- Joined
- Nov 2025
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Discussions
Got it wrong knowing I didn't trust it, Got it right in BR only because I saw the correlation of the word Interest to Importance. D just felt like such strong wording.
@NixonAnderson
I do that after the fact. I do the same of reading the stim then reading through the answers. Afterwards I say why the other ones are wrong more fleshed out. Through the answering process I say like one word or pick out a word to why I think it's wrong
@GDatria715
It doesn't say that kids eating more children causes Harm, its more so like a warning. I t could therefore its an unacceptable practice (the pesticides)
A. Nothing mentioned compensation
B. ONLY? such strong wording especially since they didn't know it was harming their employees
C. Sure they have an obligation but again the employer didn't know of the harm
D. This didn't make sense at all
was starting to doubt myself but i went back on my answer and broke it apart in realizing on how it matches the stimulus. E was getting to me
Got it right in BR, tried to be quick first time
A) Doesn't mention intention
C) ANY act? So outside of acts that harm but didn't intend to it's still wrong? Maybe but that isn't what the stimulus says.
D) Avoids intention
E) Not at all what we're saying
These questions are tough for me but I feel like I'm getting it. I got it right both times.
B) It's giving it's all or nothing. Not really what the stimulus is saying. It's more because she got one then I should too, SHOULD.
D) It's not that they have the capability to apologize sincerely, it's the fact that they have been lied to and weren't given an apology unlike the other person.
A) Worse than D, sure it's good to but are they owed the apology with this answer?
E) It's not being able to apologize sincerely but that you are owed an apology on the premise of why the apology came up in the first place.
I think I'm understand in that the answer bit should match the stimulus bits.
this one was a little confusing to do before the video but I got it right.
A) he already has a PHD
B) Admission doesn't matter, more about revoking
C) he is not a student, he is an employee
E) He was already hired
I got it right in BR after a while but still didn't fully understand it. I get it after the fact but if someone could break it down like for a child that would be great.
2/5 , 3/5. Thought I got 5 wrong but it was right and changed it. 1 felt too easy that i skipped the right answer on purpose bc it didn't seem like an answer just stating the obvious.
lvl 4 but I felt like it was straightforward whatttt. I got it right too whattttt! The rest of the answer made the argument weak whereas B was sorta vague in the grey. They said there was a lot of symptoms.
A got me but I also didn't read through the rest. BR I got it right. D almost looked wrong because the margin of being correct felt so slight. It's quite an open-ended feeling, not quite zero chance.

Just 7 sec over times. Had me double checking and got it right in BR. lol