LOL .... just take the L and move on. "oBtAiN"

but I do get why A is right so that's good

I imagined Satcmo 's voice as well. that helped me understand the passage lol

Switched to C last second and I could've got it right!! ;(

I think keyword "requirement" in E shouldve gave it away. I sadly picked C.

clearly missed this one.

getting bridgerton vibes from this passage

why am I good at these now but suck at them on practice tests

what's crazy is that I didn't even consider E. I eliminated it. I went with D and considered A. fml

o.O wuuut ?

#feedback got to say, the explanation for B being wrong was sad. someone explain it better please

I just viewed sincerity in this context as facing unpleasant realities and speaking honestly. so I got to B->C quickly

contrapose on the rule or Apply De Morgan’s to find answer

how are we suppose to get this right in under 2 mins? crazzzzzy

don't think i would have gotten this right unless i guessed correctly. "boilerplate determinism" what a joke

Why am i good at these? did i get better at the lsat and not even realize it? i hope so!

pretty decent at these but gosh i take forever

C is nasty. literally is redundant

bro took way too much time explaining why A is wrong. Also not fully convinced on B. What if the constituents did not think the current tax was too high? would they oppose an even lower tax or wouldn't they still be in favor?

LOL how did i pick E! i've been doing just fine up until this question..... my point is.... we are bound to get some wrong, even silly ones like this.

I got it right but really did not understand D.

someone explain why C is wrong.

#help it took me 9 mins! I got it right but what am I not understanding right away? what foundational lessons do I need to go back to? please help!!

So essentially, even if people overestimated, that doesn't prove the hypothesis.

skip save for after reading passage B

Got this right because I understood the kind of argument, not so much because I knew what the author was saying. In fact I still don't understand the analogy used.