I performed process of elimination and also arrived at answer choice B. However, I did not understand the meaning so I didn't select it. Instead I tried harder to find a "correct" answer between A and C. I ended selecting C because I thought the general principle was handwriting analysis being legitimate and the evidence being there is no licensing board.

Doesn't the third negated example, "Being a Jedi does not require being able to use the Force." show a conditional relationship? It can be diagrammed as J > /F.

I am coming from LSAT Lab and there was something about converting -most-> to <-some->. Is this completely wrong? Or what topic does this belong to?

I was attracted to answer choices B and C because the last clauses in each answer sounded like Matilde was interested in its value as an investment. After watching the explanation, I understand Matilde's interest in its value as an investment can occur as long as its not the only reason. Does the word "just" help indicate that? i hope this question makes sense, its hard for me to explain lol

I understand C is the correct choice. However, I am a little confused about answer choice D. What does 7Sage's explanation mean that "unless" can have two translations? Also, why is Group 3 translation rule used and not Group 4 translation rule for "never"?

How do you know which concept to negate? For instance, the example about the rate of violent crimes, how do we choose risen?

the previous skill builder was very hard, but I got all of these right. either this activity was easier or I learned from my mistakes. I hope the latter lol

For the second example. I understand why one possibility is that people are not objective about either subjects. However, why is the second possibility that people are objective about both? The sentence only says less and not "less or equal."

I identified A as people who read nutrition labels and B as people who do not read nutrition labels... rip

A Skill Builder with negative referential would make sense here. This [referential to Skill builder] seems more like continuation of the previous lessons.

@AlenaKane I also did not identify "acted." However, after watching the video, I understand "acted" to be referential to "rejecting the plan..." Without the first clause of the sentence, we would not know how the president acted. I hope this explanation kind of helps lol

how important is it to know which words the modifiers are modifying? I can identify the modifiers, but its tricky to identify the words they are modifying

For the question with the Groundskeeper as a speaker. Why is the second sentence Premise and not Context? It is a premise if we assume "concerts as well as sixty matches a year" is a negative feature. However, we do not know if it is negative. We do not know if concerts + 60 matches is a lot or a little. It seems more like Context as it just reports the events held.

For Q2, isn't the first part of the last sentence a premise? And the remaining portion is the conclusion.