I got everything wrong on the three-question set. I don't know what I should to improve
Any help is appreciated
337 posts in the last 30 days
I got everything wrong on the three-question set. I don't know what I should to improve
Any help is appreciated
Hello, I just recently started studying for the lsat and am hoping to take the LSAT in February...
I started off at a 130 and am now at a 155 (which isn't the best I'm aware). throughout my time studying I found that i do better on preptests when I finish a question and then reveal the answer. also, I manage to do much better when i write every single thing out, but that takes a lot of time which i wont have during the real thing.
Has anyone gone through this? if so any advice would be great... my goal is to at least get a 170
Why do my drilling analytics (especially the drilling accuracy metric) only use questions I've "drilled" and not all of the questions I've answered throughout the core curriculum? Is there an advantage to this? And if not, is there a way for me to mass include all questions I answer in my drilling analytics without having to manually toggle on the below button for each individual question?
Okay I'm kind of new here. I did the intro test on this site. completed the 3 sections. IT said my score was "-X" and that's all. WTF does that mean. is that the total questions I got wrong? is that the amount of points deducted from a perfect score? there was absolutely no explanation or metric to understand exactly what that score means. can someone please advise?
At what point should I start taking practice tests regularly? I'm currently on week 6 of studying, in the "theory" phase of my study plan. Thank you for any insight.
hey guys , i need advice/help. I am studying by myself no tutor, i did my first ever practice test end of August and got a 138 then the next test i did was in october which was 135 and then a week ago 133 and then on that last one i blind reviewed a 150. Today i took a practice test untimed and got a 139 and am going to wait a day to blind review. Is this a normal process for some? I also didnt get 7sage till a week ago and it has way more helpful tools then the book i was using. I notice when i take the test i get stuck with having 2-3 answer choices and on my blind review i would choose the other answer choice i was stuck between. How do i break the cycle of getting the right answer the first time? thanks
Extremely frustrated! The LSAT has been a relatively long and stressful journey for me. My first 2 attempts I saw little improvement and scored in the mid 150s. But leading up to November, I was feeling great. My prep test range was 167-172! On test day, I felt fine not great. Nothing went especially wrong and I left the test feeling unsure but not like I melted down.
Got my score back and it was 159, just 2 points more than my last take and 8-13 points below my range. I clearly underperformed.
I’m now looking ahead to hopefully my last retake in January. Any advice on how to perform to my potential on test day? The biggest factor I can identify is taking it in person vs. replicating my PT experience remotely.
Anyone in San Antonio down to start an LSAT study group? I’m in the 160s right now, but totally open to people at any score level. Just want a consistent group to grind with.
Going to make a November LSAT chat here on 7Sage, comment if you'd like me to add you!
the following is from a flaw question on seven sage...
Theorist: To be capable of planned locomotion, an organism must be able both to form an internal representation of its environment and to send messages to its muscles to control movements. Such an organism must therefore have a central nervous system. Thus, an organism incapable of planned locomotion does not have a central nervous system.
Correct Answer
a
confuses a necessary condition for an organism's possessing a capacity with a sufficient one
My attempt to identify conditionals (May be False)
( Sufficient condition) be capable of planned locomotion. (Nessesary Condition indicated by must)
an organism must be able to both to form an internal representation of it's environment
and to send messages to its muscles to control movement.
but then what confuses me is what appears to be be another Necessary condition introduced in the subsequent sentence... "Such an organism must therefore have a central nervous system" again another must indicating what appears to be another Necessary condition. Then strangely the argument denys the antecedent aka the sufficient condition when it states " thus an organism incapable of planned locomotion, does not have a central nervous system.
I though confusing the sufficient and necessary condition is exactly like affirming the consequent
A>B
B
therefore A.
Logically valid structure
A>B
A
Therefore B..........
You can now enter a WAJ template in your notes. Here's a quick demo:
Hi, I am looking for people to start a study group with. Online that can commit at least two days out fo the week to study and go over things with each other. Please comment if you are interested.
I scored a 169 on November. I'm thinking it had something to do with RC. I average a low 170. I want to take it up to the mid 170s. How do I do this for January. Please help :)
Anyone here in Calgary or Alberta area? Looking for study buddy or tutor or just someone that would like to bounce ideas off each other. I'm planning on writing in Feb 2026.
I’m considering taking the February LSAT. I’m not aiming for any T-14 schools and am mostly focused on HBCUs. Since I’m interested in Howard, should I take the February exam or wait for the next application cycle?
Hi all,
I got a 167 and am shooting for UCLA. GPA is a 3.74. Is it worth applying now with my score, or should I hold off and try to score higher in January even though it will be later in the cycle?
During PTs, I usually feel fine, but when I actually sat for the LSAT, my brain froze for a good 2-3 minutes, and I couldn't even figure out the first question.
Hello internet people,
I just started using 7sage. I am super picky. I did a little research on reddit about what sources are good to use. I tried to read Loophole last night and I just couldn't get into it. Started using 7sage today and I really like it. Again, that is saying something because of how picky and skeptical I am. I liked the explanation of the Spanish question (the first question they give you). I got it wrong but after the explanation I was like, oh, this question isn't even hard now that I know how to think.
So, wanting to throw this out there and see what responses I get. Who is paying for 7sage? Is it worth it? So far I am doing everything for free but I'm going to keep using this and see how it goes for a bit.
Any advice for weakening and strengthening questions? I am just plain stuck!!