I've internalized the idea that one shouldn't challenge the source of information in LSAT stimulus, so...jokes on me

whenever you come across an RC consisting two passages in comparison, go straight to the questions after reading the first passage.

A doesn't mess up with the researcher's conclusion, though. Maybe the joggers from both groups are simply luckier than average joggers?

If we question wether the police got the wrong person and both of S and F are innocent, are we directly questioning the validity of the premise, which is something we shouldn't do? Since they are already stipulated as suspects in the premise, we have to take it as fact, don't we? #help

I agree with you on the alternative denotation of "average". I also know that in Flaw questions, several answer choices could undermine the argument, yet only one makes the argument "most vulnerable". The way I see it, we have to be charitable with a equivocation flaw like what (A) points out, when other major flaw is present. The conslusion is about the trend of a family's annual income. When the argument unlawfully preculdes one possible scenario where the trend has been downwards, it got to be the most fallacious assumpation from which the conclusion is drawn.

Isn't (E) an equivocation of "design" and "check"?

#help (added by Admin)

Isn't the "deficiency of a compound in the brain " the symptom we are discussing?

This is time-consuming.

I'd rather say "many" does not contradict with "most"

666

Just apply the negate test when things get tough

Pizzeria is the only restaurant that does A. Doing A helps Pizzeria to do B. But it doesn't suggest A is the only way that leads up to B. Perhaps some other restaurants also achieve B by other means. (D) is wrong for confusing B with A.

If you get these questions right out of pure intuition, I have to say I really envy you, because I can hardly understand most part of the explanation.

4 red 1 green. Totally eaten.

I eliminated A becuase it doesn't metion deliberate attempt

Turns out the most innocent-looking one is the correct one

That's cool

What kind of word "Deleterious" is? You might as well throw a thesaurus in my face.

You can really tell from the curves of questions that people are getting better at this test on a year-to-year basis.

I just can't accept the fact that 75 out of 100 test takers should have chosen the right answer to such a masterly trapped question.

I still cannot make a decision between D and E. Surely both of them are not perfect for different reasons. But both of them are enough to be the answer to a weakening question.

#help I'm not quite cathcing up with the "company's overall position" part. What if the success of the new campaign will brings about such an incredible amount of benefits that the company are willing to sacrafice its current position for it? If so, will it exculde the "company's overall postion" from the company's consideration?

I conflated households with population under time pressure.

The reason I eliminate E is that even if Az has to sell his shares, we can't assume he is definateky selling it to Morris. Still confused about why E is the most supportive.

Had a struggle between B and D. Failed to make up my mind before the time ran out.