HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22.1K | 36.7K |
| vs | 2.4K | 2.8K |
| section | 23.4K | 38.4K |
-
Can you diagram "is" and "because"?I was wondering that in relation to PT 56, Section 2, Question 16. Any tips highly appreciated.
I was wondering that in relation to PT 56, Section 2, Question 16.
Any tips highly appreciated. -
Reflection on December14 LSATHi all lovely 7 sagers, just want to write down some reflections I feel for this just finished LSAT and see if anyone, particularly if the 7 Sage ins…
... when I am doing the PT test, I can just finish ... /> Also, I learned from my PT practice experience that, for LG ... RC: I feel the RC section of PT74 (^_^) is somewhat ... term memory. So for any PT RC section, when I am doing ... -
Confusing necessary and sufficient conditionsHello all, I believe I understand the concept of sufficient and necessary conditions and their relationship, however, I am confused when in a flaw qu…
... looks like. For example, in PT 64, section 3, question 11 - one ... -
Cambridge packetsHello again. Me and my drilling questions. I'm preparing for an October retake, but may postpone until December. I have been working through the Ulti…
... should I wait until the PT stage when I have a ... I do them during both PT and Course stages? I'm ... remember the correct answer. PT 73 Section 2 Question 8 I remember ... still have issues at the PT stage, need to review question ... -
Well not sureSo today I did worse on my timed pt vs last weeks but my br went up 20 points ? Still hitting low 150's on pt but mid 160's on br? What exactly doe…
So today I did worse on my timed pt vs last weeks but my br went up 20 points ?
Still hitting low 150's on pt but mid 160's on br?
What exactly does this mean ? -
Diagramming Conditionals without indicator wordsSo I'm two months into studying for the Oct. LSAT and am working on improving my accuracy regarding necessary assumption questions. I encountered 2 p…
... tests (PT 56 Section 3 # 18 "Fund-raiser" and PT 3 Section 2 #3 ... />
For #3 from PT 3 section 2, I was between answer ... -
Pt 54 section 4 question 24"Downtown petropolis boasted over 100 large buildings 5 years ago". By poe I kind of am able to get to the answer E , bUT I don't understand why th…
"Downtown petropolis boasted over 100 large buildings 5 years ago".
By poe I kind of am able to get to the answer E , bUT I don't understand why that is the answer.
Why "significantly fewer than 60"?? Is 100 the staple number of buildings ... -
PT35.S2.P4 - ronald dworkin argues that judges arehttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-35-section-2-passage-4-passage/ I am a long-time lurker that is gearing up for the October exam. I really…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-35-section-2-passage-4-passage/
section of PT 35, section 2 passage 4 - Dworkin ... -
Pt 67 section 2 problem 11Why is the answer e?? I thought the best was a. I don't understand why sulfur 33 is rarely found. I thought what they had found were HIGHER THAN NORM…
Why is the answer e?? I thought the best was a. I don't understand why sulfur 33 is rarely found. I thought what they had found were HIGHER THAN NORMAL concentration. Meaning today's diamond could still have s33 but less of it.
Halp. -
pt 58 section 4 #17Premise ~Nobility -----> ~ Tragedy (~ = negative) Conclusion ~Fate -------> ~ Tragedy It is obvious we must link the concept of Nobili…
Premise
~Nobility -----> ~ Tragedy
(~ = negative)
Conclusion
~Fate -------> ~ Tragedy
It is obvious we must link the concept of Nobility and Fate. Making D right.
My ... -
pt 65 section 4 # 14Main Point question, I agonize between B and E. B is wrong because they never said it was not the only factor? But isn't E wrong as well because t…
Main Point question, I agonize between B and E. B is wrong because they never said it was not the only factor? But isn't E wrong as well because the conclusion was about unlikely that a prediction will occur where as E said probably will not? Isn't E ... -
PT 41, Section 3, Question 3I don't know why this trips me up SO BADLY, but I ended up switching this one to the correct answer in my BR. BUT, I watched the video and I reasone…
I don't know why this trips me up SO BADLY, but I ended up switching this one to the correct answer in my BR.
BUT, I watched the video and I reasoned it differently.
We're taught that, if we're given a premise, we have to take it to be true, ... -
PT. 22 Section 2 Question 22Clearly I'm having a hard time mapping out logic... Can someone please explain the correct answer? Also any tips on how to improve mapping out logic …
Clearly I'm having a hard time mapping out logic... Can someone please explain the correct answer? Also any tips on how to improve mapping out logic would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks! -
PT 29/ Section 1/ Question 8Can anyone explain the incorrect answer choice "B" because I'm having trouble getting through the convoluted way it's written?
Can anyone explain the incorrect answer choice "B" because I'm having trouble getting through the convoluted way it's written? -
Science Experiments in LR QuestionsPowerscore claims that recently PTs have had a lot more science experiment questions in LR. I've obviously taken a bunch of science classes and know …
... />
For example, on PT 71 Section 3 #4, E is the ... -
PT 60 Section 1 Q24 WTF?Frustrating question.. The first line states "Mammals cannot digest cellulose and therefore can't directely obtain glucose from wood.." I chose an…
Frustrating question.. The first line states "Mammals cannot digest cellulose and therefore can't directely obtain glucose from wood.."
I chose answer A, which states that "mammals obtain no benificial health effects from eating cellulose."< ... -
A confusion between conditional logic and causationHi 7sagers, I just had a confusion cause by PT 68 section 2 question 24. JY's explanation is if Hormone causes Stress, then reducing Hormone can redu…
... had a confusion cause by PT 68 section 2 question 24. JY ... -
PT 70, Section 2, Question 6Hi, On this question I narrowed it down to C and D. But even though I've read a couple explanations on it, I don't see why D is glaringly wrong. I f…
Hi,
On this question I narrowed it down to C and D. But even though I've read a couple explanations on it, I don't see why D is glaringly wrong. I feel like C isn't fair enough because it has words like "chance" and "try to identify" which means ... -
PT 23 Section 3 Question 12Sooooo inferences are usually much more clear and this one is giving me a lot of trouble. I gave B a considerable amount of thought, but I felt like …
Sooooo inferences are usually much more clear and this one is giving me a lot of trouble. I gave B a considerable amount of thought, but I felt like it's a flaw because it goes from health food enthusiasts to saying in general, those who take XYZ will ... -
Can someone help explain difference between two similar questions.I'm having trouble understanding the logical difference between very similar sufficient assumption questions. The questions are from PT 36 SECTION 1 …
... questions are from PT 36 SECTION 1 #18 and PT 63 SECTION 1 #10 ... . I'm having trouble understanding why for PT ... conclusion is correct but for PT 63 an answer choice (D ... -
PT 66 Section 2 Question 13: Brooks: I'm unhappy in my....Okay, this question has got me. I'm BRing it, and I honestly cannot rule one answer out with confidence. That never happens. A, C, and D all seem pre…
Okay, this question has got me. I'm BRing it, and I honestly cannot rule one answer out with confidence. That never happens. A, C, and D all seem pretty subjective to me, "mischaracterizing what Brooks says", "unhappiness varying in intensity of ... -
PT 20 / Section 1 / Question 9If AC "C" only said "children tend to have more acute tastes: therefore, they zero in on foods with the most distinctive tastes" I would have seen it…
If AC "C" only said "children tend to have more acute tastes: therefore, they zero in on foods with the most distinctive tastes" I would have seen it as being the correct AC right away, but instead this answer goes on to state they get sick more often than ... -
PT 71 Section 1 #15I need some help on this MSS question The stimulus states that some vitamin-fortified foods have 100% recommend daily intake of vitamin A and D. W…
I need some help on this MSS question
The stimulus states that some vitamin-fortified foods have 100% recommend daily intake of vitamin A and D. We also know from the stimulus that some (many) people overestimate the serving size of vitamin- ... -
PT 26 Section 4 Bus GameHello, I am having a trouble understanding this rule: H occupies the aisle seat immediately behind G's aisle seat. Why are we putting G in the ais…
Hello, I am having a trouble understanding this rule:
H occupies the aisle seat immediately behind G's aisle seat. Why are we putting G in the aisle seat? What about this:
3 _ H
2 G _
1 _ _
Isn't ... -
PT 73 Section 3 Game 2Hey all, can someone explain to me why BOTH X and Y don’t have to be before Z? For example, for question number 8, JY said for answer choice C, X c…
Hey all, can someone explain to me why BOTH X and Y don’t have to be before Z?
For example, for question number 8, JY said for answer choice C, X can go before Z as long as Y goes after Z. I am having trouble with my fundamentals, please help, ... -
Mapping Logical Reasoning: Do we have a set of questions available?Hi Everyone! I've been doing a lot of work recently with memorizing valid inferences that can be made from conditional and inter-sectional statem…
... set of questions similar to PT 43, Section 3, Question 9, beginning ... -
"Only" Question<b></b>I'm having trouble translating "only" statements... can anyone help me out? For example: <b>Only</b> the best artworks are beautiful. (P…
... the best artworks are beautiful. (PT 49, Section 4, Question 16)
PT48.S2.Q19 (G4) - three folk groupsPT 48 Section 2 (LG) Q.19 Questions asks: Which one of the following groups must perform earlier than 10? Does that mean it includes 10? …
PT 48 Section 2 (LG) Q.19
< ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-48-section-2-game-4/Flaw questions: Sufficiency necessity confusionI got a question for high scorers; when you see an argument like PT 22 - Section 4 - Question 21 that have sufficiency necessity confusion but you de…
... you see an argument like PT 22 - Section 4 - Question 21 that ...
