For #4 can you say : Some small animals can't move more rapidly than large animals

I still don't understand question 18

In previous grammar videos to negate is to switch the positions. Like A -> B it would be /A -> /B

When does that apply? why is it that negating in this scenario is just denying the relationship?

I have found that a lot of important words to highlight and keep in mind are words I'm not familiar with, therefore wouldn't understand the full grasp of the sentence to apply to my reasoning. How should I approach that?

A Must Be True (MBT) question asks you to identify a statement that is guaranteed to be true based on the information provided in the argument or passage. You need to select the answer that must logically follow from the facts, premises, or details given in the stimulus.

Key Point: The correct answer must be supported by the premises in the stimulus. There cannot be any assumptions or guesses; it should be something that is always true based on what’s given.

I only got this right because I was matching the answer choice conclusions with the stim conclusion. A made the most sense. Not sure if that is the right way of doing things

Took longer but got it right

Was debating between A or B and chose B... this is my entire LSAT experience. Narrowing it down to two choice answers but picking the tempting answer over the right

I got this right then changed my mind doing br... GAH.

I'm so proud that I got this confidently correct. That hasn't happened for a few lessons now lol

That was such an abstract way to write a sentence. The stimulus was not hard at all to understand but couldn't for the life of me figure out what the answer choices were saying. Just kept justifying most of the answers.

This is really helpful. Love this section

Why should you consider other factors, such as the cost of the generator? In many LSAT questions, we’re taught not to overthink and to trust that all the information we need is provided in the stimulus. I didn’t think the cost of the generator was relevant because it seemed outside the bounds of where my focus should be

For question 4 wouldn't it make more sense to have the kernel as "Hurricanes (subject), triggered (predicate)" and then have everything else as modifiers?

During the exam how can you tell if its necessary assumption question or PSA? They are stated somewhat similarly

First 5/5!!!!

Is it bad that I have been using POE this whole time..? just use Poe and look back at the breakdown of the stim. not sure if that's how I should be doing it

I'm in a streak of narrowing down to two answer choices and then picking the wrong one over the right one! I clearly am getting there just need to improve on choosing the right one in the end lol... AGH

I was debating between B and D and chose D GAH

I still don't understand why B is wrong.. Might be the wording that's getting to me but I don't see it considering the candidates who work already in the firm but those who do not. A has weird wording too

I am clearly not understanding sufficient and necessary. I keep getting these types of questions wrong

I literally was hovering over D and then clicked E because I was like what does smoking have to do with anything. GAH. This question was so dumb

D and E seem similar to me. Still can't compute why D is the answer

I feel like this lesson was a doozy

I had a difficult time creating the lawgic for this stim