@brookedonnelly04 Took Mine at Mercer University and I can agree it does make Formal Logic tons easier. It's not supposed to make sense thats the worst part, but its valid/unvalid entirely due to reason so the premise proves the conclusion and alot these LSAT questions are framed at the weakness of the argument so the better you are at parsing out valid arguments the better youll be at half of the test at least

@DezerreeSnyder Same honestly it's been a rough day already the humor is quite pleasing

You got this keep going !

@jayprev97 I would have to disagree because thinking back to our ways to identify an argument "just get to the point". What out of all this information did the author intend you to remember. As well there is alot of filler language in questions for example you might read it as such Measurements of the extent of amino acid decomposition in fragments of eggshell found at archaeological sites in such places as southern Africa can be used to obtain accurate dates for sites up to 200,000 years old. Because the decomposition is slower in cool climates, the technique can be used to obtain accurate dates for sites almost a million years old in cooler regions. We can reduce the language though to only what we need. 1.Measurements of extent of amino acid decomp in frags of egshell found at archelogial sites can be used to obtain accurate dates for sites up to 200k years old. 2.Because decomp is slower in cool climates,

3.the technique or 1. can be used to obtain accurate dates for sites almost 1 mil years old in cooler regions because decomp is slower in cool climates or add 1 as validation for reasoning. It's not the best explanation, but I hope it offers some insight.