Subscribe to the podcast:

Apple Podcasts | Spotify

Are these admissions tips common knowledge…or shocking revelation?

Jake is an old hand when it comes to dispensing pearls of law school admission wisdom. But Clayton is a relative newbie and was surprised to hear Jake’s answers to often-asked admissions questions.

In this episode, Clayton gets a chance to ask “say what?” about Jake’s admissions best practices.

They touch on vague statement prompts, whether optional really means optional, what’s so baffling about resumes, and much more.

Listen and subscribe:

Apple Podcasts | Spotify

In this episode, Bailey and Henry walk through the three habits that transformed their own RC performance and that they now teach to students aiming for 170+. You’ll learn how to orient yourself with the main point, recognize wrong answers immediately, and spot the key ideas that drive each passage. These are habits anyone can build with the right practice. Whether you’re rebuilding your RC foundation or fine-tuning for the next test, this episode will guide you step-by-step.

When blind reviewing a Preptest, it would be helpful to have the option to blind review and check answers after each section rather than having to complete all four sections before being able to see the answers. I sometimes can't get to blind reviewing the whole test in one day because of time constraints in my schedule, so by the time I've finished blind reviewing all four sections, a few days may have passed, and within those days the only type of studying I've done is redo-ing the questions without getting a chance to learn from the mistakes, and it's easier to forget why I made the decisions I did the more time has passed. For me, it's less important to see an "updated BR score" than it is to use the BR process for direct learning.

Does that make sense? Anyone else with limited time in their schedule feel like they might benefit from something like this? Also, my apologies if this functionality already exists and I don't know where to find it!

To J.Y. and team: thank you for constantly updating the platform. 7Sage has been a tremendous resource in my studying.

When in blind review mode, the "I" icon at the top tells you why the question was selected- changed answers multiple times, took longer than target time, answered incorrectly etc. I feel this gives information that can cause errors in the validity of your blind review score. Is there a way to hide the option of have those details available while doing the blind review? I don't want to know why the question was selected or even have the option of knowing why until after I have completed the review.

Thank you so much for taking our feedback!

Hi all,

I'm currently doing the drills for Logical Reasoning and am finding trouble locating the proper tag for the Role Questions (e.g., identify the role of sentence XY in the argument). There seems to be no specific tags for this type of question when creating the drill.

Is it possible there is another tag for the role questions?

Hi everyone! I'm a senior at Washington State and am taking the February, potentially postponed to April, LSAT. As a student with ADHD and dyslexia, I'd love to connect with other students sharing similar learning styles. This exam can feel quite daunting without a learning disability, so adding in that factor can really be discouraging, but I know it is not something that will hold me back from my success. Feel free to contact me on 7sage for my personal contact.

Anyone from the Ottawa area? I want to start studying with people.

Is PT131 on the harder side compared to other PTs?

What’s up, I’m building a tight, high-accountability LSAT study crew focused on LR + RC improvement. I’m testing Jan 10, but open to Jan/Feb/March test-takers who are consistent, serious, and want to grow.

About Me:

Current PT: ~148 and rising (LawHub/7Sage)

Strengths: breaking down logic in real time, mapping RC passages, live feedback

Weaknesses: timing, drilling key LR types

Schedule: rotating work shifts, but can do 4 sessions/week (mix of afternoons/evenings, can coordinate)

Looking for Partners Who:

Can commit to 4x/week, 1–1.5 hr sessions

Are comfortable thinking out loud, open to pushback, and want to get better (not just “be right”)

Know the basics (argument structure, major LR types, RC flow)

Want a small, consistent group (Houston area or virtual)

Session Format:

Quick warm-up

Timed LR/RC drill

Breakdown & live feedback

“Hot seat” — everyone explains their logic and gets real-time critique

DM Me With:

1. Your test date & PT range

2. Biggest LR/RC struggles

3. What you want from the group

4. What you bring (energy, structure, humor, whatever)

We’ll do a quick intro call, lock in core times, and get to work. Let’s break plateaus and get those scores up.

You can also DM me at Founder@TheNarrativeProjectHouston.onmicrosoft.com

Hello, Im unfortunately experiencing above mentioned error. I reached out to LSAC directly and they advised to reach out to 7Sage as they see matching email addresses. Could you please look into this? I do not recall having another 7sage account.

Just as the title says,

Not sure if this is already a feature but if you have accommodations the target time for questions should reflect that

I just scored a 178 on PT128.

Hey everyone!

I’ve recently started studying and have been following a pretty strict study schedule. I’m about five months out from my test date, and I’m wondering if this is a good time to start increasing the intensity of my studying, or if you’d recommend a different approach. There are so many drills and practice tests available, and I’m unsure whether I should save the drills for closer to the test date. Any advice given is super helpful! Thank you!

I just scored a 171 on PT127.

I'm taking the LSAT in January 2026 and plan to submit my application to all the law schools I'm interested in as soon as I get my score. Is it too late to apply to start in the fall of 2026? I'm in Florida, and a majority of the schools I want to go to have their priority deadlines by February-March 2026. Will I make it just in the nick of time?

I think dark mode is great. My only comment is that for videos like the study breaks or motivational breaks the lighting in the videos is off? The videos on lessons and explanations is fine because they have the black background but for the other videos I mentioned the lighting is off.

Hey y’all,

Just saw a post in the discussion section advertising a perfume brand? Almost certain the post was AI generated. Are there ways to report these posts or get rid of them?

Thank you!

Hi guys, just got my score hold lifted and I wanted to say thank you to 7sage for helping me with getting a 180. I started off with a pretty low diagnostic(165) and they were able to help me move up by 15 points!!!!!. Thanks to J.Y for the explanations.

I just scored a 180 on PT139.

Edit: I'm not currently taking on any more students. I will make an updated post when I have additional availability.

Hi everyone,

I'm offering affordable LSAT tutoring at $50/hour. I scored a 178 on the LSAT and have been working with a few students in all different score ranges. The LSAT is a test that largely depends on identifying patterns of reasoning and learning formal logic skills. I think this test is super learnable, but it takes a lot of focus to be able to identify the gaps in your reasoning that might be preventing you from improving your score. Through tutoring sessions, I would be happy to work with you to identify these reasoning gaps and help you reach your goal score.

I'm currently looking to take on 3 or 4 more students, so let me know if you're interested. I also offer discounted rates for students who might be interested in scheduling several hours of tutoring at a time.

I just scored a 177 on PT140.

Hi everyone — I’m hoping to get some advice about building stamina for the accommodated version of the LSAT.

I receive 50% extended time and stop-the-clock breaks, so my sections are 53 minutes each and the whole test ends up being about 4 hours. I’ve been taking full practice tests under realistic conditions, but I’m finding that my accuracy drops noticeably in the second half of the test. Even when I’m well-rested, I start to feel mentally drained after the second section, and my focus slips especially on LR and occasional RC passages.

I’ve been practicing with the same timing I’ll have on test day and taking the 10-minute breaks between sections, but I’m still struggling to maintain consistent performance across all four sections.

Has anyone found effective ways to build stamina specifically for an extended-time LSAT?

I’d love advice on:

• How to structure practice tests (e.g., whether to split sections or always do full-length)

• How to use the between-section breaks and stop-the-clock breaks strategically

• Whether to do “back-to-back section” stamina training on off days

• Any adjustments to study schedule that have helped others with 50% extra time

I’m seeing strong Blind Review scores (around 170 on my last PT), but my real-time performance drops by ~5–7 points, and I suspect stamina is a big part of it. Any tips or experiences would be super appreciated!

Would anyone be interested in a weekly study group in the NYC area in prep for the Jan LSAT? Virtual options are welcomed as well! I was thinking possibly two sessions per week (one in person and one via Zoom). Please reach out if interested:)

I'm taking the April LSAT, hopefully the last one I take. My applications don't close until July 31st, for the Fall 2026 cycle. Seems late, but I figured I should still apply late instead of not at all. I know if seats are slimming down, my chances are lower, but besides that, does it mean anything else applying late? What if I apply, don't get in, and apply early addmison 2027? Will that look bad for admisson committees?

I’ve been struggling with the harder Logical Reasoning questions that tend to appear near the end of the section, so I want to create targeted drills to improve. My plan is to build sets of five challenging LR questions— 1 SA/NA, 1 Parallel Flaw, 1 Weaken, 1 Must Be True, and 1 Flaw question—since these are the types I often see later in the section.

Is this an effective approach? Are these question types actually more common at the end of LR sections, or is their placement essentially random?