Bro I genuiny felt like I was gonna die if I didn't get this right, good thing I got it right.

POE is the best way to go, go through each answer choice as think if all of these were true which one most explains the phenomenon

my eyes and brain hurt !

met him last spring he's pretty chill

this is lowkey starting to become easy

third comment !

Wait using the show question button really does help and trying to answer it before. I've really noticed that the right answer most of the time upon close reading differs entirely from the other four answers. I've noticed that three answers will be totally wrong. Then one answer could sound like the right answer but upon close reading as Jp said it adds extra concepts and do so randomly.

Wait process of elimination is goated almost chose E then really just thought it out went through with the answer masking and got it right.

wait ive never noticed this i love you for that

Yes it will haunt you in your dreams forever, until you pass the lsat with a 180. You got this.

Yeah it's honestly starting to become a bit annoying. Instead of even giving us a chance to answer, we're just given the answer first. Doesn't make much sense to me either.

I got it right but it took me 2 minutes lmao. This time is gonna cook me

It's all about being confident in your answer choice, I typically just start by reading the question stim, and answers, then read the stim. Normally the right answer is heavy on referential phrasing. As well I figured out that being confident in your answer choice helps alot. I used to spend alot of time second guessing myself, but you dont have that capability on the LSAT. Once you make a decision go with it. Over time if your wrong through analysis you'll just naturally build a feel for the type of question. It's all about drilling as much as you can in my opinion, so you can really learn the strategic methods of the LSAT writers.

calm little 5/5 for the first time, honestly just drilling on the toughest difficulty has helped me significantly. Done it last night for about an hour and just dug into any questions I got wrong, As well as why I had gotten them wrong. Coming into the drill today it almost felt to easy, but I shall be humbled soon as the next question types come up. Then I'll repeat the same exact method for those.

Hey Guys so um dont feel quite so bad I got a 2 out of 5 on the actual results, done my Blind Review really slowed down and first asked myself what they wanted me to know, and after doing that 5/5. It really helps just to understand the stim most of the time. I actually learned this trick from 7sage's video on how to destroy logical reasoning even when you blank. I recommend that you Guys check it out.

@tst19 hey so I have till around Janurary when I take my test. Do you reccomend doing this as well ?

Be proud that you even had the courage.

Wait guys this might help some of you so group 2 indicators can be a combination of only and group 1 indicators so if you see only think group 2. All and only make two different distincitons.

Wait tip for you guys this make so much sense so a Necessary Clause just think of as being a gatekeeper it tells you more or less what you can't conclude. Remember too the LSAT expects you to make assumptions and feel the reasononing, but if its not in the problem then we shouldn't consider it as possibly even being an idea.

@brookedonnelly04 Took Mine at Mercer University and I can agree it does make Formal Logic tons easier. It's not supposed to make sense thats the worst part, but its valid/unvalid entirely due to reason so the premise proves the conclusion and alot these LSAT questions are framed at the weakness of the argument so the better you are at parsing out valid arguments the better youll be at half of the test at least

@DezerreeSnyder Same honestly it's been a rough day already the humor is quite pleasing

You got this keep going !

@jayprev97 I would have to disagree because thinking back to our ways to identify an argument "just get to the point". What out of all this information did the author intend you to remember. As well there is alot of filler language in questions for example you might read it as such Measurements of the extent of amino acid decomposition in fragments of eggshell found at archaeological sites in such places as southern Africa can be used to obtain accurate dates for sites up to 200,000 years old. Because the decomposition is slower in cool climates, the technique can be used to obtain accurate dates for sites almost a million years old in cooler regions. We can reduce the language though to only what we need. 1.Measurements of extent of amino acid decomp in frags of egshell found at archelogial sites can be used to obtain accurate dates for sites up to 200k years old. 2.Because decomp is slower in cool climates,

3.the technique or 1. can be used to obtain accurate dates for sites almost 1 mil years old in cooler regions because decomp is slower in cool climates or add 1 as validation for reasoning. It's not the best explanation, but I hope it offers some insight.