HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 1 | 27.1K | 40.9K |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 4 | 14.4K | 19.8K |
| question | 29.2K | 48.6K |
| 11 | 2.1K | 2.6K |
-
PTB.S4.Q25 - Some residents of Midville claim...Hi everyone! I just took five practice questions and for PT B, section 4, question 25. If anyone has this question open or has worked on it recently,…
... and for PT B, section 4, question 25. If anyone has this question open or ... -
PT9.S4.Q20 - Of every 100 burglar alarms police answer...Can someone explain why the correct answer choice is C for PT 9, Section 4, Question 20?
Can someone explain why the correct answer choice is C for PT 9, Section 4, Question 20? -
Strengthening Causal ReasoningWhen it comes to strengthening causal reasoning, I understand that offering other instances where a cause leads to an effect (cause -> effect) will a…
... . One particular question that shows this logic is PT 66 Section 4 Question 12.
Necessary and sufficientI understand that this is probably a dumb question but I keep having difficulties with flaw questions that have answers that "confuse necessary and s…
... when I was working on PT 73 section 4, question 25:
I ...Search function?Is there a specific search box for the discussion board (not control + F)? Am I just blind?
... annoyed if you ask a question that has already been asked ... before I posted!
PT 66 Section 4 Question 20.
Conditionals ...Causation Question StrategyWould somebody mind looking at the strategy below and letting me know if it makes sense/I've included everything? Thanks! On weakening questi…
This is an excellent list that I will be bookmarking. Thank you. PT 29 Section 4 Question 24 is illustrative. A very complex weakening question containing causation.What Exactly is an Intensive?I see them mentioned on here a lot, but, aside from @"Cant Get Right"'s webinars, I rarely see them discussed or practiced much. Could someone explai…
... took an intensive over about 4-5 days for necessary assumption ... a necessary assumption. Consider: PT 39-Section 4 Question 19. While I started scrambling ... example of this is 37-4-19. These two (among others ...Does anyone else think that the recent PT LR Qs punish prephrases?Ok, I might be exaggerating when I say "punish prephrases," but I noticed that the prephrases, especially for the flaw/ assumption type questions, do…
... wonderful advice. I have one question: how is strengthening/ weakening the ... example take a look at PT 58 Section 4 question 23.
The ... a five star difficulty strengthening question. I am sure a ... of the difficulty of this question is answer choice "A" ..."if all and only those" -- biconditional?Hello, I was working on PT35.S4.Q11, and came across the expression "if all and only those", and it seemed to me as a biconditional indicator, bu…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-35-section-4-question-11/
Also, could you ...PT19.S4.Q11 - five thousand of the 50,000 books publishedhttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-4-question-11/ (B) None of the films released in country Z in 1992 were based on books other t…
:warning: You cannot post an actual LSAT question. Please edit the original post. :warning:
7Sage forum rule: https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/15/forum-rules
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-4-question-11/PT19.S4.Q11 - five thousand of the 50,000 books publishedhttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-4-question-11/ (B) None of the films released in country Z in 1992 were based on books other t…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-4-question-11/
P: 500 books ...PT14.S4.Q9 - anyone who supports the new tax planI'm really having trouble with this question. Am I supposed to approach it as a sufficient assumption question though it's a flaw question? Thanks in…
I've been really looking into sufficient/necessary flaws lately. A particularly difficult way in which the test writers described the flaw appears on PT A section 4 question 20.PT1.S4.Q21 - A lawless societyI have no idea why the answer must include "some" instead of "many". Am I going crazy?
Sorry - this is my first time posting a discussion comment. I'm specifically talking about PrepTest 1 - Section 4 - Question 21 for Logical Reasoning.I do not understand this answercan someone help? I don't see a distinction between both levels of oxygen
hello!
preptest 1 section 3 question 11PTA.S4.Q25 - People's intentions cannot be...Can someone provide an explanation for this question? #help
Hi!
This is my first time using this service, so thank you for clarifying. It is PT A, Section 4, Question 25.PT 69 BR call - UPDATE Section 4 LR Meeting Wednesday, March 24th, at 6pm EST. [Link Posted]All scoring levels welcome. Flex test version. Requirements: - Have taken the PT or at least the section you want to BR (section 4, the 2nd LR se…
... the PT or at least the section you want to BR (section 4, ... 't be doing every question on the test, just ... New York)
> +1 301 715 8592 US (Washington ... DC)
> +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago ... (Tacoma)
> +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston ...PT 1-35 as Drills or PTI'm familiar with question types and general approaches to different questions from previous study. I wonder if it makes more sense to do PT 1-35 as …
I'm familiar with question types and general approaches to ... more sense to do PT 1-35 as timed 4-section tests, instead of ... wasted the full length tests 1-35. Please let me know ...[Study Guide]: Principle Question SubtypesFor those of you on the PT 55 BR call -- sorry it took me so long to get this up, but below are my notes on Principle questions and subtypes. Please …
... of you on the PT 55 BR call -- sorry ... the LSAT.
1. Sufficient Assumption
-Supply additional ... caution.
-PT52, Section 3, Question 11 provides an apt example of ... impermissible.
4. Apply the Principle
-Given ...PT 1.S1.Q26 (P4) - outside the medical professionhttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-1-section-1-passage-4-questions/ I'm reviewing RC heavy, and I got stuck on this question, specifically an…
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-1-section-1-passage-4-questions/
I'm ... I got stuck on this question, specifically answer choice A (I ...PT 46 S4 Game 3 Question# 12<i>Hey 7Sagers, had someone email me with a question and I thought you guys could help out! Here it is:</i> I have a question or comment regar…
... regarding LSAT 46, game 3, section 4, question 12. The game ask for ... =5; L = 1, 2, 4; N =1,2, 4, and O = 1,2,4,5
For order choices question ... a factor to answer this question. In addition, the rules and ...How useful is the LR from PT 1-16?Hey everyone, So I am mainly drilling sections PT 1-35 for the next couple months before PT stage. I drilled a LR section from PT 1 and found it …
... I am mainly drilling sections PT 1-35 for the next couple ... months before PT stage. I drilled a LR section from PT 1 and found ... it to be really weird. The question ... focusing on 1-16?
Sorry if this question has been ...[Spoiler Alert] LR Issues PT 69 - Section 4There were several questions in this section that seemed to provide answers that I could not seem to justify even after BRing, not sure if this type …
... were several questions in this section that seemed to provide answers ... .
When I did this question it seemed as if it ... be published this year -
1. important;
2. well written ... correct logical representation for this question?[Ended] PT 79 Blind Review with J.Y. | Multiple SessionsHey 7Sagers, I want to try something different for PT 79 (September 2016 LSAT). Instead of making videos, I will lead BR sessions. (Videos will be …
... to try something different for PT 79 (September 2016 LSAT ... and are taking PT 79 as their final PT.
< ... focus on only one section of PT 79. All sessions ... 11/22 Tuesday - Section 4 - LR
11/23 Wednesday - Section 1 - LR
11/25 Friday - Section ...PT 82 BR Sessions with J.Y. [Spoiler Warning]Hey 7Sagers, I'm leading BR calls for PT 82 (September 2017 LSAT). I'm holding 6 sessions total. 2 for each of LR 1, LR 2, and RC. Each session w…
... will focus on only one section of PT 82.
Take PT 82 and have the ... sessions]
Obtaining PT 82
If you have ... 11/10 Friday - Section 1 - LR
11/11 Saturday - Section 4 - LR
11/13 Monday - Section ...In case anyone wanted to know which LG from PT 1-35 are taught in CC...PT 1: Game 3 PT 2: Game 4 PT 3: Game 2 PT 4: Game 2 PT 5: PT 6: PT 7: PT 8: PT 9: Game 2 PT 10: PT 11: PT 12: Game 3 PT 13: PT 14: PT …
PT 1: Game 3
PT 2: Game 4
PT 3: Game 2
PT 4: Game ... /> PT 10:
PT 11:
PT 12: Game 3
PT 13:
PT 14 ... :
PT 15 ...Road to 170+: Blind Review Bootcamp (Free tutoring session PT 65 Section 1 March 7th 3pm Eastern)Hi Folks: Some of you may not know how to properly blind review. What better way to learn than from a seasoned LSAT Sage? Or perhaps you just wan…
... as we blind review PT 65 LR Section 1 next Saturday
PT 65 LR Section 1 LR
What ... to prepare:
Complete PT 65 Section 1 but DO NOT mark it ...Examples of Common Flaws#help Hello! Wanted to know if anyone had PT questions for some common flaws that I can watch? I'm looking for a necessary/sufficiency confusion …
... one sufficiency-neccesity confusion per PT :joy:
Here is ... .Q25 (★★★★) may be a good question to review.Help with Flaw Type ExamplesHey everyone, I am having a hard time with Flaw Questions. I know we are supposed to memorize the common argument flaws but that is where my struggle…
... one sufficiency-neccesity confusion per PT.
PT17.S2.Q11; PT22 ...Help with Flaw Type ExamplesHey everyone, I am having a hard time with Flaw Questions. I know we are supposed to memorize the common argument flaws but that is where my struggle…
... one sufficiency-neccesity confusion per PT.
> PT17.S2.Q11 ...
