User Avatar
chrisobrien17852
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
chrisobrien17852
Friday, Aug 30 2024

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

User Avatar
chrisobrien17852
Monday, Sep 30 2024

Science RC Passages are like Xandlebars, got my eyes heavy with no backwoods

User Avatar
chrisobrien17852
Thursday, Aug 29 2024

Have been managing test anxiety well but now after getting bad sunburns every summer and having skin cancer in my family I'm shifting bricks if you catch my drift

User Avatar
chrisobrien17852
Monday, Oct 28 2024

Just went to a law school fair this past weekend and spoke with ~10 admissions officers from different schools ranging from mid-size mid-rank to larger and higher ranked. I would say I've also had unique circumstances surrounding my education journey, though none so as varied and drastic as yours it sounds like.

I asked them all specifically they would look for most in someone who is a few years out of an academic career that they maybe felt on paper doesn't look as strong as they think it should. All, every single one, of the admissions officers said more or less the same thing.

Your personal statement, and less so your professional resume and letters of recommendation, are the MOST IMPORTANT THING to address these concerns by displaying your strengths in ways that cannot be measured quantitatively in tests and degrees. HOW you write, WHAT you write about, and WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY about yourself on your own essay are the biggest advocates you can establish for yourself.

So to answer your question: yes, absolutely. In fact, in your case, it may matter more than it would for most other people. But, by the same way, this can be your biggest strength in the application process. So, take time to figure out the "how" and "what", ask yourself those sorts of questions and find ways to show it on paper.

PrepTests ·
PT145.S2.Q7
User Avatar
chrisobrien17852
Sunday, Oct 27 2024

this is so stupid

User Avatar
chrisobrien17852
Wednesday, Nov 27 2024

Depends a bit on how long you've been studying and if you're having problems with any particular set of questions. I was doing PT's every 2-3 days and stuck at virtually the same score, took a week off with light studying, and then came back and PT'd twice more and got the same score. It was really frustrating. I would recommend stepping away entirely and taking up hobbies and practices that can help your test taking abilities in other ways.

Practice reading unfamiliar text, like books you wouldn't normally read or news from a different source or foreign country.

Practice a mindfulness routine, like meditating or yoga, running etc. Even something like cooking a medium-difficulty meal each night.

I felt my problem was I would just keep drilling to try and bolster my understanding of the concepts of the test, where I think my problem was more keeping my mind clear and being able to digest each question better, rather than harkening back to the tricks and mindset I would have when drilling

User Avatar
chrisobrien17852
Monday, Aug 26 2024

I pause the lesson then try to answer the question and when I get it right I could run through a wall like the Kool Aid man

User Avatar
chrisobrien17852
Monday, Aug 26 2024

Put me in coach

User Avatar

Thursday, Oct 24 2024

chrisobrien17852

Spiraling - My PT score has never changed

I started studying by taking a diagnostic and scored a 160. After a week or so of fundamentals, I took a PT on an off day and got a 152 which bothered me a lot, but I decided I wouldn't PT until completing the courses and understanding the concepts. The day after completing the courses (about 1.5 months later), I scored a 161 or 162. Since then, I have done 4 more prep tests, all 4-7 days of studying apart, and have gotten a 160 every single time. The past 2 times I have taken a PrepTest, I have felt really good about each section. I usually always have 5-10 minutes left over every section where I go back and review the questions I have flagged, and regularly get to review every question I'd flagged.

I'm taking the November LSAT in just two weeks and I'm a bit disheartened that I have been working for 2 months and making virtually no progress. I'm desperate for any advice or ways to renew my approach.

User Avatar
chrisobrien17852
Friday, Aug 23 2024

I have only taken a handful of practice tests but cannot remember there ever being questions that scrutinize quantifiers in this way. Is there a bigger picture application to these lawgic/grammar equations?

User Avatar
chrisobrien17852
Wednesday, Oct 23 2024

Haven't taken the test yet so I'm not sure how detailed the returned scores are - but I am assuming based on your comment it is just the total and raw score without any detailed analytics.

I would say this: The only way to keep a "bad score" to continue to have a negative impact is to let it. What I mean by this is, there is ample opportunity to crush November and establish a score you feel will better represent you to schools. Even more so if they can see such marked improvement in a short amount of time. If you spiral out about getting a bad score and keep that mindset going into November, you've already done more damage than whatever score you got could have done.

Put the "bad" score in your back pocket, spend the next couple weeks drilling the items you had the most trouble with.

User Avatar
chrisobrien17852
Sunday, Sep 22 2024

I am not convinced that B is not the correct answer. I have not watched the video. And I won't.

User Avatar
chrisobrien17852
Thursday, Oct 17 2024

Hello! I would recommend just watching and taking notes through the foundations, go at your own pace to make sure you're really absorbing the information. As you get into specific problem types and question type units, there will be a blend of "you try" questions, where you are prompted to try the question first and then it will be discussed in a video after, or just example questions dissected by the instructor.

On all questions in videos, there is a "quick view" button (its a bit small and easy to miss), I would recommend clicking it and trying the questions before the video, untimed, in most cases, while the "you try" drills are timed. This way, you're staying interactive and you can compare your approach to the approaches detailed in the video.

Practicing problems "right away", as your friends are FOMOing you with, is useless if you are not able to learn from the approach as well as the result. You will have PLENTY of time to do as many practice questions as your little heart desires if you are taking the test in Feb. Establishing fundamental understanding and absorbing information at your own pace is more important than mindlessly drilling for the sake of it.

User Avatar
chrisobrien17852
Friday, Sep 13 2024

AC "D" is the only AC with probability language matching the conclusion I am a god so hurry up with my damn croissant

User Avatar
chrisobrien17852
Friday, Sep 13 2024

Should I just accept that I will be skipping these every time they come up (hopefully once per section) and then planning on using my leftover time on them? Nothing else in LR comes even close to taking me as long

User Avatar
chrisobrien17852
Friday, Sep 13 2024

Do AC's of the "inadequate argument" persuasion always fall short of being correct for Flaw questions? i.e. can they always be eliminated for POE?

User Avatar
chrisobrien17852
Wednesday, Sep 11 2024

We are so back

User Avatar
chrisobrien17852
Tuesday, Sep 10 2024

AC E is a glasses wearing dork in desperate need of a swirlie i am so mad

User Avatar
chrisobrien17852
Tuesday, Sep 10 2024

The first level 5 question ive gotten in like 2 weeks I could bend steel rn

User Avatar
chrisobrien17852
Tuesday, Sep 10 2024

im on that good kush an alcohol

User Avatar
chrisobrien17852
Tuesday, Sep 10 2024

I frequently have trouble catching myself going down "backwards bridges", as I'm not great at lawgic so I confuse it with following a contrapositive.

What helped me was think of it as "building waterslides" instead of "building bridges". The latter is the more common phrase but I think the former is a more applicable analogy to how the relationships function. A valid premise waterslide will deliver you to the conclusion. You cannot go back up the waterslide as it is.

User Avatar
chrisobrien17852
Monday, Sep 09 2024

Got it right in 32 seconds because this reasoning is how I arrived at applying to law school lmao

User Avatar
chrisobrien17852
Monday, Sep 09 2024

What do your social circumstances have to be for this to be a difficulty 3 question

User Avatar
chrisobrien17852
Monday, Nov 04 2024

If you can identify consistent LR question types you are missing, I would focus on those. RC passages are IMO very difficulty/topic dependent, so if you already have a strong enough strategy for RC I would try and foolproof your LR. I'm in the same boat

User Avatar
chrisobrien17852
Saturday, Nov 02 2024

Keep the 166 and pour yourself a tall drink - congrats!

Confirm action

Are you sure?