Looking to study in Riverside IE area. Hoping to take the June,2024 test.

Currently testing at 157-161 and hoping to break into 170.

I score 91%-100% in LG, 80% in LR, and 59% on RC

Ideally would like a partner who does well in RC since I am absolutly trash at RC.

Can complete blind reviews and time practice test together. Present topics to each other to show mastery.

I nearly completed the Blueprint course [A different course], but just started 7 Sage and I'm just 10% done with LR.

When will LSAC release fall LSAT dates?

Hey all.

I'm looking to start a study group or be a study partner in the SLC/Provo area.

Currently, I am scoring around 15high 16low and am drilling LG like crazy. I will be taking the LSAT in June, but I'm considering an April test as well. This will mostly be for accountability purposes and surrounding ourselves with likeminded people. I think we can also support each other in our admissions efforts when the time comes.

Message me on here so we can exchange information.

Hello. I am based in Columbus, OH and I plan on taking the LSAT on August 2024 (I know registration hasn't opened yet). I would love to join any study group (remote or in person). I would also love to receive some tips on how to study for the LSAT and get a high score within six months.

Thank you in advance.

Is it possible to create a prep test for the new format? Right now I cannot simulate a real test environment.

hi! I am taking the April LSAT and probably June as well. I am in Huntsville, AL, and it would be awesome to find someone around the same area to study with, but I am totally open to doing zoom from anyone, anywhere! I'm currently a rising senior in college and work part time, so some days it's hard to stay motivated. I am sitting at a 151 currently, trying to break into the 160s. I have went up from a 137 diagnostic in November-ish, so I am feeling like I will make it to my goal score by April. I struggle the most in RC, I'm pretty okay at LR, and Games I've gotten pretty good at, besides the miscellaneous and sometimes In/Outs.

Admin Note: We recommend that you do not to post your email or phone number publicly. Spam bots might pick up your email & number and you'll get spam. If you want to share contact info, you can use a private message.

Doesn’t the right answer [E] confuse necessary for sufficient?! Maria satisfies both of the necessary conditions but that doesn’t make the sufficient condition (being eligible) trigger. If we can't conclude that she's eligible JUST from satisfying the two necessary conditions, then how can we say that she should be granted leave? I thought that was the "oldest mistake in the book." Here's how I diagrammed:

Eligible for leave -> applied at least three months before leave period starts and have one year of paid employment

Eligible for leave -> granted leave

Doesn't [D] just strengthen the premise that scholars are more likely to study successful businesses than unsuccessful businesses? Can someone explain to me why it's right? It doesn't seem to strengthen the support that being more likely to study successful businesses -> overestimating successes of past businesses.

I chose [E] because it seemed to directly relate to the support. Just because scholar are more likely to study successful businesses doesn't mean that they're overestimating the successes of past businesses... what if they're also including setbacks that those successful businesses had along the way? [E] seems to guard against this potential weakness by saying that historical records actually don't allow historians to infer those setbacks. Why is [E] wrong?!

m

Hey 7Sagers,

I'm happy to announce the launch of our Online LSAT Fundamentals Class, which will run on Mondays from 6:00–9:00 ET, starting March 18.

This 12-week class is led by a top-scoring 7Sage instructor. Our classes offer structured guidance from an expert and a chance to build community with fellow 7Sagers. Our virtual classes come with a free three months of 7Sage Core + Live so that you can take advantage of all our digital resources alongside the class's custom program. You can reserve your spot at our special discounted price of $599 here: https://classic.7sage.com/in-person-classes/.

is it possible to have text to speech enabled on 7sage? i would like to that esp for rc passages

What is the difference in this question between what is "inherently fair" and what "society deems correct"?

Hopefully it's ok to post this here. I just want to let aspiring black lawyers (or anybody else at a disadvantage due to socioeconomic circumstances), that there is an alternative to the LSAT. It's called the JD Next. It will test your actually ability to understand the law, and give you a fair chance at getting into law school- unlike the LSAT. Google it. Registration is open now!

For drilling questions they really need to remove the checkmark from automatically completing the drill. I've clicked the checkmark multiple times and have ended up ending my drill wayy too early.

Please add an additional step in order to make sure the quiz is submitted, thank you!

Hi everyone. I'm currently scheduled for the April 2024 LSAT administration but I want to push it back to August '24 to avoid the Logic Games section and to give myself more time to utilize 7Sage to prepare for the test. My issue is that the registration isn't currently open and from previous years it looks like you can't register until May for the August test. If that's true, I'll be in a pickle because the deadline to change my test date free of charge is at the end of this month, as well as the fact that I'm scheduled for April but the sign-up wouldn't be until May so I'd be forced into withdrawing my registration for the LSAT altogether by February 29th and then signing up for the August LSAT when it opens. I'm wondering if it could be an option to switch dates to the June test then switch to the August date when registration opens without incurring a penalty/paying more as a result of pushing my test date. Does anyone have any advice or insight into this matter that could be helpful for my situation? Additionally, I couldn't find Ithaca, NY as a test administration site on the LSAC website. Ithaca College and Cornell used to administer the LSAT so I'm curious if they're no longer offering it there and not sure who to contact for that information. Many thanks in advance for any advice/insight!

Hello- I am wanting to retake some of the practice tests because I am ahead of schedule for my test date. How can I go back and retake/delete the test I have previously taken?

Does anyone want to meet and study the LSAT together? I come from Songdo, Incheon and can meet both weekdays and weekends

I am registered for the February test, but I am fine with my January score and it is above the median for the school I want to go to. This was the only time I took the test and I know it’s recommended to take it twice, but I feel like it’s getting too late into the application cycle to wait for February and not have a complete application until March to apply with. For reference my Jan score was 64 percentile (15high) and 2 points higher than my target school’s median and my GPA is slightly above their median as well. Thanks in advance!

Hi there! I live in West Houston but would be okay to meet closer to Downtown if anyone in Houston wants to be LSAT study/accountability buddies.

Hi! I'm interested in putting together a study group for the April 2024 LSAT (if you're taking the test earlier or later, still feel free to hop on!), details below.

I'm currently scoring: 175-179

My planned test date: April 2024

My goals for this group are: Get together a regularly meeting group to review practice sections and tests, go over answer choices, and cement understanding.

We'll focus on: Solidifying strategies for RC and LR is my current goal, but any review and reenforcement would be helpful.

When we'll meet and what we'll do: TBD

How to join: comment here and I'll DM you, or DM me your email and I'll make an email list to send to everyone with a link to vote on meeting times. Looking for once or twice a week meetings :)

Thanks for reading, good luck to everyone!

🔢 I'm currently scoring: 155-160

📆 My planned test date: June 2024, potentially taking again August 2024

📈 To study, I have been: Haven't studied for the LSAT in a while, but want to take it before they remove logic games!

🔑 My goals for this group are: Hold each other accountable, help high scorers cement understanding by helping lower scorers, & schedule time to take PTs, also networking with other legal professionals.

🔍 We'll focus on: Getting Logic Games down to -1/0 is my personal goal.

👥 Study Group Name: TBD

📚 When we'll meet and what we'll do: TBD

✅ How to join: Comment below with your username in your preferred group chat system. We'll make a group chat in the preferred app :)

I've had kind of a rough history with the LSAT. My first exam was in Jan 2021. In 2023, I took the exam 3 times (Jan, Aug, October) and then took it in January of 2024. Long story short, I really pressured myself to get a great score for the 2023 cycle and it backfired on me. For the Jan 2024 exam, I received some bad news about my grandma concerning her health before my exam and it severely impacted my performance.

I submitted an appeal to LSAC to register for the August 2024 exam, but they aren't reviewing appeals for the 2024-2025 cycle until registration for the August exam opens. Do I have a chance at getting my appeal approved?

Could anyone kindly give me some advice? My LSAT score is one point lower than the last time. This is my second LSAT taking, and I plan not to take LSAT in the future. So should I cancel my score this time or should I keep it?

Hi,

Since this has no video explanation for it, I want to know whether I fell in line with the rest when I reached that conclusion. In this question, the author argues that butter manufacturers should be allowed to call their products "Can't believe it's not butter or Skim fat butter" to ward off any negative nuances from the term "Imitation butter". This person cites two reasons to back up one's allegation. A) People should be fostered to consume more low fat butter products because of their health concerns, arising from a high cholesterol level. B) This hostile naming like Knock-off/Ersatz could stave potential consumers off from those well-intentioned products owing to their aversion to the names. In that way, the industry could push people to indulge in more butterfat which could pose a threat to their health (esp. cardiovascular). In order to weaken this assertion, I thought it would be better off for me to claim that this aversion could beget more positive results healthwise for those buyers in the market. What if they, finding those suggestive names unbearably repulsive, decided to find the authentic low fat butter products which significantly slashed the fat content? For instance, they would rather find a real McCoy low fat butter, projecting an image of authenticity,instead of phonier butter substitutes, which happened to have less butterfat in it? People who voted for Trump would rather turn to him to gratify their desires, whatever they might be, in lieu of settling down for his miniature, Ron DeSantis, emulating his extreme creeds. I just thought that it was important for me to tackle the author's point that the negative naming could take a toll on public health because it deters people from purchasing the imitation butter which is healthier for them thanks to the low fat content in comparison with the regular ones. Thus, one of the ramifications was supposed to bear the unexpected consequence that made everyone more robust and hale: cutting off the consumption of butterfat more noticeably than what was expected from the fake butter. What are your thoughts on this? I would like to hear from other would-be legal minds. Thanks!

I’m trying to understand the methodology of doing a practice set of let’s say 2 games, then doing them the best you can , then watching the video for explanation. I just feel like I’m doing the same thing of struggling through a game , then watching the video , doing the game over and over again until I get all the inferences. But then I try a new set and I feel like I either do ok or I’m back to struggling. I’ve done so much practice I’m sure I still I haven’t seen all the types of games there are? Sometimes the way the games are worded confuses me where I take extra time upfront to understand the rules so I can draw it correctly. I’m at a standstill at this point and I want to get it right. :/