Hi, I have the Live subscription and am unable to find the "Ask a Tutor" button - where should I navigate to on 7sage to find that feature? I had a quick follow up question from one of the Foundations lessons.
- Joined
- Jan 2026
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Discussions
@Jsonf I also thought this. I'm still not understanding why the "while there is no point..." is not author's opinion.
I'm confused because in the prior SA questions, we had to explicitly search for the desired conclusion in the answer choices, and now, we're still technically doing SA questions but looking for the desired conclusion is not a criteria anymore? could someone help explain how this is the case
Do you recommend diagramming/writing out Lawgic or notes on the test? Does time allow for that or should we start doing that in our head?
Just because people are helping detect, how can we assume that more are getting recorded? People could just be helping but doesn't have to mean their efforts are fruitful right?
I'm not really following the whole naive assumption thing. For me, it makes more sense to find an answer choice that is the best hypothesis for the facts. Can someone better explain how assumptions come into play?
With this question, I got caught up in translating the claims using Group 4 indicators (like "not") which threw me off. How did you know to instead interpret the claim using "if"?
3/3 but so bad on time. Will that just come with practice? I'm always 1-3 minutes over the target time.
Can someone explain how in this, "Some alphabets are not phonetic.", the not phonetic became just phonetic? Really struggling with the double negation
How do we know when to bring in general knowledge versus stick to the stimulus? For example, we kind of assumed that racing to develop the vaccine doesn't mean the company is investing all resources right?
But doesn't "some students" imply that the lower bound should be 2, not 1? Since students is plural?
Can someone explain how, in Q5, the referential refers to the "fact"?
@KevinLin Thank you! Just to clarify, could we have used "no" as the indicator and the "negate necessary" rule in Question 3? because I am getting a different answer when I do that.
What contextual information about "Jon must enroll in Economics 101 or Political Science 101 this semester" gives it away that it's the "inclusive" or? Since we need to use context to figure out which "or" it is, I'm confused how it's clear just from reading the sentence that Jon could technically pick both classes. Thx in advance!
Are there two major premises in this? 1) The sentence that "indicates that there is a warm sea" (also the subsidiary conclusion) and 2) the warm sea is a primary factor in the early dev of life. Both supporting the Major Conclusion that we should believe there's life on Europa?
Did anyone else think about Question 1 like this? Context: If these new policies are approved, students will soon be able to freely access their academic records.
Conclusion: However, as a teacher, I believe this would be a blunder.
Major premise/Sub conclusion: First, allowing students full access to their academic records might distract teachers from more significant responsibilities
Minor premise: as they have to organize and provide files.
Major premise: Second, based on my experiences, I've noticed that most students don't express the desire to access their records in the first place.
How is "I'm hugging you because I miss you" not an argument? I thought about it like, "I'm hugging you, and why?" - because I miss you. Isn't the "I miss you" supporting why I am hugging that person?
How could you tell that this paragraph was the author's perspective, versus just the author listing some evidence of the effectiveness of stealing thunder?