I think the error that author makes is false equation (population # = # of library users) but can someone explain answers (B) and (E) in further detail? Thanks in advance! :)

I feel like I've improved so much and will demolish this exam but on the same coin, what if i forget that ONE inference or what if i come across the easiest LG and just panic because the wording is weird? I know i can do this, I'm not going to take this test again! i just need a whole lot of prayers. Pleaseeeeee. Any prayers or advice would be helpful. Thank you:)

Hi Everyone,

Just starting to study brand new. Anyone interested in becoming my study buddy for accountability? I will be studying from 8:00pm to 1am central time, with 30 min break from 10:45PM to 11:15PM. I'm planning on taking the test in June. However, I can also be flexible. Let's do this together!

Hey! I’m about to do two hours of studying. Join so we can hold each other accountable.

Let me know if you’re interested, I’ll send a google link!

Like okay? Ms. LSAT? Like.. what's the deal?

I've been simping hard for you. ALL DAY. You're the first thing I think of when the sun shines; the last thing I think of when the sun's down. On my drive to work and back I'm listening to people praise you. Every conversation I have with friends or family revolves around you and our potential future together. Even now we're inseparable; we're literally always together!

We always have your favorites. Blaze pizza (Hawaiian style, don't @ us), Raising Canes', Chic-fil-A, Chipotle, Bossam, Pho, Halal Guys.. whatever you wanted we ate! (I'm actually lying. I always choose... but it's cuz you never tell me what you want (-.-'))

I remember when the 50s and 60s actually made me feel like the feelings were mutual.. My growth was exponential, and I started to envision a realistic future together. I even decided January 14th was the date where I'll truly and wholeheartedly... y'know? But DAMN.

PT 72 Passage 2... like that was "the easiest of the section" (?) JY King, pls. PLS. Section 2 and 3 - LR like.. I thought I knew you inside and out but I was so wrong. Game 4 - like okay? Like.. why you playing games?! I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT YOU asdfahsdkfja QUIT PLAYIN' WITH ME.

ANYWAY. Good luck to all the 7Sage preppers. Here's one of the most profound poems from one of the most intelligent and wise sages in our generation. I hope you find some inspiration from this mans! Let's just freaking do this!!

"It's about drive; it's about power.

We stay hungry; we devour.

Put in the work; Put in the hours.

Let's take what's ours."

Hi, i live in Wyoming and that is where I plan on applying to. I'm curious to know if there's anyone else on here who is applying to University of Wyoming Law?

Hi all, this may be silly but is it too late to submit law school apps? Things came up and I was unable to submit apps by late Nov/early Dec. As originally planned. I'm aiming to have everything in by Jan 1...is that too late in this competitive cycle?

We've updated our big law school info doc with the latest stats for every school, a year-over-year comparison of those stats, and more. Here's a video that walks you through it:

https://share.descript.com/view/3VVjK9zH2Ll

Here's the doc:

https://coda.io/@david-busis/7sage-law-school-list/medians-17

Hi all,

Neurotic question here: Just submitted a bunch of apps these past couple days. For those of us submitting now, are we at a considerable disadvantage to people who applied in Sept - Nov?

How do you read the passage for RC? What is helpful for you?

Also what are some common traps you have found in RC answer choices?

Hey all! I'm taking the exam this January and know scheduling is supposed to open up tomorrow, I remember in the past there was a glitch where students could book early.

Just wanted to check if there were any updates on that situation, I just want to get my fair chance by booking as soon as it opens!

Is this statement ever a possible answer? OR is this answer a self-contradictory statement.

"A factor that need not be present in order for a certain effect to arise may nonetheless be sufficient to produce that effect. "

Is this just saying it doesn't have to be sufficient but may nonetheless be sufficient...?

I'm just confused to this answer choice, what does this even mean?

Hello,

I am currently looking for a study buddy (Gangnam/Seocho).

I am aiming for either April or June lsat - if interested, please let me know!

For a principle question, let's say the stimulus was about a scenario and the correct answer choice was to identify the principle in that situation. Could the contrapositive be correct?

Ex: the principle describing the scenario is 'if you run a marathon, you will be tired'

In the answer choices, if one was 'if you're not tired, you didn't run a marathon,' would that be acceptable? Or does it have to be 'if you run a marathon, you will be tired'

Apologies if this is a dumb question!

when I take prep tests, should I be taking it as flex with 3 sections or with 4 because in the real test it will have the unscored 4th section? I know I'm only scored by 3 on the real so I don't want to inflate my score if the 4th preptest section helps me, but also want to build stamina by taking 4 sections

Hi everyone,

I'm about 5 months into intensive studying for the LSAT and am struggling to see big progress on my games section. This is pretty much the only section I've studied as I started off averaging -3/4 each on LR and RC so I decided to focus my effort on the one I struggle with.

I scored a 157 on the November LSAT after averaging 161 prior to it, and just hit my first 164 practice test the other day (could have been luck). Despite everything, I've still never cracked -8 on the games section. I try to foolproof every type of game but I'm starting to panic with my LSAT coming up in January and needing to get a minimum of 163 to be competitive for my law school choices.

If anyone has any advice on how to go from -8 to -3/2 in two weeks please share, it would be so incredibly helpful. Thanks so much!

Hi everyone,

I'm wondering if there is a cheat sheat that details all of the different question stems in LR and how to approach them (i.e., weakening questions = attack the support, necessary assumption = take the contrapositive of the ACs and see which one wrecks the argument, etc. etc.). Please let me know if something like this exists. I haven't touched anything LSAT-related since the June exam and I'm looking to jump back in. Thanks!

Any strategies/tips for improving?

How many weeks did it take you to see improvement whether you solely self-studied or did a combo of self-study + tutor (1-2 sessions) every week?

And on that note, can anyone recommend a tutor that helps you by listening to your reasoning (i.e., for eliminating A/C and picking the correct AC) and telling you where said reasoning is flawed?

For (A) to make sense, isn't it necessary that we need to assume that "informing people to make better choice" is journalism's only purpose?

Otherwise, say if journalism might have another purpose (say entertainment), gossip might fit such potential purpose. Hence, we couldn't be able to reasonbly conclude that gossip is sometimes included for nonjournalistic purpose.

Could anyone explain where my thought process went wrong? thanks.

Admin Note: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-76-section-2-question-15/

Hi everyone! I am registered for the January test. I made a mistake in my scheduling and did most of the newest RC sections in the first leg of my preparation. Now I'm left with unused sections from PTs 30-50s (and 6-7 latest PTs which I have saved for timed practice test runs). The only option I have for drilling is using the old test sections. I am constantly scoring -0 to -3 in these. Do these sections reflect a similar difficulty level as those of the modern tests or these sections are comparatively easier?

Any advice of improving RC score is also welcome. Thanks in advance!

Could anybody tell which section was repeated (unscored) in these tests? And were you able to identify it?

Currently averaging –2-3 on RC sections. Misses are confined almost exclusively to 4- and 5-level difficulty questions. Basics are on point, and I generally feel calm and composed during PTs.

Question: Is it worth going through RC sections in post-BR reviews, i.e., in review sessions 2-3 days after taking and BRing a PT? If so, advice on how to effectively conduct such review would be greatly appreciated.

For context, average score of 5 most recent PTs is a 173.

Are explanations available for 91 and 92 (particularly RC)? When I try to navigate to the explanations through the "Explanation Videos", I get "404 not found"

So I decided to take another year to do this again & aiming for June but after 9 months of doing nothing but work, study, repeat I think I burned myself out. Any advice for starting again? I don’t think studying 24/7 helped - it may have harmed actually. I’ve been trying to get back into studying the last couple weeks but have been unable to get myself to do it.

Hey folks, I'm going to be doing a PT this Saturday at 10 am CST. If you are taking PT's now, feel free to join in. We don't need to be working on the same test either.

Anyone interested?