@JesselynMulet
Gotta wonder which is worse though.
Over confidence errors, or not enough confidence.
Live in Okinawa and am planning on June International exam.
I doubt anyone will live near me, but it's cool to meet virtually.
@LawyeRell Occasionally. I recommend checking if your browser needs an update. This will happen on other sites if chrome or something is out of date.
@LauraBolivar
What got me to get B was that D specifies the conditions in which the killer is applied normally (which we don't know anyway, but it says if true, so...). Still, it doesn't attack the biggest reason for the conclusion. The breakdown.
It is tricky because it talks about the variety of testing situations, but we don't know those, and the premise discusses the variety of soil within context of breakdown of chemicals.
So, B sat stronger to me as it discussed this point.
I think this is also a question that shows the importance in understanding your conclusion.
Conclusion here states why LONG TERM training is unwarranted.
Answer should address Long Term (directly... I think
@woffutt In shakespear's time, actors were not actually given a full script. That being said, the first line of both choices can't be assumed.
Actors: Can we say they own or don't own the play? (No. We can only say they receive their parts for sure.)
Spectator: Can we say they own or don't own the play? (No. We all know people who have seen Harry Potter, but not read a single word of the book.)
So, we have to go on the second statement and fact.
Can a spectator replicate one characters lines perfectly? (or speech?) Maybe. Like Prozd on Peter Pan. BUT maybe not.
How about actors: Well, almost most definitely (still an assumption, but not a stretch) they know their own part quite well. Do they know the others? Maybe, but maybe not. BUT they know at least their own.
So, if you are between C and D. Considering the first line is an assumption on both (And if you are a literature historian, not even that), then the second line would b the determining spot. (At least this was how I took it.)
Another where I had to re-read the answers. A seemed very obvious after that.
Reading CAREFULLY was really required.
Less Car thieves now (in my mind, this was a check (something in stimulus addressed: Great)).
Next part, I had to make an example in my head to understand it.
Tom steals a car 5 years ago, BUT he leaves it literally down the street (must have driven like 10 secs). So, owner didn't notice, did or didn't call cops until the morning maybe, but Tom was long gone.
BUT NOW, Tom stole the car, and drove it until the morning. The owner comes out, sees car missing, calls cops. Tom could be caught. Tom could be charged. Tom could be convicted.
In my mind. BAM! Check for the other part of the stimulus.
Unfortunately, this took 1:25 over for 3:07. But considering time saved on easier questions... maybe... plus just a right answer in general, I'm happy. Better to know a correct answer on one question than guess on 3 others.
Time to watch the video now.
@TMoney
D was the only one he crossed out. The rest he circled. In other words, A, B, C, and E are explanations. And D is not. His answer was D. You are correct, but he didn't mis-speak on anything. His answer was also D.
Having this 'supposed' to be done in 1min is absolutely diabolical. 1:24 here. But correct is correct.
@HelainaLaCoste
I just thought it made far too broad a statement with no back up.
We are told most well-designed public places feature art work. AND all coffee houses are public places.
But this can't tell us that most well-designed coffee houses are anything.
Maybe (cause I don't know if I would go here without seeing an answer choice with it), the most it could say is SOME coffee houses that are well designed feature artwork. This is still a stretch, I think.
But if you remember the buckets. Try and think:
Scoop up coffee houses (lets say 100 out of 110) and put in Well designed.
BUT, what if well designed had 1,000,000 public places. And now, only 100 coffee houses are in that bucket. Let's say, for simplicity, the rest are restaurants.
Now, if you take a scoop (let's say 600,000) of well-designed, the probability of getting EVEN ONE coffee house almost nothing compared to restaurants. You COULD get one, but we are trying to find MUST be true, not could be true.
This is a breakdown of it, but really, in the end, it made a specific statement that was a bit extreme for the information provided. Hopefully this info is helpful. If not, my b.
@lmfreed
Same with me. I had logic mapped out, and answer chosen immediately. But my 'common sense' said: "Naaaah. That doesn't make sense. Read it again."
Of course, the answer didn't change. And B was chosen.
@LawyeRell
Same here. I took much longer on this one, but considering time saved on other problems (idealy), better to get answer completely right than chance a wrong answer for speed.
@EdithM
I was thinking this too, but am too scared to test that 😅. I'd rather just read both to be safe.
@JohnThorn
To the right of the question stem, there is a small flag. Click it. This is identical to what you will see on the test.
@BrandonSchittone
Totally agree. The flaw 'cheat-sheet' before was a big one for me too. It really nailed down some of that vocab.