hey guys , i need advice/help. I am studying by myself no tutor, i did my first ever practice test end of August and got a 138 then the next test i did was in october which was 135 and then a week ago 133 and then on that last one i blind reviewed a 150. Today i took a practice test untimed and got a 139 and am going to wait a day to blind review. Is this a normal process for some? I also didnt get 7sage till a week ago and it has way more helpful tools then the book i was using. I notice when i take the test i get stuck with having 2-3 answer choices and on my blind review i would choose the other answer choice i was stuck between. How do i break the cycle of getting the right answer the first time? thanks

Any advice for weakening and strengthening questions? I am just plain stuck!!

Hello internet people,

I just started using 7sage. I am super picky. I did a little research on reddit about what sources are good to use. I tried to read Loophole last night and I just couldn't get into it. Started using 7sage today and I really like it. Again, that is saying something because of how picky and skeptical I am. I liked the explanation of the Spanish question (the first question they give you). I got it wrong but after the explanation I was like, oh, this question isn't even hard now that I know how to think.

So, wanting to throw this out there and see what responses I get. Who is paying for 7sage? Is it worth it? So far I am doing everything for free but I'm going to keep using this and see how it goes for a bit.

Recent PTs: 65–71 range, BR ~175. My misses cluster in LR (causal + sampling flaws, occasional parallel flaw) and RC main point/inference when passages are dense. LG is -0/-1. If you had 14 days, how would you schedule:

• Targeted drilling (question banks vs. PT sections)

• Blind Review steps that actually move the needle (not just re-reading)

• Error log categories you’ve found most predictive

• Full PT frequency (how many in two weeks without burning out accuracy) Looking for concrete schedules (day-by-day or blocks) that worked for you.

If anyone has a concrete two-week plan that actually worked for them, I’d appreciate it. Also found this general legal-study resource helpful while thinking about test strategy.

Hello, is anyone here applying for 2027 cycle but studying now? I graduated unviersity in APpril 2025 and taking a year off but it seems that beginning law school in fall of 2027 is more than a year off because I would be applying fall of 2026? anyone have any advice? I'm 24 and fear that its too late

Hey, I'm pretty new to the LSAT I've been studying for a month using prep books. It's my first time using 7sage. Anyone wanna form a study group? I'm planning on taking the test in June 2026

Am i wrong in saying that logical reasoning, at large, is just reading comprehension in a slightly different format? Instead of synthesizing a text you are understanding/comprehending individual arguments.

I just scored a 178 on PT128.

Hello! Just was wondering if the new released disclosed PT (I think it's the April 2025/Feb 2014 exam) will be uploaded to 7Sage sometime soon? I would like to take this before the January exam, but I would prefer to take it on the computer! Thank you!

Listen and subscribe:

Apple Podcasts | Spotify

Bailey and Henry dive into what it means to “study like a tutor” and why adopting that perspective can make your prep more focused and consistent. They explain how tutors analyze mistakes, evaluate reasoning, and break down patterns, and they show you how to bring those same habits into your own LSAT work.

So I like and dislike the new format. I like how it is a way of practicing like on test day but I don't like how when you cross out an answer it doesn't fade away like on LawHub or before the new update. Can this be brought back.

And can the old format still be used for reviewing. It offered more space to read and review.

seems like a bunch of stuff that doesnt apply to 80 percent of the problems. when does it start getting useful. i feel like im wasting alot of hours on it

Hi everyone! I'm currently on week 3 of my core curriculum study plan and have had a hard time keeping up with the pace of the study plan even though I have it set at the minimum amount of hours a day. In my study plan it says to do PTS regularly once I've finished the core curriculum but wanted to know if anyone else recommends or found it helpful to do PTs sprinkled throughout while doing the core curriculum as well. Or should I just focus on and power through core curriculum and save the PT practice until the end?

To those who have mastered conditional lawgic,

I am wondering what study methods you used to master this. Drilling questions is one thing, but what other methods did you use? Is there a quizlet out there that has all the indicators, translation rules, etc. that I can use? please let me know!

I just scored a 163 on PT139.

Just for some background, I decided to study for the LSAT about a month ago and I have just one chance to take it in January if I want to begin in the fall. I work full time and study when I can, but my job can be very demanding at times. I've taken a practice test every weekend for the past 4 weeks and have scored 164 3 times in a row, and a 163 just yesterday. My blind review is consistently high and I found it's because most of the questions I get wrong are the ones where I'm left between two options.

How can I improve to at least 170 before January 5th? The recorded lessons are great and all, but I've been having some difficulty learning the "lawgic" so I've just been doing all the questions in my head. Is there a better way to study? I feel like the tutoring sessions helped just a bit, but I'm not seeing any improvement.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated!

I am trying to figure out if this is a personal problem or if others agree with me. In the recorded lessons, when the stimulus is being read it is drawn out and everything is shortened. but when I try it on my own, while I'm reading it completely disrupts my reading process. I catch myself forgetting where I am at and instead focusing on abbreviations instead of what I am actually reading. so is this just a me problem? and does anyone have suggestions on how to fix this problem?

Hi! I am interested in creating or joining a LSAT study group around 7pm CT a couple days a week. I have scored 150 on all of my practice tests, and it would be helpful to have people to work through practice questions with! I plan to take the LSAT in April 2026.

I have my heart set on taking the January LSAT and applying for the 2026 cycle. I am finally PT-ing where I want to be and I can see the light at the end of the tunnel.

My mom is insisting that I register for both Jan AND Feb. I have tried to explain to her that Jan is already super late in the application cycle and that Feb is not something I am considering. She believes that I should absolutely register for Feb as well.

My thought process is that Feb would be a complete waste because if January doesn’t go well I would most likely have to wait for the next cycle to apply and therefore would certainly give myself more than one month to retake the exam. I am concerned that schools will see and judge how many times I have registered/taken (I have already canceled August and I took October).

Does anyone have any thoughts on this? Assuming the cost isn’t a factor, should I register for both?

Not sure if this change happened to everyone, but the new format where the test window doesn't take up the entirety of the screen kinda sucks. Before it used to offer a lot more space, which was helpful for scanning the prompts and answers quicker. Anyone know how to change this back or is this a permanent update?

Hi all,

I am really frustrated with my results recently. I started off at 122 (I know it's a bad score) but I've been studying for the past few months and I'm only reached at 135. I'm trying to write the LSAT in February.

Do you think it's possible to get 160 in 2 months? I try to study at least 3 hours a day consistently and I do see improvement.

Does anyone else have other tips? Maybe different resources? I really want to get my score to 160 because most Canadian schools need 160.

I just scored a 162 on PT154.

I just scored a 165 on PT127.

Any feedback would be helpful. As background I took my diagnostic at 158 (in Aug) this is my second full pt. Got some stupid ones wrong on second section by reading the question / 1-2 answer choices wrong.

Hey guys!Itook the test January last year and I have basically forgotten everything and I would like to take the test again in 2026. Wold like to have an accountabiity group where we can keep each other in check and study and drill together! Let me know if anyone is interested!

I was planning to apply the 2026 cycle, though I received a disappointing score on my October LSAT (low 160s), which was ~5-6 points below my PT scores. I took the November test and will receive the results on Wednesday. I have a compelling story, significant work experience at a well known non-profit related to my field of interest, and stellar LORs. For the T14 schools that I'm targeting, my grades are somewhat low (3.7), though it's from an HYPS undergrad and my transcript has a clear upward trajectory and a 4.0 senior year. Additionally, I'm URM, LGBTQ, and disabled. I'm also applying to PhD programs in humanities, ultimately hoping to do a JD/PhD. However, I'm thinking it may make sense to apply for the PhD this cycle, begin the PhD fall 2026 and then apply to law school in one of the following two cycles with (hopefully) a higher LSAT and doctoral coursework under the belt. I'm planning to make a final decision about the cycle after getting the Nov. results this week and tentatively planning on moving ahead with applying if I receive a 165-167+. Part of me is hesitant to try if I receive below 170, especially given that the median scores at these schools are on the rise and this is shaping up to be the most competitive cycle ever.

Regarding the joint degree, I'm less concerned about doing them at the same university and more so attending the strongest and best fit programs for each degree.

Thoughts on how to make this decision? Could it be helpful to speak with an admissions consultant/expert?

Hi guys, I am just starting out I finished the argument section under foundation but I need to know when I should start to do actual practice tests... Because I am only learning but not experiencing it. Any tips would be great.