I don't understand why the split and sequential approaches are done on the same passage. If they were different passages I could compare the use of each method, but since it's the same text with the same questions there is no value once one of the approaches has covered it. It would be nice to use all of the materials to their fullest, but I suppose we are expected to pick one approach and ignore the other.
#feedback is it ok not to even go over the sequential approach if the split approach works better? I find that the sequential approach is often more complicated because you have to try and retain the information. which can be hard to do, especially in heavy jargon passages.
How does a caveman even know what he looks like? They didn't have mirrors back then. I call BS on the identification and empathy hypothesis. No mother ever thought, "Oh, I'll help my injured baby because she kind of looks like me". I'm siding with passage B on this one.
They also grew up with family/nomadic groups with similar genes, which makes them know what people who look like them look like. They might not know what they look like, but they know what their siblings, parents, aunts, uncles, etc look like.
@rshang9368 look down at ur arms, legs and torso, the only thing you can’t see is your head, neck and back. You could definitely tell whether or not an organism was the same as u or not
15 comments
I don't understand why the split and sequential approaches are done on the same passage. If they were different passages I could compare the use of each method, but since it's the same text with the same questions there is no value once one of the approaches has covered it. It would be nice to use all of the materials to their fullest, but I suppose we are expected to pick one approach and ignore the other.
@thr107 I second this!!
Gifted stick figure
Science passages will forever be the death of me. I just can't comprehend much of what's being said on them :(
Lol, Kevin's so funny!
lol this passage was literally the topic I wrote in my capstone thesis
sooooo much easier to digest these dense passages when you actually care about the information at hand lol
#feedback is it ok not to even go over the sequential approach if the split approach works better? I find that the sequential approach is often more complicated because you have to try and retain the information. which can be hard to do, especially in heavy jargon passages.
@gastoncaleb14165 I agree with you!
How does a caveman even know what he looks like? They didn't have mirrors back then. I call BS on the identification and empathy hypothesis. No mother ever thought, "Oh, I'll help my injured baby because she kind of looks like me". I'm siding with passage B on this one.
there were likely other ways to see a reflection, water for example
They also grew up with family/nomadic groups with similar genes, which makes them know what people who look like them look like. They might not know what they look like, but they know what their siblings, parents, aunts, uncles, etc look like.
consider from the perspective of race.
@jjjjffff there weren't a lot of different races interacting tho?
@rshang9368 look down at ur arms, legs and torso, the only thing you can’t see is your head, neck and back. You could definitely tell whether or not an organism was the same as u or not