I did some Kaplan classes before 7Sage. I'm having much more success in 7Sage and the videos are a huge part in that for each question. But the one term I really liked from Kaplan, was "mismatched concepts".
I struggled with SA questions more than any other question, in part because I didn't fully understand the P->C Bridge as 7Sage has explained it. But having both of those together has helped me find a lot more success with SA:
Premise 1: B->C
Conclusion: A->C
The common concept is "C", and the MMC (mismatched concepts) are A and B. So I always know that my answers have to have both A and B mentioned (which normally helps eliminate 1 to 3 of the wrong answer choices that don't have both automatically), and then the correct answer is always the P to C bridge, or the premise that guarantees the connection. (A->B)
I don't know if that helps anyone make sense of it, but it took me way too long to properly understand and then apply the mismatched concept term from Kaplan with the P->C methodology from 7Sage, so hopefully it helps someone else struggling with these question types too.
This curriculum was so hard, does anyone one have any chats or discussion room to go through this part of the curriculum, as I am not fully understanding. I am up for group study to combat this section.
That makes me happy to hear. Just letting you know: the upcoming necessary assumption section fucked me up. I either got upset or just didn't comment lol. I don't think there's any helpful comments from me. I pick back up in the argument part and method of reasoning sections 😂
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
25 comments
I did some Kaplan classes before 7Sage. I'm having much more success in 7Sage and the videos are a huge part in that for each question. But the one term I really liked from Kaplan, was "mismatched concepts".
I struggled with SA questions more than any other question, in part because I didn't fully understand the P->C Bridge as 7Sage has explained it. But having both of those together has helped me find a lot more success with SA:
Premise 1: B->C
Conclusion: A->C
The common concept is "C", and the MMC (mismatched concepts) are A and B. So I always know that my answers have to have both A and B mentioned (which normally helps eliminate 1 to 3 of the wrong answer choices that don't have both automatically), and then the correct answer is always the P to C bridge, or the premise that guarantees the connection. (A->B)
I don't know if that helps anyone make sense of it, but it took me way too long to properly understand and then apply the mismatched concept term from Kaplan with the P->C methodology from 7Sage, so hopefully it helps someone else struggling with these question types too.
Tips for Sufficient Assumption Questions [LSAT Logical Reasoning] by Kevin Lin
^This is the only thing that got me to actually grasp the patterns in SA question argument structures and corresponding approaches.
Please take the time to take notes on this video. It will help.
@arieatsoranges This helped so much, thanks!
@arieatsoranges Thank you! This has been a humbling study day, so I'll take all the perspectives I can get.
I need to completely redo this section. It is JUST not clicking for me :((
@rattata Same twin
Worst section ever...or is it?
@PlayaPlaya no literally
This section started off great and then I lost focus lol I got everything wrong lol
got cooked by this section
we need videos for these reviews
The review section of a module always has the most depressing comments lol
@visschdawg whaddya mean?
This curriculum was so hard, does anyone one have any chats or discussion room to go through this part of the curriculum, as I am not fully understanding. I am up for group study to combat this section.
easily the hardest part of the curriculum for me
This module has been so hard for me.
Side note: maybe it’s a sign to review logic/grammar rules.
I agree. I thinking the same thing for myself
...first..? Is this a new section in this module?
Maybe they just rewrote it and shelved the old one.
Colin, I look forward to your comments. Studying is so dreading, but I see you in every comment section, haha.
Yeah, probably
That makes me happy to hear. Just letting you know: the upcoming necessary assumption section fucked me up. I either got upset or just didn't comment lol. I don't think there's any helpful comments from me. I pick back up in the argument part and method of reasoning sections 😂
LMAOOO i thought i was the only one !! Colin's comments make my day fr
@ColinErickson lmaooooo