I have to go restudy the Indicator groups 🥲

5/5, without the blind review, I can't believeeeeeee it

I'm soooo confusedddd. Sometimes were supposed to infer what the writer is saying, sometimes inferring or assuming is a trap..I just don't know

I feel so behindddd, for the aug LSAT :(....but at least I'm catching on lol

@Summer my exact thoughts! I've joined a few classes that were really helpful, but I could tell that I was either missing ocncept, or just certain lingo that other students knew already

I'm confusing alignments with arguments as a summarization of the conclusion..if anyone else is doing this..you're technically doing more work than you need to..find the conclusion and chose the answer that best represents that, that's it!

2/5, then 4/5 on BR..I was able to catch certain mistakes before watching explanations though!

For the last question.. I automatically crossed out D because it seems like it supports the conclusion too well, for this to be a weakening question? Can someone explain

Im living in the blind review at this point of my studying path.. I alwayssss choose the wrong answer first and then I'm CONFIDENT that I know the right one, once I know that one is ruled out 😭

what are some wrong answer journal notes that you guys keep? I want to start one, just to reread right before or after I started studying everyday

reading through this helped wayyy more than the previous lessons on the same topics

@NikkiWidra This helped a lot! thank youuuu!

I'm here after taking my first diagnostic ever..I was caught by a lot of traps lol

my first 3/3, I should start moonwalking

I literally told myself "the two events could've been at the same place"

@bdubbink2 this helped so muchhhh

@SavanahHoffstein okay yes this does make senseee, thank youuuu

This was hard..I'm having trouble with all questions that I don't necessarily need "Lawgic" for, and the explanations make sense when I go over them but I can't see the logic myself :(

#2 I did the Lawgic right..but I didn't catch that negating the polls being grossly inaccurate just means its a good indication.. so I crossed out E quickly :/

what's helping me is saving a few of the skill builder questions to answer the next day.. to see what sticks and what needs to be reviewed again

Followed this perfectly, but i forgot the to double negate :/..so I was so confused when none of the answer choices matched my diagram lol

this was terribleeee, i was so ready to apply the skills about conditional logic and didn't use any of it

Hello! Thank you for hosting this.

My two questions would be; how often can you see topics of a personal statement actually revealing negative characteristics about an applicant? I have a good topic in mind, but am just thinking about vulnerability.

Secondly, I ask a lot of admissions advisors this, but how would you weigh an early GOOD application, with a mediocre score, and high GPA? I know schools can see if/when you register for a test and they usually just wait until you take the second test to give you a decision but I'd like advice on this as well.

Thanks again!

Star

So for #4, I started with /C->/Accept leadership..is there a quicker way that can tell me I should've used the contrapositive??

did anybody use cannot as a indicator??