I have a quick question I am confused on. Does ... the hardest? As in, would question 1 be the easiest and ... then question 25 (or whatever the last ...
... recommending reading the LR question stem first and figure out ...
However, there are some question stems referring to a specific ... /lsat_explanations/lsat-25-section-4-question-05).
So, ... it if I found the question stem containing too many ...
That question came up in a recent ... %
C 365 20.53%
D 367 20.64%
E ... )
A 179 20.55%
B 180 20.67%
C ... 47 20.61%
B 47 20.61%
C 46 20.18 ... 21.76%
E 44 20.37%
Total 216
... 3-22, the Paradox-Except question. The first layer of difficulty ... />
The first lesson this question provided me was not to ... />
The next lesson this question taught me what was both ... />
Lesson #2 this question taught me: you are going ...
For LR clearly. When you see a question involves heavy Lawgic say MBT MBF Parallel reasoning etc.. Do you start mapping the lawgic right away or read it first then read it again and Map it out?
Not all X are Y. Is this translated as X some (not)Y? Also, is Not all X are Y equivalent to X some Y? For the latter question, I know in English in certain contexts, the statement "not all" of something implies "some are."