- Joined
- Jul 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
omg got #4 correct in under a few seconds. Light work. (I got the rest wrong)
back here after 8 months of studying.... this stuff is important I promise!!
@arwhite598618 I think it would stay constant. If you fire the 10 workers, that doesn't guarantee the absentee rate will go down or up. The author needs to show that the absentee rate won't drop to support their conclusion that productivity would not be impacted. Without the author stating B, the conclusion cant be properly drawn.
How is C incorrect?! Intuitively it makes sense. I know the critic is making a claim about Vierne's music and not all organ music, but cmon!
Hi all,
I have been studying since the end of last July and took the LSAT for the first time in November, scoring a 141. It was demoralizing, but I knew I wasn't going to get the best score since I was relatively new to the LSAT. I got the experience, re-evaluated, took a month off for the holidays, and got back into it in the beginning of January this year. It is now March, and my highest PT score is a 147. I just took another one, and I dipped to a 144... So frustrating! I got a tutor, and he got me on the right track, but I felt like it wasn't very helpful. I have been drilling specific LR types, wrong answer journaling, and then taking PTs at the end of each week. I average about 2 hours of studying a day with one rest day. I have listened to podcasts, got advice from friends, but I can't seem to improve my score :( I am starting to second guess myself and get in my head thinking my heart isn't in it. But I don't really have any motivation to study now because I feel like I have been wasting my time these past 8 months. Maybe I'm burnt out. Does anyone have suggestions on what I should do, or what I could be doing wrong? I know people on here have been suggesting to review the CC again, and I did that, but I feel like it confused me more, and as a result I had that dip in my PT scoring from a 147 to 144. Ugh. Help would be appreciated :'(
but why is A wrong? The passage says "For one thing, volunteering damaging information early may create an image of credibility" is this too vague to assume "a short time" can be used in connection to the term "early" ??
@xyzana YES. sometimes using your intuition is a better tool than mapping it out. These modules are just other tools that can help prevent you from confusing sufficiency and necessity, because most times on the test your intuition may not help. These are good to rely on when all else fails.
OMG I thought "falls apart" meant thats when the Methane is detectable... i feel stupid
@laurennhaumesser783 me too! I went with D though because I took "chief" as "only"... man I need to bone up on my grammar :/
this was strung out wayyy too long in my opinion. i feel like i lost concentration on what we were looking for.
where can i review rule application reasoning? i think thats why both NA and SA questions are so hard for me.
@meepmeep same here. after I read the stimulus I try and find the gap in my head before I look at the answers. A was the assumption I came up with IN MY HEAD before I even looked at it. Ugh.
"i wish you good luck" bro after the sufficient assumption module i need a miracle
i got this right with 50 seconds over. i didn't map anything out but i did keep the concepts in mind when looking for answers. if this sufficient for future questions? or should we map it out?