- Joined
- Feb 2026
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
@JackieNguyen Shallow passes should eliminate most answer choices:
A: the word IF in the conclusion throws it out before a deep dive
B: The conclusion "most pharmacies sell cosmetics" doesn't match.
C: C contains the word unless which doesn't match
D: Virtually every pharmacy "that" sells shampoo also sells toothpaste does not match.
E is the correct answer and does not contain anything that should fail a shallow pass.
Deep diving a question like this is either a test of your mental "RAM" (how many things you can hold in your active thought process at one time) or ability to diagram. But as I show above you somewhat comfortable eliminate every answer in this particular question without doing a deep dive at all.
I very much appreciate the work that goes into making the 7Sage tester as identical as possible to the actual Law Hub interface. It makes a big difference and impacts my decision to continue subscribing to 7Sage.
I typically prefer when AI chats don’t reset, so they remember my conversations and build on it.
Maybe a manual reset button would be a good compromise here.
In the exact same spot. I think some of it may also result from the PTs being the most recent question types as opposed to the sections/drilling I've been doing.
Also, I am trying to work on stamina by taking multiple sections (or drills with 4 passages or 25 questions) in a row during my practice sessions. I was also advised to practice in the morning before my work, which I recently started.
@SerinJ Thank you so much for the response. After considering it, I agree with you that my under PT-ing and under stamina training might've had a negative effect on my exam. I also moved my studying time to morning in hopes that will help!
@MariahMay29 A drill is a group of questions. When you create a drill, you select which question types and timeline you'd like. All of the questions are real. Given the questions you're asking, I would recommend you follow a study plan that includes the lessons sections.
I was quite concerned about the timeline of my AW approval because I took it with a less than ideal camera. I wrote my section on Tuesday 6/9 and was relieved to receive an email one week later on 6/16 saying that mine was approved.
I received 0 communication from LSAC between submitting my writing and it getting approved.
Hello,
I have completed the 7 Sage Study plan including the lessons and felt it helped me greatly. While I have not yet received an official score, I have improved from a 155 blind PT to averaging 168-172 on PTs and Drills.
I am now at a point where I score -0 to -3 on LR and average -3 on RC (both need improvement).
I attribute much of this improvement to the study plan generated by 7 Sage which I strictly followed until my September test. After completing the plan and getting to a high level, I am wondering if it makes more sense to generate a new plan, or study using my own plan/schedule (within 7 sage).
My self-generated study plan has been to complete 1 section a day (alternating between LR and RC) and then drill any question types I got wrong as much as my day allows (I work). I also plan to start taking PTs on the weekend (something I typically do not look forward to but need to get in the habit of). While I've seen improvement, primarily in my RC, I question if I could be improving at a faster rate using the 7 Sage generated Plans.
Of course, no matter how I approach questions, I always review deeply those I got wrong or was unsure about. I feel this is the most important part of LSAT prep.
Does anybody, particularly with insight into how the study plans are generated, have a recommendation or can provide clarity on if it is actually more efficient to use the 7 Sage generated plan after completing one "round" of it?
I plan on taking August & September and feel every point is worth the struggle (be it for admissions or scholarship) until that date.
Might be time to pick a law school with a lower lsat median.