I have really enjoyed this site, and my membership. The analytics are unmatched, the lessons are wonderful.

My only concern is that your website is so much easier on the eyes than the LSAC site is. I know how utterly ridiculous that sounds.

The first time I drilled on 7sage, I realized that my eyes did not face the same fatigue that they did on LSAC. I actually got concerned at how comfortable it was.

This is a longshot, but are there visual themes available that would be more similar to LSAC's site, so that I can practice more similarly to the way the test is going to be?

Maybe I am alone in the blue-light fatigue I experience on LSAC, but it doesn't seem to happen nearly as much here. It's been great in terms of allowing me to drill for longer without feeling exhausted, but I am concerned I am setting myself up for failure in a sense, by practicing on nicer equipment than I'll have for the test....Does this make any sense or am I just utterly looney tunes?

Just want to give KUDOS to the design team/administrators! Ya'll ask what we wanted, we told you, and you listened!! Thanks and great job!!

I love the highlighted bar that describes your accuracy on certain question tags relative to the 175+ scorer. It would be cool if there was another bar that also included timing. This could let me know if there are types of questions I spend much longer on without having to look looking at each individual question or drill set to see where I stand for timing.

I really like the new score goal setting for the analytics (thanks!), but having taken over 2,000 questions it's really hard to gauge how much I'm actually improving, since moving the percentages takes a ton questions. If there was a way to see how I've performed over the last 2 weeks (or any user defined amount of time) in my analytics, in combination with how that aims towards the goal score, I think that would give me a better idea of how i look at this moment, as opposed to including a bunch of data from when i was really bad at this stuff.

It would be so helpful if we were able to do the Blind Review but without marks from "taking too long to answer the questions." I would prefer if the Blind Review would just let us know to check which answers are incorrect.

You can import your LawHub PrepTests in your settings.

Should we auto-import your PrepTests by default? For example, we could periodically check if you have LawHub PrepTests and import them in the background, with a setting to opt out of this behavior.

To put the question another way, should LawHub import be opt-in (status quo) or opt-out?

Hi all at 7sage,

I know you all have said you're working on letting accommodated test takers (and anyone who desires it) remove the experimental/any section from analytics consideration, but I just wanted to throw my hat in the ring that this is urgent. My analytics are literally nearly unusable because they count my experimental which I do not do. I have the accommodation and cannot practice under my test conditions AND have accurate analytics at the same time. This makes 7sage's usefulness very low in terms of just the infrastructure of drilling, for me. I'm hoping this can be a top priority for myself and others with accommodations, but I know you have a lot on your plate, and am grateful for everything you're doing as well as for your continual improvements.

Thanks!

On the actual LSAT it always shows a brief description before the section begins while the break timer has started. So I know what section I'm about to go into before going into it and I get to mentally prepare for RC vs LR during that minute. 7Sage just has a screen with a timer, it would be nice if this description or a similar one could be included.

It's really sad that only LSATLab seems to have this option. I like the UI of 7sage better but this is forcing me to use another platform.

1. On this new website, I do not like how you cannot see the time stamp as the video is playing. Like you aren't able to skip forward and put where you want to watch, as the video is playing.

2. I wish you would have the total time it took you to drill when you are going over your answers.

The expected accuracy feature, which plays into analytics and priority tags, makes no sense. Say I have consistently scored 155-160 on all of my PTs, but my goal score is a 170, how am I supposed to reach that if it's giving me priorities based on other people in my current score range??? It could say that I have a "low priority' for a specific tag, just because I'm on level with people in my range, but if that range is lower than I am aiming for, it's not a low priority. This feature should be completely overhauled with the option to specifically choose a score range goal, and then it shows the accuracy needed to obtain that range.

If I am misunderstanding something, please help explain JY #feedback

It would be helpful if a feature could be added to pin specific drills taken to the top of the list for easy reference later.