HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 3 | 22.5K | 32.2K |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 2 | 23.7K | 33.4K |
-
PT35.S2.P4 - ronald dworkin argues that judges arehttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-35-section-2-passage-4-passage/ I am a long-time lurker that is gearing up for the October exam. I really…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-35-section-2-passage-4-passage/
section of PT 35, section 2 passage 4 - Dworkin and ... appreciated!!
I went (-2), but found myself struggling with ... -
Pt 67 section 2 problem 11Why is the answer e?? I thought the best was a. I don't understand why sulfur 33 is rarely found. I thought what they had found were HIGHER THAN NORM…
Why is the answer e?? I thought the best was a. I don't understand why sulfur 33 is rarely found. I thought what they had found were HIGHER THAN NORMAL concentration. Meaning today's diamond could still have s33 but less of it.
Halp. -
PT. 22 Section 2 Question 22Clearly I'm having a hard time mapping out logic... Can someone please explain the correct answer? Also any tips on how to improve mapping out logic …
Clearly I'm having a hard time mapping out logic... Can someone please explain the correct answer? Also any tips on how to improve mapping out logic would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks! -
A confusion between conditional logic and causationHi 7sagers, I just had a confusion cause by PT 68 section 2 question 24. JY's explanation is if Hormone causes Stress, then reducing Hormone can redu…
... had a confusion cause by PT 68 section 2 question 24. JY's ... -
PT 70, Section 2, Question 6Hi, On this question I narrowed it down to C and D. But even though I've read a couple explanations on it, I don't see why D is glaringly wrong. I f…
Hi,
On this question I narrowed it down to C and D. But even though I've read a couple explanations on it, I don't see why D is glaringly wrong. I feel like C isn't fair enough because it has words like "chance" and "try to identify" which means ... -
PT 66 Section 2 Question 13: Brooks: I'm unhappy in my....Okay, this question has got me. I'm BRing it, and I honestly cannot rule one answer out with confidence. That never happens. A, C, and D all seem pre…
Okay, this question has got me. I'm BRing it, and I honestly cannot rule one answer out with confidence. That never happens. A, C, and D all seem pretty subjective to me, "mischaracterizing what Brooks says", "unhappiness varying in intensity of ... -
PT48.S2.Q19 (G4) - three folk groupsPT 48 Section 2 (LG) Q.19 Questions asks: Which one of the following groups must perform earlier than 10? Does that mean it includes 10? …
PT 48 Section 2 (LG) Q.19
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-48-section-2-game-4/ -
PT77.S2.Q19 - a recent study examinedHi All, So I'm still struggling to identify exactly when certain arguments could be strengthened or weakened by the total number of samples (or a…
... trend) etc.
PT 77 Section 2 #19: A recent study examined ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-77-section-2-question-19/ -
Descriptive premises with normative conclusions in sufficient assumption questionsIs it always the case that if an argument for a sufficient assumption question has descriptive premises with a normative conclusion (saying one shoul…
... /> Looking at PT 22, Section 4, Q13 and PT 62, Section 2, Q17, I can ... -
What's the LSAT's definition of "linked"?In PT 77, Section 2, Questions 5 and 14 they both use the word "linked" in their arguments. When the LSAT uses the word "linked," does it only mean c…
In PT 77, Section 2, Questions 5 and 14 they both use the word "linked" in their arguments. When the LSAT uses the word "linked," does it only mean correlation? -
PT77.S2.Q18 - historian: those who claim that shakespearePT 77, Section 2, #18 Answer Choices C and D. Does "fails to exclude" mean the same thing more or less as "fails to consider"? I thought "fails to …
PT 77, Section 2, #18 Answer Choices C and ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-77-section-2-question-18/ -
Proposition QuestionsProposition questions: should I approach these like an inference question or a principle question? I've read different things. Example of this questi…
Proposition questions: should I approach these like an inference question or a principle question? I've read different things. Example of this question type is PT 82 section 2 question 14.
Thanks in advance! -
PT 59 Section 2 (LR1)Could somebody explain to me why the correct answers are correct for questions 7, 18, and 25? Why is 7 (e) instead of (b), why is 18 (d) instead of …
Could somebody explain to me why the correct answers are correct for questions 7, 18, and 25?
Why is 7 (e) instead of (b), why is 18 (d) instead of (c), and why is 25 (b) ?
Appreciate any help, thanks -
Weak answer choice in Necessary AssumptionI am a little confused about the weak answer and strong answer choice in necessary assumption question. So it said in the CC that we should always lo…
... the correct answer. For example, PT 24 Section 2, Q17. The AC B ... -
Advice on improving timed LR score?So I've now gotten to the point where I am able to get around 22 points correct in BR /untimed in LR. I am someone who really gets tripped up by the …
... timer (especially in this section) to the point where ... one daily timed LR section this week as I ... scores. I just took PT 62 section 2 (I believe it' ... free) tutoring in this section or knows someone who is ... have great potential in that section (usually score 21+ ... -
PT56.S2.Q23 - Can anyone explain how this is an illegal reversal to me?<a href="https://www.manhattanprep.com/lsat/forums/q23-ecologist-without-the-intervention-of-t579.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.manhattanprep.com/…
... is described here. It is PT 56 Section 2 Question 23. I was ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-56-section-2-question-23/ -
PT9.S2.Q20 - A university should not be encouraged to patent...Can someone explain why the correct answer choice is A for PT 9, Section 2, Question 20?
Can someone explain why the correct answer choice is A for PT 9, Section 2, Question 20? -
PT3.S4.Q20 - Argument Part QuestionCan anyone explain their reasoning for PT 3 Section 4 Question 20 - will never understand it for the life of me.
Can anyone explain their reasoning for PT 3 Section 4 Question 20 - will never understand it for the life of me. -
PrepTest 3 - Section 2 - Question 13Bee -> sting once Sting once ————— Bee A-> B B ————— A A) Spring -> Sneeze nonstop Sneeze —————— Spring C) Old + brittle -> move w…
Bee -> sting once
Sting once
—————
Bee
A-> B
B
—————
A
A) Spring -> Sneeze nonstop
Sneeze
——————
Spring
C) Old + brittle -> move with ... -
PT69.S2.Q15 - How to interpret "except" as a logical indicator in this context?Hi, Could someone please help me with interpreting "except" in this sentence? In order to encourage personal responsibility in adults, societ…
... short premise is originally from PT 69 Section 2 Q15. The way JY ... questions, please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of ... -
Point of Issue - Y/N list or honing in on difference?Hello there. Question on point of issue questions - which is better? doing the list method or reading through and determining the disagreement/agree…
Hey Quinn, a great example of the "MSS" is PT 61, Section 2 Q7.
Notice how Talbert didn't say anything about Chess should be taught. Talbert just lists good factors about chess which you have to imply that Talbert is for chess. -
Negating a Conditional StatementHey guys, I can't remember where this was in the course, but what is the proper way to negate a conditional statment? So for example: ~ (X-->Y)…
If any one is curious the question that I'm looking at with regards to the above is PT 49, Section 2 Question 17 -
Negating a Conditional StatementHey guys, I can't remember where this was in the course, but what is the proper way to negate a conditional statment? So for example: ~ (X-->Y)…
... "Some and Most Relationships." PT 30, Section 2, Q20 has an illustration of ... -
PT35.S2.P4 - ronald dworkin argues that judges arehttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-35-section-2-passage-4-passage/ I am a long-time lurker that is gearing up for the October exam. I really…
Following up on RC: PT 35, Section 2
My specific questions include:< ... -
Weaken, Principle and FlawI've gotten to a point where the only types of questions I'm missing are weaken, principle or flaw questions. I usually am on the right path to the c…
... recently gotten wrong include: Principle: PT 54 Section 2 Q18 (answered A, correct ... answer was C), PT 54 Section 4 Q9 ... answer was A); Flaw: PT 54 Section 2 Q15 (answered B, correct answer ... -
PT74.S1.Q16 - debater: as a pedagogical practiceHi folks, I'm struggling with this question in BR. So I figured I'd post my reasoning and see what you all think of it. Debater: Premise 1:Be…
... as the LSAT (See PT 19 Section 2 Question 1 for a throwback ... -
PT76.S2.Q18 - an article claims that many medical patientsCan someone please explain in a real simple way I read the explanation but I just don't get it with these types of questions Thank you in advance …
... this PT although I did unusually worse on the RC section. Might ... 'd actually recommend re-visiting PT 23, Section 2, Question 16. It hinges ...
