1 step forward, 2 steps back it seems

Hey y'all. I'd love to see "Blind Review" questions show up here separately. Most of the gaps I'm spending looking over blind review questions and really digging in, but this graph makes it look like I'm doing nothing. Happy to do a user interview if more info is desired!

Hey, I am taking the January LSAT in January and looking for a reliable, committed person who wants to study in person in the Dallas, DFW areas.

https://7sage.com/lessons/logical-reasoning/necessary-assumption-questions/na-lesson-1-pt64-s3-q12

Would someone correct my conditional logic steps that may lead to the condition that forms the answer:

Premise 1: "some gardening books published by Garden Path recommend tilling the soil and adding compost before starting a new garden on a site"

(domain) gardening books:

published by GPP <-s-> tilling AND compost (1)

Premise 2: "they (those same books) do not explain the difference between hot and cold composting."

published by GPP <-s-> / diff H&C composting (2)

Premise 3: "any gardening book that recommends adding compost is flawed if it does not explain at least the basics of composting"

(domain) gardening books :

/ basics composting -> flawed (3)

Conclusion: "some books published by Garden Path are flawed."

published by GPP <-s-> flawed (4)

(4) is the same as :

flawed <-s-> published by GPP (5)

combining (5) and (2)

flawed <-s-> published by GPP <-s-> / diff H&C composting (6)

based off of (6)

flawed <-s-> / diff H&C composting (7)

Combine (7) and (3)

/ basics composting ->/ diff H&C composting

contrapositive:

diff H&C composting -> basics composting

Based on the above D should be the answer perhaps?

Though certainly there is a flaw in there somewhere particularly with the <s> relationships inference etc.

im almost a week behind on my study plan schedule because I did less last week. Is there any way to sync the study plan to today's date so that im not chasing old lessons?

Now you can mention another user in a group chat with `@`.

We've got more features for chat in the works…

Aloha! Looking for LSAT study buddies in Hawaii and to connect on this journey from LSAT to law school.

A new version of the admissions predictor and other law school info tables is live!

You can still access the older version of schools by clicking "Schools V1" in the "Schools" menu. Let us know what you think!

Anybody in Portland, OR want to start a study group with me?

Hello everyone.

Long story short. Life happened and it took me 6 years to graduate. I had multiple semesters I had to withdraw from which resulted in 36 hours of W's.

The LSAC has calculated these W's as F's and my 3.5 gpa is now a 2.62.

On this page https://www.lsac.org/aboutlsac/policies/transcript-summarization#excluded under the heading Grades Excluded from Conversion, the very first point on the list is "Withdraw, Withdraw/Pass—only if the issuing school considers the grade nonpunitive"

So my question is, if my final transcript shows a 3.5 wouldn't these withdrawals be non-punitive? I am understanding the word punitive as my school would use these W's in my GPA calculation as zero.

I have also looked at the site https://www.lsac.org/transcriptkeys/igugs-search.aspx

My school has this listed:

Excluded From Both LSAC and School☼ Calculation

☼Passing grades from systems with fewer than three passing grades (e.g., High Pass/Pass/Fail) are not necessarily excluded from the school's GPA calculation.

Unconverted: CR,P

Omitted: AU,GNR,I,IP,NG,NGR,NR,W,WN

Nonpunitive: (This section is BLANK)

So the Nonpunitive section is blank but W's are listed under Omitted. Maybe I am answering my own question here but do I have a shot at challenging the LSAC's GPA calculation?

Thank you in advance and good luck to everyone here.

PS. I'm kind of starting here to feel the situation out and will contact my registrar soon.

Hi everyone! I am looking to get a study group going for anyone in the Midwest. Looking at an April 2026 LSAT test date. I am going through the LSAT Trainer, the Loophole, PowerScore Reading Comprehension, and obviously 7Sage.

If you don't want a study group, but alternatively just want someone to just connect with and share some encouragement, I am down for that too!

Good Morning,

I've been studying for the November LSAT and would love to know if there are any others in the same boat. If it's of any interest, I'd love to form a study group.

Hi, can this be an option for those who have no experimental on their exam due to accommodations?

I'm taking the lsat in two days and I'm currently freaking out because I remember Kevin said something about few and a few not being the same but I can't remember exactly what he said. I know I'm probably just overanalyzing stuff before the test but if anyone remembers, please help :))))

You can now drop the experimental section from your PrepTests!

I'm taking the LSAT at home for the first time (had a terrible in-person experience so trying this), but I was wondering if anyone with a gaming PC setup has been dinged for having multiple monitors, mic arms, etc.

I've made a second setup with just a laptop, XL gaming pad, and additional monitor as my "testing zone" but was wondering if secondary monitors/graphic mousepads are dinged and not allowed. Should I keep it to just the laptop and mouse?

Would love to hear about other ppl's experiences testing at home and how I can optimize my setup for seamless testing without having to rework my desk the day of.

Hi everyone! I'm looking to create or join a study group in the South Florida area to study virtually and in person!

Hello, I have been a long time user of 7sage and the new website has been good to me but I have noticed a few issues as of recently.

1. When I am practicing in a drill, the highlighter used to be applicable across any question I switched between. But in the sets I have done today, I find myself having to click on the highlighter again whenever I move to another question.

2. When I come to the end of my drill after submitting, the review section is not keeping track of how much time I spent on any question other than the 1st one. When I click on these questions to review them, it tells me that I have to click to mark the questions as seen. This worries me a bit because I don't want to be practicing with the same questions I have done or seen before.

   

3. In blind review it used to only mark questions that the website though you should review, but for some reason every question is marked for blind review whenever I complete a drill now.

   

   Please let me know if there are any fixes to this, thank you!

Time-tracking on drills/sections for me is not consistent/available anymore. If a drill takes 7 minutes to complete and there's five questions, my tracker states that I spent 7 minutes on the first question and 0 minutes on the following four. Is time-tracking not working for anybody else? How can I fix this?

Hi everyone!

I just started my LSAT journey and im planning to take the test in June 2027.

I'm in the GTA area of Ontario and would love to have a virtual study sesh or zoom calls during the weekday. Let me know if anyone else is interested, we could make a group :) 

I recently completed the core curriculum and am starting a study process of a PT once a week and drilling based on the results of the previous test. However, I am two PT's in and what is killing me the most is just blanking on the stimulus and re-reading it over and over only to have time run out with 8-10 questions left to go.

Is there a specific strategy to focus on improving time, or is it just repetition? Should i grind through PT's anyway, or is it better to just do untimed drills?

I'm feeling beyond defeated with Reading Comp. I know we are not reading for detail, but I still feel like im missing connections that help answer the questions. I feel decent at understanding author's opinion, structure, and keeping low res summaries in mind. Any tips?

If I do a question or a section and get 100% then I do not have the option for the clean version and it does not show me what I put for the BR. For example this is Q14 which I got correct as an individual question and when I click Review it does not give me the options of clean, actual take and blind review.

If I do a question or section and I get at least one question wrong, then I do have the option for clean version and I can see the BR as well.

When I did the entire passage together and got some wrong then I see the option for: clean, actual take, and blind review.

As a control, I did a drill for RC and got 100% and just like my first example, I do not see clean version, actual take or blind review.

For every question, it only shows my actual take.

Greetings 7Sagers!

On Tuesday, October 21 at 8pm ET, join 7Sage admissions consultants Taj McCoy and Dr. Sam Riley for another panel discussion with law school admissions deans from across the country. For this conversation, hear from representatives of Boston College, Catholic University, Howard University, Loyola University Chicago, Loyola Los Angeles, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, as they weigh in on the state of admissions and answer questions specific to evaluating personal statements from an admissions perspective. The audience will be able to submit additional questions on this topic throughout the session via the Q&A widget.

*Note: The session will be recorded and will be posted to our podcast after it's edited for sound quality.

Register now: https://7sage.zoom.us/meeting/register/EkG3kKCcTdiU5gZPEP5BiQ

Can someone PLEASE give me an easier way to learn reasoning?? Link Assumption, Casual Reasoning, and Conditional Reasoning seem to be the only consistent thing that im getting wrong. Or is there a class that specifically targets reasoning??