@Kevin_Lin So far have only used it a little bit, but I like how detailed it is with the analysis on my drills!
people complain every chance they get, the lesson approach was a valid and helpful transition into weaken questions, nicely done. you need a positive mindset to do good
The AI coach is sick!
You guys (everyone asking) are welcome haha
📢 📢 ADMIN NOTE: Our AI Coach is currently in beta, and we've reached capacity for adding new users at this time. We'll continue rolling it out to more students over the coming weeks, so stay tuned for updates!
The explanation on this by AlbertGauthier is so bad, did nothing but restate, lazy.
I think there might be a mix up here regarding Option C. Controlling for age and weight actually increases the internal validity of the study by eliminating potential confounding variables, which strengthens a causal argument rather than weakening it.
The explanation seems to be confusing internal validity with generalization (external validity). While C doesn't weaken the argument, E is still the better answer because completely ruling out reverse causality is a much more powerful logical strengthener on the LSAT than just controlling a couple of background variables.