I don't know why this trips me up SO BADLY, but I ended up switching this one to the correct answer in my BR.
BUT, I watched the video and I reasoned it differently.
We're taught that, if we're given a premise, we have to take it to be true, ...
Clearly I'm having a hard time mapping out logic... Can someone please explain the correct answer? Also any tips on how to improve mapping out logic would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks!
... questions are from PT 36 SECTION1 #18 and PT 63 SECTION1 #10. I'm ... having trouble understanding why for PT ... conclusion is correct but for PT 63 an answer choice (D ...
... question for high scorers; when you see an argument like PT 22 - Section ... 4 - Question 21 that have sufficiency ... because when I read the question I thought it probably is ...
The first ... talking about "Otterville" but the question and answers used "Outerville". ... game changing. In my PT 22, Section 4, Question 14, answer choice ... a difference between their PT's language and what ...
2nd question is, I'm having trouble ... questions in the syllabus (LSAT Preptest 34, Section 2, Question 12). I asked ... this in the question just ... these. In it, this question introduces a data set, in ...
Proposition questions: should I approach these like an inference question or a principle question? I've read different things. Example of this question type is PT 82 section 2 question 14.
I don't understand how B is wrong; I understand how D is the correct answer and I went back and forth, but ultimately thought that the argument had no basis if they couldn't use recycled materials in the first place?? I get why D is the best choice, but I ...
In PT 13, Section 4, Question 7, when Murray says "You ... very relevant to answering the question, though not absolutely necessary. PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of question"**
I don't understand how E is the right answer over D. I eliminated the answer choice E because she claimed to be an insurance adjuster and didn't provide proof. How is claiming to be anything providing enough proof of being a government official? If the ...
I understand why the correct answer choice is correct because if robots were the only things going out to space, then why do we need to know anything about human limits but I don't understand why B is incorrect. Isn't the stimulus making the assumption ...
@Sahng-Ah, you can certainly ask these questions here. Have you taken a look at the video explanations? http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-june-2007-section-2-question-01/
This is straightforward ... finding it really difficult. The question consists of two or statements ... />
How is this diagrammed? The question asks what must be assumed ...