I second @"Nilesh S"
I'm pretty sure it would be against rules to post actual screenshots of the stimulus. But if you use referencing such as "PT 35 S1 Q15" and then post your question about it, then it should be alright.
Sorry about the uber lack of response. Been out all week (as in sick, not fun because who has fun besides studying while studying for the LSAT). Will be there PT52, Monday 8PM
@Sapphire We're reviewing PT52 this Monday, 8PM EST! Taking out the section in my book as we speak. :-) Beyond this week, I'm envisioning that we'll continue in the 50s and 60s... June is quite soon after all.
I'm talking about the Misc Category from 7Sage for example PT 40 S1 Q10, Q15. I see now that I can just figure out the type myself. Like Q10 is something like an Identify the Disagreement type.
@JuliaZLSAT PT52 is September 2007, June 2007 is the free PT that LSAT provides so I think they just skipped it in the numbering (or it's listed in some places as 51.5).
@jac376 said:
Flaw: The correlation of Ra, C, and (C --> Rh) does not mean there is a causation from C to Ra. The answer which strengthens this argument will show that (Rh --> Ra) (C causes Ra because it causes Rh which causes Ra) or directly ...