I just scored a 162 on PT154.

I just scored a 165 on PT127.

Any feedback would be helpful. As background I took my diagnostic at 158 (in Aug) this is my second full pt. Got some stupid ones wrong on second section by reading the question / 1-2 answer choices wrong.

Hey guys!Itook the test January last year and I have basically forgotten everything and I would like to take the test again in 2026. Wold like to have an accountabiity group where we can keep each other in check and study and drill together! Let me know if anyone is interested!

I was planning to apply the 2026 cycle, though I received a disappointing score on my October LSAT (low 160s), which was ~5-6 points below my PT scores. I took the November test and will receive the results on Wednesday. I have a compelling story, significant work experience at a well known non-profit related to my field of interest, and stellar LORs. For the T14 schools that I'm targeting, my grades are somewhat low (3.7), though it's from an HYPS undergrad and my transcript has a clear upward trajectory and a 4.0 senior year. Additionally, I'm URM, LGBTQ, and disabled. I'm also applying to PhD programs in humanities, ultimately hoping to do a JD/PhD. However, I'm thinking it may make sense to apply for the PhD this cycle, begin the PhD fall 2026 and then apply to law school in one of the following two cycles with (hopefully) a higher LSAT and doctoral coursework under the belt. I'm planning to make a final decision about the cycle after getting the Nov. results this week and tentatively planning on moving ahead with applying if I receive a 165-167+. Part of me is hesitant to try if I receive below 170, especially given that the median scores at these schools are on the rise and this is shaping up to be the most competitive cycle ever.

Regarding the joint degree, I'm less concerned about doing them at the same university and more so attending the strongest and best fit programs for each degree.

Thoughts on how to make this decision? Could it be helpful to speak with an admissions consultant/expert?

Hi guys, I am just starting out I finished the argument section under foundation but I need to know when I should start to do actual practice tests... Because I am only learning but not experiencing it. Any tips would be great.

Firstly, I am proud of my blind review score; I have never recieved a BR score as low as this before (as a 148 scorer). I actually understand the content and my drills now!...but timing always holds me back! I know I can do this and I have potential, but I'm always rushing in LR, and I am panic answering questions by the end of RC. I literally don't know how to pace myself effectively, I've tried dividing time, flagging questions, pacing myself etc. The main issue with LR especially is that i KNOW how to figure out the answer, I just quite literally don't have the time to map out the whole question to answer a CondR question. I don't know what to do! Please give tips. I want to reach around the 160s.

I’m registered for the April LSAT. Anyone else looking to form a group in the Detroit Metro area? We can do drills, study and commiserate on our road to law school!

I just scored a 171 on PT127.

I just scored a 162 on PT147. I want to improve my score to be at least 168-170.

I've started a new video series where I dive into student PrepTest results and offer some high-level strategic advice. I did the first one with Kevin and had a lot of fun with it.

I'd love to do more of these, so please share your PT results!

Is there a way to get access to the summaries that are posted at the end of various lessons? I would love to print them out instead of navigating them on Miro website... I really do not like that format.

I just scored a 151 on PT126. Aiming for a 170 by January - any advice? :)

I just scored a 159 on PT145. I have taken the LSAT five times now (latest test in November), and I just got approved for a 6th test in June. 152 on the first official attempt without studying, 156 three times in a row after that with no logic games. So, worse case scenario I think I'll hop back on the study train if November's results don't land me in the low/mid 160's. (I took April's released test that was on the LSAC site and scored a 162). Any suggestions on where to go from here would be appreciated. I am around a 158/159/low 160's range. I really believe I am capable of going into the mid 160's. Any advice on where to go from here? Thanks!

Q

I'm looking for an outline for my foundations notes. Does 7sage offer pdfs to print for a note outline? Has anyone made an outline and would be willing to share it with me? My notes feel unorganized and I don't have the time to fully rewrite them but would love a more organzied notebook to follow and keep on hand!

My drill screen has just shrunk 50% smaller and it's difficult to read. Can we fix this back to full screen? Thanks

Hi I'm looking for study buddies. Im planning on taking the exam in June 2026. Would love to study with people and learn off of each other :)

I have been doing 2 sections a day (1 LR 1 RC) in preparation for the Jan LSAT. Just this morning when I went to do my sections the whole layout had changed. The questions and stimulus is in a small box in the middle of my screen leaving much open space. Also all the text is super condensed. It threw me off ngl. Is this how the LSAT will frfr look on test day. I plan to take it in a testing center.

I just scored a 162 on PT146.

I have the experimental section excluded. I can’t seem to break out of the low 160s. I keep scoring 160/161/162. Scored 160 on the official test 3 times... Any advice? I am taking the January LSAT

Feeling like I've got a long road ahead to score 175 in January. Any tips? Feeling like parallel reasoning is dragging eme down most. Formal logic is occasionally a trip up, but not often.

I just scored a 175 on PT126.

Philosopher: You’re an idiot. Even if we care about nature, banning fossil fuels would lead to massive deforestation as manufacturers turn to biofuels as a substitute. So we shouldn’t listen to your smooth-brained policy proposal.

Environmentalist: Ad hominem! Ad hominem! And you call yourself a philosopher.

Philosopher: No. I didn’t commit the ad hominem fallacy.

Environmentalist: But you insulted me and said I was wrong.

Philosopher: No, no, my illogical friend. There’s nuance to this. We commit the ad hominem fallacy when we attack the source of a claim as support for why that claim is wrong.

For example -

You smell like a cesspit. So, we shouldn’t listen to you when you tell us to use eco-friendly soap.

Here, I’m citing to your stench as a reason to reject your recommendation. But the idea that we should use eco-friendly soap should be evaluated on its own merit. What are the pros and cons of eco-friendly soap? That’s what we should consider, not your distasteful body odor. That’s why this argument commits an ad hominem fallacy.

However, consider my original statements.

You’re an idiot. Even if we care about nature, banning fossil fuels would lead to massive deforestation as manufacturers turn to biofuels as a substitute. So we shouldn’t listen to your smooth-brained policy proposal.

Notice that even though I am calling you an idiot, and even though I label your proposal as smooth-brained, I’m not saying that we shouldn’t listen to you because you’re a smooth-brained idiot. I rely instead on the effects of banning fossil fuels to support my conclusion. My comments on your lack of intelligence are simply fun add-ons that don’t play a logical role in my argument. So I’m not committing the ad hominem fallacy.

Environmentalist: Interesting. I think I get it.

Philosopher: Let me give you another example.

Environmentalist: Thanks, but I’m pretty sure I und–

Philosopher: You’re a stinky, mouth-breathing dunce. Ad hominem?

Environmentalist: …Yes?

Philosopher: Ha! Trick question – it wasn’t even an argument. So calling the claim logically flawed wouldn’t even make sense.

Environmentalist: I see. Well, I have to get–

Philosopher: If I had said, for example, that we shouldn’t listen to you because you’re a stinky, mouth-breathing loser and nobody likes you, then that would have been an ad hominem fallacy.

Environmentalist: Thanks, I got it.

Philosopher: You’re welcome, you foul-smelling fool. Not ad hominem!

Hello,

I am reaching out because my Lawhub account is about to expire. I spoke with LSAC and they said that any prompt I am receiving about LawHub on a third-party vendor site should be addressed with the third-party vendor.

I am receiving a LAWHUB ERROR! message next to my profile icon on 7sage and I want to be sure that when this expires, this will not impact my current profile with 7sage. LSAC has informed me that upon expiration I will have to generate a new LawHub account and I cannot renew before the expiration.

Am I about to lose all of my progress with 7sage that I have tracked? What are next steps? As this expires next week for me.

I've been averaging a ten-plus point difference on the actual test versus my blind review, and I don't know what I'm doing wrong.

I know correlation does not imply causation, but out of curiosity, does cause imply correlation? and is this something that would ever be encountered on the lsat?

Hello everyone!

I wanted to share my experience with the admissions and writing consulting services at 7Sage. Working with both Daniel Ryu (writer) and Jennifer Kott (Admissions Officer) was a great experience. They were not only knowledgeable and supportive throughout the process, but were also very responsive to all my questions and emails.

While working on the written portions of my application, Daniel was always willing to meet with me through video meetings about once a week and provided great feedback on my work, which allowed me to improve it. Jennifer was equally helpful, answering my questions about the admissions process both during our video session and through email. She helped shed light on some concerns and questions I had about law school and the admissions process, and I greatly appreciated her dedication to help, answer my questions, and reply to emails in a timely manner.

If I had to go through the admissions process all over again, I would absolutely choose 7Sage, their writers, and admissions experts to help me with the application process. Their support was excellent, and I couldn’t recommend them more.