Was wondering if anyone had advice for how I can help this problem. I've been studying consistently since June, and have been plateauing on scores of around 155. However, my blind reviews have been going up, to where I'm now getting 170+ but not seeing those actual score changes on the timed version? Does anyone have advice on how to fix it? Is it just more practice with doing timing? I noticed one thing that I have trouble with is more of the logic ones like SA's, NA's, Mbt, etc where I get them wrong on the timed tests but get them right on blind review when I have time to work through them.

hey guys!! I haven't submitted my writing portion for the August LSAT yet, and I was wondering if anyone knows when the last date we can submit it by is? I have heard you can submit it after you have taken the test so I decided to do that instead

Anyone in the Mississauga/Toronto area looking for a study parter or interested in starting a study group?

@JY Please add practice tests 1-18 onto this site. There are very limited amounts of practice tests and I want to use all of them. I love 7sage btw its the best (but could be much better with the prep tests that are not included in the re-mapping that is now know as PT 101-158)

163 lsat 3.8 gpa. Applied pretty late got waitlisted into Chapman, LMU, UC Irvine. Got admission with 200k from southwestern. Obviously southwestern is lower ranked. Should I just go to southwestern or try again next cycle earlier?

What's different about the new site?

The new site is a big glow-up:

- A cleaner design

- More and better explanations

- Improved drill performance tracking

- Smartererer analytics

- Streamlined, mobile-friendly interface

- And countless small improvements

Is that what "glow-up" means? I don't know but the new site is kickass and super user-friendly. Explore!

Yeah, no thanks. I'd rather stick with what I know.

Sure thing. If you enjoyed classic 7Sage, keep using it at classic.7sage.com. It'll be around until at least early 2026. But the new site has many improvements (glow-ups, some might say)—so you can switch whenever you're ready.

Alright, fine how can I transfer my account to the new site?

Well, you can't. But you can sign up for a new account on the new site.

And if you have an existing paid account on classic 7Sage, you can transfer your billing to the new site. Make sure to use the SAME EMAIL as you used on the classic 7Sage. That will unlock the same subscription tier on this new site for you. You can do that here: https://7sage.com/users/settings/billing

If that doesn't work, reach out to studentservice@7sage.com. We're always happy to help.

I was charged again when transferring billing—why you sneaky greedy mofos?

What transferring billing does is to push back the next date on which you get billed again. You get charged a prorated fee based on how far back the next billing date gets pushed.

Let's pretend you last paid on June 6. That would means that you were paid up through July 6 (a month). If you transfer today, say June 25, the next date that you'll get billed again is July 25.

The difference between July 6 (original next billing date) and July 25 (new next billing date) is the extra days that the prorated fee is for.

But we are also sneaky and greedy.

Will my progress and data transfer from classic 7Sage?

Not automatically (yet). Your data (like course progress, notes, and PrepTest results) won't transfer to the new site since the two platforms aren't compatible. However, you can manually import your PrepTest scores here: https://new.7sage.com/users/settings/practice/import/manual

We're working on automatic imports for PrepTests and Drills—stay tuned!

Do I lose access to classic 7Sage if I transfer?

Nope! You can access both.

How can I see my billing info?

- If you transferred to the new site, you'll see your billing details under 7sage.com/settings/billing

- If you haven't transferred yet, your billing is still managed on the classic site: https://classic.7sage.com

Is there an app?

The old 7Sage app is no longer supported. But good news—the new site is fully mobile-friendly! Just open 7sage.com in your mobile browser (Chrome, Safari, etc.).

Is there a Study Schedule on the new site

Not yet. The study schedule is still under development. We expect a late July / early August release.

Like many, this is one of my weaker points. It's been a focus throughout my studies and I feel like I'm finally understanding and getting more accurate! I know how to recognize SA vs NA questions, but it's not making sense to me how these questions differ in the answer. For example: "Which one of the following is an assumption necessary for the critic's conclusion to be properly drawn?" I am able to bridge the gap and connect the points, which is getting me the correct answers, but I don't see the answer as a necessary. An example is PT 126 Section 1. The answer is connecting B to C. Then the conclusion is C to D. So how is B to C a necessary vs sufficient assumption? Maybe I'm getting too in my head about it and the focus on finding and filling the gap is all I need to really think about. But open to any thoughts! And not able to pay a tutor $1000 to explain this question to me 🤪

I’ve done a few prep tests, and my actual score usually ranges from 150 to 160. My blind review score, though, is around 170. When I do timed drills, especially for four-star and five-star questions, I usually get only a few right or most of them wrong. But during blind review, I get almost all of them right, or sometimes just one wrong.

At this point, I know my issue isn’t comprehension. It’s timing.

If I focus on finishing within the time limit, I make dumb mistakes. But if I focus on accuracy, I often spend too much time on certain questions. Sometimes it’s because I’m unsure about an answer that’s actually correct, and other times I just can’t finish all the questions.

Do you have any strategies? I understand that comprehension is the key to improving speed, and I’ve been working on that for months. I see improvement only in blind review or with the easier one- and two-star ones and no major improvement in how quickly I can get through the harder questions during timed sections.

Hey guys, if anyone is taking the LSAT soon and is from Ottawa, let me know and we can study together. We locked in.

Hi everyone! I have made some progress on my LSAT score. I have been scoring low 160 and then high 160 or over 170 in the blind review. Any tips on closing this gap? The fundamentals are there it seems but the timing gets me I guess.

I am a visual learner and I am really struggling on how to study for the LSAT. I'm usually a flashcard person but I've been told that's not a good way to study for this test. I have looked on youtube, tiktok, chatgbt, I can't find any advice on how to approach studying for the LSAT as a visual learner. Anyone have any tips or tricks?

Dropping the link to the new East-Coast co-working/accountability discord. We have some drop-in blocks on the server currently for 9:30A and 6:00P every weekday for anyone that wants to drop in for a while for accountability or co-work (these times can be adjusted if there are blocks that work better for more people). Feel free to drop by! https://discord.gg/yERJ8qWx

Hey guys!! I'm looking for a study buddy/ accountability partner. I'm taking the LSAT in October and trying to apply to TTU law. I hope all of you guys get a 175 or higher!!!

I know on the old site there is the option to set your own study schedule, but it's not currently available on here! I'm just going back and forth between the old and new site to mark off my completed curriculm sections, but is there any plans for the feature to be added here soon?

Hi,

I'm located in MD. I just started studying for the LSAT and would love to start a virtual study group if anyone is interested.

Thanks

Hey all! I'm preparing for my LSAT in October and would like to build a study group. I'm based in SE PA, near York, Harrisburg, and Lancaster. Anyone interested?

Hi! My question is about the Question #5 on Skill Builder - Negation 3 in the Foundations module----

The original sentence is: "Chess is the most appropriate analogy to reporting on political campaigns."

I understand that a proper negation would be something like: "Either something else is a more appropriate analogy for reporting on political campaigns than chess is, or something else ties with chess as being the most appropriate." or "It is not the case that chess is the most appropriate analogy to reporting on political campaigns."

However, I was wondering why wouldn't a simpler negation like "Chess is not the most appropriate analogy to reporting on political campaigns" be sufficient? Is there a meaningful difference between the two, or do they functionally mean the same thing in formal logic?

Thank you so much for your time and help!

Are the analytics that prioritize by tags made only from data from PTs, not including drills or sections? I think it would be nice to see the analytics that include how I did at least in timed sections if not timed drills in addition to the PTs cause I don't really want to be taking a PT all the time to see which areas I should try to focus more of my attention on.

If these are really only made with solely PT data, I feel like the lack of PTs I've taken so far is skewing my analytics. However, I don't want to be blazing through all of the PTs and burn out mentally to get a better sample of how I'm doing.

The analytics feature is super cool and useful for sure, but I think it would be a nice feature to at least add a filter where I could toggle to add more data into these analytics with questions from drills/sections if I wanted to!

I often click on the "high priority" question types for logical reasoning, and I'll do a drill of maybe 10 "Must be true" questions, but the system doesn't include any of my drilled questions into the data for how I am performing on those questions. This leaves me a little confused about what the "personalized drilling" is doing if it is not connected to analytics. I'm using new 7sage if that helps.

I just got done taking the LSAT at an in person test center and it was so loud. I had the headphones on but the proctors sat on the other side of a glass window talking about their lives almost the entire test so loudly that I could barely think. I took the test at a center because of the horror stories I've heard of online tests. If I knew it was going to be so loud I would have just taken it at home and asked my family to get out of the house for two hours. If I file a complaint do I have a chance at getting this score canceled and getting a retake? Or am I being ridiculous here?

hey there im new one here if there's an actve group on whatsapp or instagram could you please share the invite link THANK YOU

Hi! I found that I am very weak in the more difficult questions involving conditional and casual reasoning. Where can I look for study material/ how can I improve my understanding to get more effective at answering these question types?

I am aiming for a 165 on August/September LSAT, I've been sitting in the low 160s, but have made massive gains in LR. For example, I just had my best LR section today, scoring a -2 on a tough (3 star difficulty) PT section. To couple that, I've been trying to get my LR down to the -3/4 range to give myself more wiggle room on RC. For some reason RC has just not improved, if any maybe become worse. I just did a 15 question drill, on 2 tough art/spotlight passages (my 2 worst by far) and got 8/15 wrong. (Lol) What am I doing wrong with RC??? I feel like a lot of the time I read the tough passages I kind of just have no idea what the fuck is going on, get to the questions and try to fill in the gaps with my wrong ACs, and kinda exacerbate my passage ignorance.

Hi all! I’ve noticed a pattern while studying LR — it’s not specific question types that trip me up, but rather the hardest questions at the end of the section (usually the last 6–8). I tend to get those wrong, even when I do really well on the earlier ones. Any tips on how to get better at those tough, high-difficulty questions? Would love to hear what worked for you.

Are drills and practice sections available with the free subscription?