@JosephWendt never mind it wasn't the author's opinion. freakin bummer of a question

@tylergkohring661 DOH read it carefully... it is not the author's opinion!

The most important distinction to make here is that D is talking about anticipating what later artists might do, not who they will be

@AccountsPlayable I got it wrong for the same exact reason. To play the role of devil's advocate... Suppose you're George Martin and you're listening to the final mix of St. Pepper's. He probably anticipated that future ARTISTS would try to do the same thing hence anticipating what later artists would do, not who they will be.

@JosephWendt or the Beatles making Sgt. Pepper's and knowing that once it comes out that will be the thing everyone wants to do......

@ohchanwu911 DISCLAIMER: I'm playing devil's advocate here, and I got it wrong for the same reason. One or more already existing artists (maybe someone who is well-known but is not innovative) is prone to copying breakthrough styles, and these artists in question can anticipate that their (breakthrough) style will be copied... Sort of like predicting that your favorite house music producer will make dubstep because so and so just got super popular. IDK this question was lame. Good luck on the test!

@joemshashaty969 the author never does. it says they can anticipate "subsequent developments in the arts." I guess this is supposed to be an umbrella term that covers actual artists. It is mesleading because of all of the talk about techniques and social changes etc. I got it wrong for this reason.

@camilob95398, it's literally punishing you for the exact thing you're trained to do on this test. Soft.

@tylergkohring661 ding ding ding

"It provides that it lacks legal power over the extent of its legal power." So it can't make unilateral decisions? Am I a backwards person? This is plausible as well...

@Kevin_Lin, Yes, exactly. Some of the ones I have watched have a sort of "train-of-thought" commentary. I find that watching those is super helpful for getting the mindset in gear before taking a timed PT.

If you have other suggestions, I would love to hear them. I am here to learn!

Thank you so much!!!

Turn suggestions off for BR

Oh - and thank you so much for your honesty and willingness to share! This is a wonderful post!

Not at all. I have noticed a trend: people who took a formal logic course as undergraduates have a major advantage on LR, particularly when it comes to conditional and causal reasoning. I began pursuing law without any guidance from my parents or my peers. Had I known that I could take courses that would improve my LSAT performance while earning my bachelor’s degree, I certainly would have taken advantage of that opportunity.

Not sure if that's the case for you, but either way, don't worry. It's an unrepresentative sample ;)

Don't do what I do sometimes, which is letting the test define me...

Anyway, good luck!

Best,

Joseph

@zunair "For all who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted." Luke 14:11.

Thank you for this post. Just fantastic. Good luck!

woah correct in 45 seconds? can't be...

youre not alone!!

@danjpeach96 Actors need cues to know when to speak. you need to know more than just your own lines to act in a play. a spectator could write down one soliloquy. i think its more of an assumption to say an actor did not have a copy.

@petvma an actor would have a copy. how else would they learn?

an actor would have a copy

@KikeHernándezLuvr Forget Pat. Pat can't even afford to be VideoKing Frequent Viewers Club member...

noooo wayyyyyy it actually made sense what is happening?!?