HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 22 | 985 | 1.2K |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 2 | 23.7K | 33.4K |
| question | 29.2K | 48.6K |
| 4 | 14.4K | 19.8K |
-
Beliefs v. FactsI've only come across this type of flaw a few times, but I'd like to understand the structure behind it. The explanation and example offered in the c…
Just came across an excellent example of this flaw on a really, really valuable question: PT 31 Section 2 question 21. -
Help with LR questionsHello everyone, While going through my last few practice tests , I have noticed that I have two consistent problems regarding LR sections. 1)…
... phenomena can be found on PT 49 Section 2 Question 7. I've been ... 'm thinking here of PT 53 Section 1 Question 8. I had to ... -
Help with LR questionsHello everyone, While going through my last few practice tests , I have noticed that I have two consistent problems regarding LR sections. 1)…
... access 1-2 star questions through the question bank and ... today I took PT 56. Section 3 Question 10 on that exam ... was apparently a really difficult question ... days ago I reviewed PT 37 Section 2 Question 19, is the reasoning ... -
PT22.S2.Q25 - a recent survey showed thatHey, guys! Can you help me make sense of my reasoning for selecting this answer choice, if that makes sense?! Lol Ok so I chose D but I get why B …
... /> https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-22-section-2-question-25/ -
Old LSAT QuestionsHi! Is anyone else looking at 10 Actual, Official LSAT Preptests, even though they are less relevant? Let's talk about them here!
OK, working on PT 9 - Section 2 - Question 23:
This one ... stimulus. The second difficulty was 2) realizing that the missing sufficient ... -
Confusing S for N versus N for SPremise: Resign--->Convicted Conclusion: Convicted--->Resign Would this be confusing N for S or S for N? I thought the two were interchangeable but…
The answer choice says confusing S for N though. That is why I am confused. PT 22, Section 2, #25 -
Mistaken Reversal versus Mistaken NegationAren't the two logical equivalents? Mistaken Reversal is "confusing Necessary for Sufficient" while it's the other way around for Mistaken Negation. …
The question I am referring to is from PT22.S2.Q25.
**Admin Note:** https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-22-section-2-question-25/ -
Using LawgicIve become familiar with the system of translation but Im still struggling to understand the practical use of making the translations. Is it just tha…
... from B by exactly 2 spots with A preceding ... we were answering a question or making a game ... 10 seconds on a question: that is a victory ... us.
2. The second practical use in ... illustration of this please see PT 49 Section 2 Question 7.
Question: Cambridge PT 5th Section (PT-A)?I just found a copy of PT74 I bought from CambridgeLSAT awhile ago. It looks like it's got 5 sections, with the 3rd section labeled as (PT-A) on the …
... sections, with the 3rd section labeled as (PT-A) on the Answer ... to indicate whether this section came from another PT.
Are ... there more than 4 LSAT sections ...Descriptive premises with normative conclusions in sufficient assumption questionsIs it always the case that if an argument for a sufficient assumption question has descriptive premises with a normative conclusion (saying one shoul…
... argument for a sufficient assumption question has descriptive premises with a ... />
Looking at PT 22, Section 4, Q13 and PT 62, Section 2, Q17, I can see ...Section 5 - using PT 36-41Hi all! Getting ready to start PT after finishing up most of the CC (75% done) Has anyone ripped out section 1 from PT 36 and used it as the se…
... /> Getting ready to start PT after finishing up most of ... anyone ripped out section 1 from PT 36 and used ... as the section 5 in say.. PT 42? Section 2 from 36 ... in PT 43, so ... around here (seriously staples, $4 per exam?) so I ...Logical Reasoning: StatisticsAfter combing through numerous tests looking for ways to improve my logical reasoning score, I isolated a concept throughout the preptests that I was…
... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-30-section-4-question-22/
PT 34
"A group ... com/lsat_explanations/lsat-31-section-2-question-03/
PT 34 #13: Necessary ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-34-section-2-question-13/
For ...Examples of Common Flaws#help Hello! Wanted to know if anyone had PT questions for some common flaws that I can watch? I'm looking for a necessary/sufficiency confusion …
... one sufficiency-neccesity confusion per PT :joy:
Here is ... .Q25 (★★★★) may be a good question to review.Help with Flaw Type ExamplesHey everyone, I am having a hard time with Flaw Questions. I know we are supposed to memorize the common argument flaws but that is where my struggle…
... one sufficiency-neccesity confusion per PT.
PT17.S2.Q11; PT22 ...Help with Flaw Type ExamplesHey everyone, I am having a hard time with Flaw Questions. I know we are supposed to memorize the common argument flaws but that is where my struggle…
... one sufficiency-neccesity confusion per PT.
> PT17.S2.Q11 ...The secret to do tough Weaken/strengthen questionToday I have a big progress in weaken/strengthen question. I find in most weaken/strengthen question, there exists a presumption and the only thing…
... com/lsat_explanations/lsat-37-section-2-question-20/
... PT 52 S3 Q19
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-section ... PT 52 S1 Q21.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-section ... -1-question-21/
...Weaken question - trap answer choice or no?Hi fellow 7sagers, As a review tonight I decided to write down steps I take for weakening questions. I’d appreciate any response to this question I…
... appreciate any response to this question I have... PLEASE! It ... bothering me for the past 2 hours. I realize that ... video explanation I watched, PT 60 Section 1 Question 13 (in short – ... “Serious Medical Condition – Weaken Question” video lesson and in that ...PT June 2007.S2.Q24 - car companies solicit consumer informationI have been analyzing all the June 2007 (public domain) questions one by one, and find that they all neatly fit into very neat symbolic argument patt…
... argument patterns--except for Section II Question 24. I would appreciate ... any comments on this particular question, especially if someone can ... is a free PT! You can see the question and explanation ... com/lsat_explanations/lsat-june-2007-section-2-question-24Flaw questions: Sufficiency necessity confusionI got a question for high scorers; when you see an argument like PT 22 - Section 4 - Question 21 that have sufficiency necessity confusion but you de…
... you see an argument like PT 22 - Section 4 - Question 21 that have sufficiency necessity ... because when I read the question I thought it probably is ...Neither Nor Question (Ref. PT22.G4.R4 & PT31.G2.R4)I'm confused why the arrow splits for PT 22 GAME 4 RULE 4 and the arrow doesn't split for PT 31 GAME 2 RULE 4 even though they both contain the words…
I'm confused why the arrow splits for PT 22 GAME 4 RULE 4 and the arrow doesn't split for PT 31 GAME 2 RULE 4 even though they both contain the words NEITHER NOR.
I thought the arrow can't be split for NEITHER NOR statements.Preptests misspelling or missing words?As I am going through the CC I have noticed in at least two PTs that there have been a misspelled or missing word in a question. The first time I…
... or missing word in a question.
The first ... talking about "Otterville" but the question and answers used "Outerville". ... more game changing. In my PT 22, Section 4, Question 14, answer choice B ... a difference between their PT's language and what ...PT June 2007.S2.Q22 - editorialist: news mediaSharing this because while eliminating AC E, I was forced to question the difference between causation and sufficiency as well as the danger of using…
... E, I was forced to question the difference between causation and ... local politics thoroughly.
Premise 2: Local politics is usually conducted ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-june-2007-section-2-question-22/PT77.S2.Q16 - Some people see no harmHi, everyone! I need some help going through questions 16 and 18 of PT 77, Sec 2. <font color=red>Admin edit: Please review the <a href="htt…
... 16 and 18 of PT 77, Sec 2.
Admin ... edit: Please review the forum rules. "4 ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-77-section-2-question-16/
A ...Conditional RuleHey guys so I have a question regarding logic games and conditional rules. Specifically it is from PT #27, Sec 2, Game #4. For question #22 in the ga…
... it is from PT #27, Sec 2, Game #4. For question #22 in the game ... it asks, " If car 4 ... be purple. So regarding that question, just that rule is diminished ... clarification on this because this question tripped me up big ...Quick question on whether or not this assumption is ok for the LSATIf cars drive faster, there will typically be a higher accident/fatality rate. **PT 57 Spoiler below** I'm writing out an explanation for https:/…
... accident/fatality rate.
**PT 57 Spoiler below**
I ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-57-section-2-question-20/ and I got to ...Question Regarding Weaken and Strengthen QuestionsHello. Lately I have been having a lot of trouble with grasping what exactly I am supposed to be doing with Weaken and Strengthen Questions. I unders…
...
To make my question a bit more clear I ... will be using Question 15 from "Weaken Questions ... the forum rules.
4. Do not post LSAT questions ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-25-section-2-question-15/
...Advice on Study Approach until March ExamHi 7Sage Community, Was hoping to get advice on my study plan between now and the March LSAT. I work full-time (830-5) and have been recently…
... ).
On a 4 section test, I just hit my ... on PT 58
Section 1 LR (-6), Section 2 RC (-4), Section 3 LG (-4), Section 4 LR (-4 ... and Flaw).
My question is should I cut down ... will be making the 5th section count each time (to ...PT 87 RC Comparative Passage 4 Explanations - Part B not uploaded - help?For the PT 87 RC comparative passage 4, the video explanation for the passage B is not uploaded. When you click the video explanation, it just brings…
For the PT 87 RC comparative passage 4, the video explanation for the ... passage A. So there are 2 duplicate videos for passage A ...PT83.S2.Q21(P4) - The novelist and social theorist CharlotteThis is the main point question from the Gilman Passage Can some one please explain why (A) is incorrect? I was stuck between A and D, but chose A…
This is the main point question from the Gilman Passage
... for the Main Point question to just leave out ... please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q#(P#) - [brief ... section-2-passage-4-passage/
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-83-section-2-passage-4 ...
