If we question wether the police got the wrong person and both of S and F are innocent, are we directly questioning the validity of the premise, which is something we shouldn't do? Since they are already stipulated as suspects in the premise, we have to take it as fact, don't we? #help

Isn't (E) an equivocation of "design" and "check"?

#help (added by Admin)

Isn't the "deficiency of a compound in the brain " the symptom we are discussing?

This is time-consuming.

666

Just apply the negate test when things get tough

If you get these questions right out of pure intuition, I have to say I really envy you, because I can hardly understand most part of the explanation.

4 red 1 green. Totally eaten.

I eliminated A becuase it doesn't metion deliberate attempt

Turns out the most innocent-looking one is the correct one

What kind of word "Deleterious" is? You might as well throw a thesaurus in my face.

I just can't accept the fact that 75 out of 100 test takers should have chosen the right answer to such a masterly trapped question.

I still cannot make a decision between D and E. Surely both of them are not perfect for different reasons. But both of them are enough to be the answer to a weakening question.

#help I'm not quite cathcing up with the "company's overall position" part. What if the success of the new campaign will brings about such an incredible amount of benefits that the company are willing to sacrafice its current position for it? If so, will it exculde the "company's overall postion" from the company's consideration?

I conflated households with population under time pressure.

The reason I eliminate E is that even if Az has to sell his shares, we can't assume he is definateky selling it to Morris. Still confused about why E is the most supportive.

Had a struggle between B and D. Failed to make up my mind before the time ran out.

No other experiments have been done showing that magnetic fields reduce pain in any area other than the back.

/back→/reduce pain, therefore reduce pain→back. I think what answer says is that If magnets are to exert their pain-reducing magic, it's necessary for them to be applied to one's back. This leads me to the wrong answer choice.

The word "newsmaker" tripped me. Is it the publisher of the newspaper, or is it the protagonist of a coverage?

LSAT no longer writes "EXCEPT" in uppercase. You will only see "except" at your D-Day. Nothing serious, though.

Good baiting, LSAT writer

Interest & /love→/pro, therefore pro→ /interest or love. Am I doing the right contrapositive here? #help

#help Does the "and" in the first sentense indicate conjunction rather than disjunction? How can you tell whether an "and" serves as an "or"?

I've internalized the idea that one shouldn't challenge the source of information in LSAT stimulus, so...jokes on me

whenever you come across an RC consisting two passages in comparison, go straight to the questions after reading the first passage.