oh man i started to laugh and i know he was trying his best not to

i hate this question from the bottom of my heart.... if my lsat consists of questions like this i am screwed

i made a beginner mistake and ASSUMED pat was a member and chained the conditions.. therefore i chose C under the impression Pat can get the discount at both main st, and walnut location. ! sometimes the answers all come down to simple grammer! annoying !

HONESTLY... how the hell do we have enough time to figure this out during the LSAT lol

I must say with all due respect, your explanations are not well-explained.. hard to follow

this could have been done without reading passage B.

the past couple slides have confused me so much and now im losing grasp of evrything i learned so far! any advice????!

on the LSAT do we also have access to the search bar??? because that really helps in many situations of getting specific context throughout the passages.

whattt the helllyy

im not sure why the the trigger for the stimulus is not choosing B means he will choose A, rather than he chose A not B like it pretty much stated...

i have a question that needs some clarifications. in my opinion C just confirms what the argument is saying in that the program correctly diagnosed a higher proportion of heart attacks and that the cardiologists diagnosed higher-proportion of those that didnt have heart attacks which seems to be the the same thing in the other direction. wouldn't that then strengthen the fact that interpreting data should be left to the computer programs?

i need a better explanation as to why 4.D is wrong :(...

Honestly, under a timed condition, these questions not only take long, but also throw you off answering the following questions. This is a strategy I use, and it doesn't always work, but it does frequently.

passage:

Some, Surely no one. Must conclude some/ do not.

Answer choice:

Some. However no one. Therefore some/ do not

so far i have a perfect score on formal flaw questions but a zero on informal flaw questions... what am i doing wrong? why isnt informal makes sense to me the way formal is?!

i understand this specific example, however for future reference.. if there are 2 answers that both strengthen the argument, how can you decide which is the correct necessary assumption? any simplified way of analyzing this to have as a set rule?