I have fool proofed LG 1-35 and I'm still averaging -8 or -10. I think my problem is I didn't do the weird games that showed up 1-20. Should I just do those games i didn't fool proof or should I start over?
Most online resources I’ve read recommend that LG is studied first because it is most learnable and gets your brain wired up for the LSAT best. Is there a disadvantage to starting with LG on 7Sage and is LR first because it’s the largest section(s)?
... I can improve on my LG I will be borderline at ... , that score high on the LG sections, can provide any tips ... how they study or approach LG sections. Thank you in advance ...
... LSAT and honestly miss practicing LG. I figured since I continue ... for anyone struggling with foundational LG skills. I consistently finish this ...
I ... thread "The Four Pillars of LG Consistency" for a reason. Notice ... complicated and long solution. In LG we can often eliminate an ... most of the time. LG has stayed remarkably consistent for ...
Is there somewhere on 7sage to purchase the logic games bundle to foolproof the games. I thought I had seen it somewhere but now I can't seem to find it.
... currently foolproofing games in the bundle (I've done PTs 1 ... every LR section and every LG section in these PTs.
- Accuracy is getting better in LG (-0 in Blind Review) but ...
... started focusing on improving my LG/RC I was averaging about ... around 2 weeks bringing my LG/RC to a point where ... getting ~2-4 wrong on LG and ~4-5 wrong on ... without seeing my work with LG/RC suffer?
I found ...
I had two sections of LG. THEY ARE RIDICULOUSLY HARD! I had no mental power left after those two sections!!! How do you guys feel about those two sections??