- Joined
- Aug 2025
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Discussions
Bruh, I looked at A and was like, "Too obvious." Then I went back to look at it and immediately corrected my error. Shallow dip is definately the way to go.
Ngl, chat, if not for POE, I may not have gotten this one correct. I'm low-key embarrassed to admit that i just didn't understand what option A was saying it, but the other ones felt spiritually wrong, so I just crossed those out. I had to use AI (I'm sorry, guys; I love the planet, I swear) to help me understand what option A was really trying to say.
the flaw made in this argument was that
Bad argument ≠ false conclusion
that's what "repudiates a claim merely on the grounds that an inadequate argument has been given for it" means
like just because your argument is horrible does not necessarily mean your conclusion is false.
I picked E but was thrown off by the 'One kind' of causal relationship. What is the one kind ?
I spent 15 mins, but I got it. i am not ashamed to admit i was talking in circles and even had to involve a friend.
Hey, so I would appreciate literally any answer, but I thought for SA we do P->C. To be fair, the explanations do make sense to me. However, I barely see the P->C thing going on now. I thought the answer choices should be linked to the conclusion, but it seems like right now we're just filling in the gaps. So I want to know how exactly to approach these questions. Or, when do I know when I can use P->C? Any suggestions and tips are GREATLY appreciated.
All in all, I am just so frustated. I take over 15 mins to get even a level 3 question and close to 30 mins to even understand a lvl 4 question. I have about 8 months to study but sometimes it feels like I'm chasing a ghost. I don't even know if I have what it takes.
Hey, so I would appreciate literally any answer, but I thought for SA we do P->C. To be fair, the explanations do make sense to me. However, I barely see the P->C thing going on now. I thought the answer choices should be linked to the conclusion, but it seems like right now we're just filling in the gaps. So I want to know how exactly to approach these questions. Or, when do I know when I can use P->C? Any suggestions and tips are GREATLY appreciated.
Ngl, chat, my brain hurt from this one. i can feel my brain forming new folds
Is it sick and twisted that I lowkey just got this kind of wrong so I could use the correction for my notes? Trust, I didn't know what to look for, so I just went with one I thought was okay, knowing fully well I would get it wrong. I've taken down my notes, so hopefully I get the next few questions correct. Wish me luck, guys! I'll see you in the next question!
took me 9 mins, but I got it!! Biggest shoutout to those that can answer questions under time. Trying to get to that point eventually!! Diagramming helped me a lot in this question
it took me 8 min but i clocked the heck out of that question. 😝😝 i have the worst headache and sore throat but the grind doesn't stop. LETS GO GUYS !!!!!
Okay, y'all, this is low-key throwing my brain through the wringer. So I remember when we did a weaken question that involved the joggers and stretching. The explanation was that those that stretch are already susceptible to stretching. Also the seasickness question. The idea is that those that use the drug are already susceptible to the sickness, so it's not that the drug doesn't work; it just slows it down. That is why I picked E the first time. I eventually got it right in the BR
Needless to say, I struggle with figuring out how/when to plug the concept above into the other weakening.
Please help.
@JosephTrischitta literally same. i was so gassed then i was like oh. okay.
dang maybe i failed successfully but i used the not all that we learned from the negation of all.
Okay, I have a question. So the same way it was implied in the 5th stimulus that controlling is the same as commanding, then why can't we infer that lack of extensive training, which is the negation of extensive training, means that you have more to learn?
I just wanted to ask how to know when to shift gears. I was looking at this from the context of purely logic, so I even turned the first premise into logic. and i somehow took it as context. idk what was going on but i didn't even think to take it as a premise and conclusion sandwich and ended up spending over 30 mins on the question.
i may not be the best at understanding logic but i KNOW shade and clocked it immediately in under 30 secs