@jenleeva had a good question about the first LR section of PT 39, Q12 ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-39-section-2-question-12/#comment-182531
I've already attempted the question and watched and re-watched ... ; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]"** section-2-question-18/**
... drawn out for LSAT 21 Section2Question 12 December 1996 test. PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of question"**
https ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-21-section-2-question-12/
In the rattlesnake question, I saw "food" and dismissed ... too obvious. Perhaps a good question to ask of the answer ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-30-section-2-question-22/
... interesting post from JY on section2, Question 20, PT 56. I dont think ... is actually a necessary assumption question, which very clearly knocks out ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-56-section-2-question-20/
PT 77's explanations are for ... you sure it's question 20? That question isn't about Selena ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-77-section-2-question-20/