why is RC eating my booty when everyone else is saying its easier than LR

1/5 a month ago 4/5 today! keep practicing everyone we got this!

@AizazBokhari idk why but this made the question stim make 1000% more sense for me. THANK YOU!

@MarcosGuzman415 this is so true! when i first learned this question type i could not get anything right for the life of me. I took some intentional breaks within my study plan and decided to come back to this and it makes SO MUCH MORE SENSE. please take study breaks everyone, i understand you want to be ambitious/law school apps are getting more competitve BUT you need a break! - from a person who had to delay applying bc they didnt allow themselves to take any breaks in life

are all parallel-flaw conditionals?

for once quantifiers are making sense to me and i was able to get this question right being 1 sec overtime. Shout out shallow dip - > deep dive. and Shout out the random LSAT article i read on quantifiers: https://blog.blueprintprep.com/lsat/an-easy-guide-to-quantified-logic/#

@SavanahHoffstein if you click the "show question" button on the top of your screen under the lesson title, you can!

@VictoriaBermudez kind of like a blanket statement referring to a plethora of situations rather than just one specific instance

why is c written in another language...

@breezyprabahar944 no

this is the first 5 level ive gotten right after doing LR for two weeks!

@tryingmybest-1-1 yea, the whole stimulus felt confusing to me

i think i mixed up "forensic science" and "forensic scientist" which made me disregard a

1/5 and the one correct was a 2 while the rest were 3 and 4

@OmarAlmi this is the same method that was taught in a lesson for PSA question types!

@aaag exactly my thought process, can someone please explain otherwise!?

i was getting these all right in the beginning and now im getting every single one wrong. What's happening....

At first, this didn't make any sense. I thought I understood, but when I started practicing I realized I still hadn't wrapped my head around the Goku analogy (and yes, I watched DBZ). What finally helped was thinking about Weaken questions from a detective's perspective.

For example, suppose the stimulus says:

John's fingerprints were found at the scene of the robbery. Therefore, John is the thief.

My job is not to prove John is innocent or argue that the fingerprints weren't found. Instead, I ask: "What additional fact, if true, would make this conclusion less convincing?"

One possible answer is:

John lives in the house where the robbery occurred.

This doesn't deny any premise or reject the conclusion. The fingerprints are still there, and John could still be the thief. Instead, I've introduced another fact that provides an alternative explanation for why his fingerprints were found. As a result, the original evidence no longer supports the conclusion as strongly.

i feel like i understood weaken question types until it was introduced to be similar to rre. Now im confused and get w and rre mixed up 😐

@AliLazim omg same! i was so confused how i got it wrong twice until i saw your comment 😭

congrats! do you have any advice for breaking into the 160's? My highest PT score was a 155

@KayTON3 your questions isnt dumb! I think that is incorrect because shakespreare is not capturing the era, he captured the spirit of that era. So, era would be a modifier. (im unsure if this makes sense lol)