Is doing the bundle 1-35 still a good idea in order to master games? Because people are saying now the games are different from the older games. Once I finish the CC on games how should I full proof? Should I do 1-35? Or for example 15-49?
... to take my first LSAT ever. I remember reading ... to **really** learn the LSAT, like from the bottom up ... can't learn the LSAT, and advice for anyone ... for a stronger LSAT.
1) The LSAT is VERY learnable ... to get a better LSAT instead of rushing into ...
I just signed up to 7Sage today. I have previously written 4 PTs and wish to just plug in my scores so I can add those to the analytics. However, when I try it thinks I want to take those PTs digitally. I was actually able to plug in 2 of the PTs in with ...
Have there been misc games in the recent tests? I am full-proofing LGs in PTs 1-35 and don't want to spoil the more recent tests for myself but would like to know if I should be dedicating equal time on the misc games as much as the rest?
... to go through tests from 1-35 and the pts I completed ... recently. I have already foolproofed 1-35 as well. On each test ... out and go -0 to -1, so I think I may ...
... down from -3 average to -1/0? I am currently averaging ... done every game from PT 1-35 multiple times and am not ... , but I tend to make 1 costly error like misreading a ...