a LSAT Study group for either the November or January dates, we are going to be meeting on Thursday 10/13 at 7pm EST to discuss scheduling. So far it seems as if evening meetings are preferable. Message me for the zoom link if interested
Episode #89 is here!
https://classic.7sage.com/podcast-episode-89-david-tajira-jake-and-ben-talk-about-deferrals/
Subscribe to our podcast:
I do not understand why the answer to this question is D and not A- isn't Greenwall providing an assumption instead of evidence?
Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question"