HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 59 | 357 | 427 |
| section | 23.3K | 38.2K |
| 2 | 23.6K | 33.4K |
| question | 29.2K | 48.6K |
| 7 | 6K | 7.4K |
-
Point of Issue - Y/N list or honing in on difference?Hello there. Question on point of issue questions - which is better? doing the list method or reading through and determining the disagreement/agree…
Hey Quinn, a great example of the "MSS" is PT 61, Section 2 Q7.
Notice how Talbert didn't say anything about Chess should be taught. Talbert just lists good factors about chess which you have to imply that Talbert is for chess. -
PT56.S2.Q22 - writing styles high literary qualityThis question is very difficult because I just cannnot understand the stimulus. Could I please get an explanation of this question stem and answer c…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-56-section-2-question-22/ -
PT June 2007.S2.Q5, 11, 18, 20, 22, 24Not quite sure if this is the appropriate category to ask this question, but here goes... I just finished the "Intro to Arguments" lesson and want…
@Sahng-Ah, you can certainly ask these questions here. Have you taken a look at the video explanations? http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-june-2007-section-2-question-01/ -
PT56.S2.Q17 - personal right society's welfareHow I read the stimulus was: say we let Q be the statement "create virtuous people" Glen: I believe Q is most important because P (an alternative)…
... ) carries danger factors greater than 2? Perhaps Glen believes that the ... : 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-56-section-2-question-17 -
Old LSAT QuestionsHi! Is anyone else looking at 10 Actual, Official LSAT Preptests, even though they are less relevant? Let's talk about them here!
Preptest 9, Section 2, Question #23
This is ... finding it really difficult. The question consists of two or statements ... /> How is this diagrammed? The question asks what must be assumed ... -
Old LSAT QuestionsHi! Is anyone else looking at 10 Actual, Official LSAT Preptests, even though they are less relevant? Let's talk about them here!
Preptest 9, Section 2, Question #25
This is a necessary assumption question, I ... think. The question stem is: "The ... -
Old LSAT QuestionsHi! Is anyone else looking at 10 Actual, Official LSAT Preptests, even though they are less relevant? Let's talk about them here!
Addressing PrepTest 9, Section 2, Question #23:
I'm ... -
Where is the lesson on negating embedded conditional statements?I just need some clarification now how NOT (A--->B) turns into A and /B.
... this all in Preptest 42 Section 2 Question 19. -
Parallel Reasoning Tips?Hey guys, I've noticed more parallel reasoning questions on recent PT's, and, with my luck, they're also the only ones persistently giving me trouble…
... prep test 57.
Section 2 Question 8.
"A psychiatrist argued ... />
This is compared to Section 3 Question 20.
"Every ... -
Explanation?Hi JY! I don't quite understand this answer choice as I eliminated option A and B as they mention water levels - which aren't specifically addressed …
I believe the OP is referring to PT 20 Section #1 Question 1 -
Necessary and sufficientI understand that this is probably a dumb question but I keep having difficulties with flaw questions that have answers that "confuse necessary and s…
... I was working on PT 73 section 4, question 25:
I ... -
Search function?Is there a specific search box for the discussion board (not control + F)? Am I just blind?
... annoyed if you ask a question that has already been asked ... I posted!
PT 66 Section 4 Question 20.
Conditionals ... -
Weaken, Principle and FlawI've gotten to a point where the only types of questions I'm missing are weaken, principle or flaw questions. I usually am on the right path to the c…
... recently gotten wrong include: Principle: PT 54 Section 2 Q18 (answered A, correct ... answer was C), PT 54 Section 4 Q9 ... answer was A); Flaw: PT 54 Section 2 Q15 (answered B, correct answer ... -
diagramming this out...I'm really stuck. I understand that the correct answer is A, but I can't diagram the logic out. I'm fairly certain it involves subsets, which has alw…
@jspence316 can you post the PT number, section and question number, or the link to the curriculum problem you are talking about? -
Blind Review Group! | PT 52 | Saturday, July 30 | 8pm EST<img src="https://media.giphy.com/media/N8tQVwZRG3X3O/giphy.gif" /> Come to Blind Review Group. All glory to the Hypnotoad. <h1>Saturday, July 30t…
Sung! I lost you! Go to 5:25 and he explains what we were talking about! https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-44-section-2-question-20/ -
"A few" versus "Few"Hi all, So I know "a few" is logically equivalent to "some" (more than 1), but for "few," can we say that it is logically equivalent to the opposi…
... highly problematic. Check out PT 1 Section 4 Question 21 Answers D & ... -
PT62.2.11 - scientist: to study the comparitiveHi, I was not sure about E...the language is so confusing. How should I understand the answer choice and why is it wrong? Thanks in advance! …
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-62-section-2-question-11/ -
PT61.S2.Q24 - historian: it is unlikely that someoneIntuitively I thought what said in the argument is contradicting...I thought people usually learn from history and as they increase knowledge about h…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-61-section-2-question-24/ -
Does this happen to you?It took 2-3 hours to figure out why correct answer is correct...cannot believe it. I have several questions like this per LR section...am I wasting …
... with is Q24 in PT77 section 2...question like this. I don't ... his/her argument and connects 2 different things etc.
And ... when this happen...it took 2-3 hours, sometimes it's ... I can only solve one question on that day...I don ... -
Do you guys draw in the margins during LR?Recently I have been having a lot of success during exercises for LR. This, to me, is a miracle since it was my weakness and what hampered me from br…
... mean: Diagraming conditionals: PT 36 Section 1 question 11. Before I decided ... logic is to this question what mastery over the ... trying to approach the above question without conditional logic: some ... , I can answer the question in 28 seconds. 39 ... -
Panda's guide to answer all SA, PSA, Strengthen and WeakenHi Guys, I think I have spent a lot of effort in coming this up and I want to share with you my hypothesis to see what you guys think about this …
... SA questions. For example: PT 68, Sec 2 Question 23 was, at the ... -
Causation Question StrategyWould somebody mind looking at the strategy below and letting me know if it makes sense/I've included everything? Thanks! On weakening questi…
This is an excellent list that I will be bookmarking. Thank you. PT 29 Section 4 Question 24 is illustrative. A very complex weakening question containing causation. -
PT12.S4.Q22 - a long-term health studyHey All, So we have this health study that found that people who gained approximately 1 pound per year after the age of 35 tended, on the whole, t…
... this, please refer to PT C2 Section 3 Question 15 (Deer). I always ... is how I approached this question.
I always plug RRE ... that______?
So with this question what we have at bottom ... -
PT19.S2.Q04 - scientists analyzing air bubblesThe last 3 words of the conclusion states "such as diatoms." Doesn't that only mean that some of the Antarctic algae COULD be diatoms? Or is that sta…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-2-question-04/
Hey so ... -
Lessons On Numbers/Percentages In Curriculum?This is my biggest problem at the moment, and I don't recall this being in the curriculum. Could someone point this lesson out if I'm missing it? See…
Do you mean questions such as:
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-27-section-4-question-14/
and
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-2-question-18/ ? -
The indicator "even if"Hi, I know that there are many words that indicate what groups (universal quantifiers) you are in. Among them, where does the word "even if" belong t…
... function.
For PT 46 Section 3 Question 24, are you referring ... -
What Exactly is an Intensive?I see them mentioned on here a lot, but, aside from @"Cant Get Right"'s webinars, I rarely see them discussed or practiced much. Could someone explai…
... a necessary assumption. Consider: PT 39-Section 4 Question 19. While I started ... -
Does anyone else think that the recent PT LR Qs punish prephrases?Ok, I might be exaggerating when I say "punish prephrases," but I noticed that the prephrases, especially for the flaw/ assumption type questions, do…
... wonderful advice. I have one question: how is strengthening/ weakening the ... take a look at PT 58 Section 4 question 23.
The ... a five star difficulty strengthening question. I am sure a big ... of the difficulty of this question is answer choice "A" ...
