Bruh I keep getting them wrong initially, then picking the right one on blind review. Ugh.

I feel like this explanation is overcomplicating things. Why are we putting our MSS hats on?

having trouble coming up with good low-res summaries. Any tips?

I thought A would be correct because it is precluding an alternative hypothesis. Webs other than the Glomosus webs that have the UV component did not reflect the UV light, so the Glosmosus web is what attracts the insects, and no other alternatives.

Can someone reassure me? ;'( I feel super behind (my LSAT is in 2 weeks) and I have been studying for 3 months, but my diagnostic is super low... I am probably going to take the LSAT again a few more times, but feeling discouraged.

Anyone here from the strengthen weaken logical reasoning section -_-

This is so confusing!

This really needed to be a video. What is going on here

The wording for the answer was so confusing even though I got it right. Grammar really is important.

Honestly kinda like the RC better than logical reasoning! And I am terrible at reading. The more you know.

I wish Kevin was with me to take the LSAT...

Somehow got this right... But answer B was tempting. I read a little bit of Snell's perspective and how it tied together with Barbu's, and question D used somewhat the same verbiage. Thats why I went with it, but I don't know if that tactic helps for every passage on the test...

I am so confused why B incorrect and C is correct. I read the explanation over and over but its not clicking.

LSAT in 30 days.. I feel so unconfident, but I have been studying since July (3 months)... I don't feel ready at all.

Law and Econ major here! Brough me back to the good ole days learning about utility maximizations and cost curves :')

had to quickly look up the word "cogent"... I feel dumb XD

Guys my LSAT is in November am I cooked im worried. I started studying in July and I feel behind tbh.

#feedback I am having trouble knowing the difference between non-causal and causal arguments, with the strengthening and weakening mixed in with both. I feel like every question is different and I can't tackle it the same way. I have gone through this lesson twice over and I still dont get it. I looked at the causal argument lessons in the core section and it didnt help :(

this is frustrating as I got a 141 on my first ever LSAT and I know damn well she probably got at least a 160. Cant get into any law school with my score, while shes out here scoring fine and could probably get into a few law schools at least with her first score. I am trying to see the motivation but it would help to see someone with more realistic goals ;'(

i am cooked.

Ok, these easier questions really help me understand better. And they definitely boost my confidence that I know what I am doing.

I got this one right, but for a different reason. I immediately eliminated A and B because it mentioned "big beaked" birds, but in the stimulus it is only talking about average-sized beaked birds and a population that beaks have shrunk. So therefore A and B are wrong because there are no "big-beaked" birds. Is this another assumption we are making?

Why would A be right if the people thought his performance was poor but the stimulus says that people judged that his performance was excellent???? I am so confused my brain hurts.

C was tempting. But I went with E. But the explanation for C being wrong is still confusing to me. Can someone please explain?

Just tanked my November LSAT... found myself coming back here. We got this :') i think...