Ever since we switched to the assumption framework, this has been the most frustrating module.

I've only gotten one of these questions correct. Feeling stuck.

Thank you for replying back Kevin, and yes I was referring to the last line of the stimulus.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but what I'm gathering is that when there is no referential phrasing in a sentence, then I should treat each sentence as an independent statement within a stimulus when conditional reasoning is present. #help

I understand this reasoning and why the correct answer was E, in addition I mapped out everything correctly, however how do I know the last sentence in the stimulus is referring to all of the countries that are a part of the UN Security Council rather than the 5 countries of the UN Security Council that was mentioned in the prior sentence?

I chose C because I thought the last sentence was referring to the 5 countries mentioned in the stimulus and there wasn't anything mentioned about all of the countries of the UN Security Council.

How do I connect those dots? What am I missing? #help

Thank you so much for this explanation. Also, thank you to the person who asked the question.

Well I'll be damned. I said to myself after I made my selection: this is surprisingly too easy...

"It is given" and "to be" introduce context; noted.

And yes, I chose answer choice A.

With no. 1, it's if fuzzy seeds, then long stems and not white flowers. The 'but' can be translated to 'and' and it will look like this:

fs→ ls and /wf

As the other reply above mentioned, just because you have a long stem, doesn't imply that you have fuzzy seeds. You can have a long stem and have other characteristics.

Thank you for this explanation! Before, I could not grasp why D was wrong.

I missed this question because I forgot to link WK to HS after I linked everything else together. SMH.

I must slow down and double check my conditional chains.

I selected the correct answer timed, but talked myself out of it during BR.

MSS will be the death of me.

I got it correct on BR, just need to get it correct timed.

I need a drink after this one.

It took me three times to answer this question correctly. I understood that the first sentence was context, however it took me awhile to realize that "For since" was a premise indicator and the preceding language in the third sentence was supporting the second sentence.

The worst set of questions ever.

This was a tough passage to follow. I was able to understand the passage better when I got to the questions, which required me to revert to the passage.

Only made it to Q2 during timed and was 1/6, while I was 5/6 during BR.

I guess I need to review main conclusion questions.

I just knew the last sentence was the MC.

Me too!

AC D was my first choice, but I second guessed myself and chose AC A. SMH.

Q 26 was very tough to comprehend, but after JY's explanation, I completely understood what the question was asking. I hate that I wasn't able to comprehend it because the answer choice becomes so obvious afterwards.

Question 5!!! Destroyed my mood.

Me too. My first mind said D, but I went back to A.

I narrowed it down to AC B and D. I initially chose D, but I started trying to make sense of B and went with it.

Next time I'll stick with my first choice.

Just finished the exam, and it wasn't as nerve wrecking as I thought it would be.

I was thrown off that there were two RC sections, which wasn't bad, but I was mentally prepared for two LR sections.

The section of RC was tougher for me than the first sections (definetely required more focus).

The LR section wasn't too bad, but I could've done better.

Overrall, for my first test it went well and I know what to expect on the next one.

Congratulations and thank you for sharing your LSAT journey. I take my first test on Friday, and I know that this is just the begining of my LSAT journey.

Your story is inspiring in that it reaffirms this test is hard, but it can be beaten with constant persistence and hardwork.

Congrats again!!

@rdhallan331, would you mind sharing that checklist with me please? That would be very useful!!