User Avatar
aliamazhar915308
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
aliamazhar915308
Saturday, Mar 02 2024

I was just going through my notes and turns our "requires" is a group 2 indicator. That's probably why it was translated this way

0
User Avatar
aliamazhar915308
Saturday, Mar 02 2024

same... I was under the impression "change requires motive" makes motive the S.C. ( motive →change) #help

0
User Avatar
aliamazhar915308
Friday, Feb 16 2024

great lesson

7
User Avatar
aliamazhar915308
Thursday, Feb 15 2024

When we say 'the argument did not establish X', in LSAT language, what does establish mean? premise? example? #help

2
User Avatar
aliamazhar915308
Wednesday, Feb 14 2024

Given that the stimulus says "virtually certain", 'only' acting as overly inclusive is reasonable. Even if we maintain that it is overly inclusive, given that there might be a 1% chance of a third company getting the contract, the other answers choices are too flimsy and so through the POE and choosing the best answer, we would arrive at this answer choice.

Hope that helps!

2
User Avatar
aliamazhar915308
Monday, Feb 12 2024

Would it be correct to (generally) think of the term "evidence" as equating to premise in AP questions?

#help Added by Admin

1
User Avatar
aliamazhar915308
Monday, Feb 12 2024

I don't think there's an indicator per se, it's more of understanding the sentence. "Only" indicates that what follows is the N.C. However, when reading the whole sentence we can see that only those factors can lead to political structure, thereby indicating them to be S.C. That's how I figured it out at least. Hope that helped :)

1
User Avatar
aliamazhar915308
Monday, Feb 12 2024

Thank you!

0
User Avatar
aliamazhar915308
Monday, Feb 12 2024

can anyone link the bi-conditionals lesson #help #feedback

0
User Avatar
aliamazhar915308
Sunday, Feb 11 2024

Hi,

I thought E seemed super out of scope which is why I initially discarded it. The only advice I can give is that, in terms of sets, there is a set of teachers who are qualified and do not live "in this region". If we were to hire them, then this argument falls apart. So it is necessary that qualified teachers not in this region don't want to/will not come and teach "in this region" thereby maintaining the qualified teacher shortage (and allowing the rest of the argument to run through).

Hope this helps!

3
User Avatar
aliamazhar915308
Saturday, Feb 10 2024

Hi,

It depends on the context of the argument. There is nothing in the argument (i.e., prescription to preserve the rainforests, or prescription to preserve the rainforests for a particular reason) that would allow us to conclude that the author was advocating for the preservation of the rainforests. The author is merely presenting descriptive claims so it doesn't make sense for the answer choice to be prescriptive. Hope that helps a bit!

3
User Avatar
aliamazhar915308
Tuesday, Feb 06 2024

The AC just tells us another difference between coloured paper and paint (i.e., paint has varying texture and that impacts perception whereas for coloured paper that’s not the case). But how does this additional difference affect the argument? It doesn’t.

6
User Avatar
aliamazhar915308
Tuesday, Feb 06 2024

Hi,

The correct AC is not saying that both paint and coloured paper are useful rather it is saying that observing how colours appear in different compositions (i.e., lighting) is useful in learning to differentiate colours. Hope this helps a bit lol

0
User Avatar
aliamazhar915308
Thursday, Dec 14 2023

it is the case that in disjunctions you only need to trigger one of the SC to have the rule apply however, does this apply to all rules, i.e., you only need to trigger one premise to have the rule apply? #help

0
User Avatar
aliamazhar915308
Sunday, Dec 10 2023

Thanks!

0
User Avatar
aliamazhar915308
Wednesday, Dec 06 2023

Hi, I'm not sure I'm following. I don't want Q's after test 70 to be included in my drills. How do change the settings to reflect this? #help #feedback

0
User Avatar
aliamazhar915308
Wednesday, Nov 22 2023

anyone else exclude D because of the word "adopt"... passage didn't say anything about adopting lol

6
User Avatar
aliamazhar915308
Monday, Nov 20 2023

same Q given that some is at least one and the explanation says "more than one or two"

1
User Avatar
aliamazhar915308
Friday, Nov 17 2023

Can JY or a tutor confirm this reasoning?

#help (Added by Admin)

2
User Avatar
aliamazhar915308
Wednesday, Nov 15 2023

I agree. I was initially studying on V1 of the curriculum, and I feel like the videos of JY showing you how to do this are more helpful than just text. #feedback

2
User Avatar
aliamazhar915308
Wednesday, Nov 15 2023

why didn't they chain /S ->T with the rest of the argument? I know it would be a branch off and wouldn't produce an extra answer but shouldn't we be chaining as much as possible? #help

0
PrepTests ·
PT103.S1.Q9
User Avatar
aliamazhar915308
Thursday, Sep 28 2023

same, because for some reason I equated comets with planets smh

4
PrepTests ·
PT101.S2.Q2
User Avatar
aliamazhar915308
Wednesday, Sep 20 2023

I arrived at D through process of elimination but was hesitant because aren't the parents/caregivers making the purchase and thus the infants aren't technically driving sales. IDK, am I making too many assumptions?

#help (Added by Admin)

0
PrepTests ·
PT112.S3.Q3
User Avatar
aliamazhar915308
Tuesday, Sep 19 2023

I got it right, but can someone explain why it's not A? Why does "only" imply that SMAT precedes the formation of champions?

#help (Added by Admin)

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?