I think as soon as I understood the invalid formal argument form of most before most:

A -m-> B -m-> C

____________

A -m-> C

It became 10x easier to find the same reasoning in the answer choices.

Took me 1-2 minutes!

chat im cooked

I went about it this way ...

medicine:

ethical -> when nonuse would be sig more harmful than its use

gov intervention

justified -> when non-gov intervention would be sig more harmful than intervening (AKA answer D)

hope this helps?

E was attractive but the use of ONLY was a flag. So, I was confident in my choice of B.

I almost chose E, but I recognized that green carnations being difficult to grow was a sub-conclusion, not the actual conclusion!!

This one was TOUGH but I got it right!!

@goodluckonthelsatguys yesss. I think once you can pinpoint what the conclusion is, it becomes simple to understand what the premise is.

I am on a rolllllllll. WOOHOO!

@ElleJ this is great advice!!!

gonna hop on the bandwagon and also suggest this be a video :(

I chose D but B was the last answer choice I crossed out before choosing D. B was enticing but the word "counterexample" didn't fit because the author wasn't necessarily providing a counterexample (aka another causal phenomenon) they were just providing an alternative hypothesis/explanation.

I geeked out over this lesson. Everything clicked!!!

I can't stop thinking about that chappell roan song

got it correct... yessssssss

I too am confused. I thought "All" negates to "Some".

X-Wings -> Have Hyperdrives

X-wings <- s -> have hyperdrives

I don't understand why it would be X-wings <- s -> /have hyperdrives ???

@andreabear BRUH lol

@8M_M8 ^^^

y'all 9:50 lmao

I struggled with most of these but the last one was a piece of CAKE

@funkmastericejj the last two were tough but the video makes sense!

3/5 ROUGH

5/5 yayyyyy