mostxareyallyarezthusmostxarez
- Joined
- Jan 2026
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
LSAT
Not provided
Goal score: 172
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
2027
Discussions
mostxareyallyarezthusmostxarez
Saturday, Jun 27
hi! question, what is the cancellation policy, if there is one?
mostxareyallyarezthusmostxarez
Wednesday, Jun 10
@M1ckeymina u might be the goat why did this actually help
mostxareyallyarezthusmostxarez
Sunday, Jun 7
5/5 thank god i needed this so bad after the SHITSHOW that was NA
mostxareyallyarezthusmostxarez
Friday, Jun 5
how do we know when a premise is irrelevant vs when it needs to be connected to the conclusion? #help
mostxareyallyarezthusmostxarez
Friday, Jun 5
rushed to answer C without even finishing reading the rest of the answer choices that was on me LMAO but i got it right in br! it did take me like 10 mins tho
im not sure if this is even a valid way of getting to the answer C but this is what I did:
stem says "in most cases in which a planet has been detected orbiting a distant star, the planet's orbit is distinctly oval" and i took just that one part (next part talks about other planets so diff subject).
Then the conclusion says that "some of the planets in oval orbits around distant stars were probably thrown into those orbits by close encounters w other planets orbiting the same stars."
I saw that AC (C) also began with most, and that it shared the first same half as the stem: "in most cases in which planets have been discovered orbiting a distant star." and so that made me think hey most-most you can connect a bridge here, so i kept reading, and sure enough the second half establishes that "more than one planet has been found orbiting the star", just how the end of the conclusion says. so i bridged the extra gap via this inference of most-most-> some and it led me to the right answer!