I got this right and was able to POE pretty quickly but man this argument some buns
SUITS MENTIONED RAHHHHHHHHHH!!!!
Oh my god I love this section can LR just be this
#feedback I found this really helpful and I think other students did as well. Would love to see more of this.
Haven't done the module for NA questions yet but I read about it in the LSAT Trainer, if I had to guess I wouldn't try to predict the right answer for this type of question as sometimes arguments can have multiple things be necessary. I would lean towards POE
Hey so I'm planning on taking my first preptest since my diagnostic, and I was wondering if I would be able to import the diagnostic results I took on LawHub into 7sage for the analytics?
I tried looking at reddit and google and couldn't find anything
lmaoo the hypothetical principle for B was awesome
now that's a bruhmoment
if I had to guess no but I'm not 100% on that, but I might start using physical paper instead just to simulate exam conditions as much as possible
Sometimes it glitches, usually refreshing brings that menu back up for me.
Didn't read the except part of the stem and I was so confused lol
Yeah this one was also tricky for me because A just seemed too easy, but I need to remember that I'm in necessary assumption land and sometimes the "easy/redundant" answers are the correct ones
Hey for everyone else who selected A instead of C, here is my explanation I made in my notes prior to watching the video that helped me realize my mistake:
Got this question incorrect by selecting A.
This was interesting as I had C down and then switched my answer to A. Should have gone with the first answer.
Some mistakes I notice is that A talks about "may depend" while C says HIGHLY suspectible.
C has a higher occurence of inaccuracy, and guarantees the conclusion more.
Remember in sufficient assumption questions my task is to gaurantee the conclusion. As Mike Kim said there is an obvious flaw as if there weren't then there's no way one sentence could make the conclusion valid.
Next time select the answer that has more precise grammar to guarantee the conclusion
Here is my explanation that I wrote in my notes after I did a drill and got this wrong, hope this helps someone!
Got this question incorrect by selecting (A)
I see my mistake, I didn't match the rule correctly. Just because people do not shop around doesn't mean there aren't a number of large independent prospective sellers and people can compare the price. This doesn't fail the necessary condition.
I think I got this wrong because I brought in outside knowledge to this question and didn't anchor myself to the stimulus
What does fail the necessary condition is (B). If they can't determine the worth of the repairs then there is NO way that the auto repair industry is a functioning free market.
Yeah I thought the something and that's why I thought C was right. Just read it too quickly and I realized my mistake
Hey just leaving a tip that works for me just in case it would help someone else:
I take all my notes digitally, and to still map out the questions without taking paper out, I use Microsoft Paint and do some squiggles in Lawgic and found it helpful
I like many other people in the comment section got tricked by B, and took J.Y.'s advice of making a modern day example of the difference in standard of proof.
Here is my example from my notes for anyone who is into bodybuilding/lifting and wants a chuckle:
Modern day example of the various standard of proof that J.Y. told me to create:
Ex. Lifting straps are beneficial for back exercises
Check, most of the gym public agrees with this.
But not check: There are still some skeptics that believe their grip is strong enough to support their back movements/deadlifts.
A much higher standard of proof.
I have heard people do both but I typically read the question stem first and that is what has been recommended by 7sage and the LSAT Trainer
How I understood it was that E is saying that critics claims (other than the one listed in the stimulus) are used with fuzzy distinctions, and E was making a conclusion about all the claims that the critics had, while A zeros in on the critics' claim specifically in the stimulus. Not too sure if that helps anyone but wanted to throw it out there just in case
No worries happens to the best of us. A tip that I have learned from the LSAT trainer is that the author of that book suggested to read through all answer choices and try to eliminate incorrect ones before looking for the correct answer. If you think an answer choice could be correct, keep it and then continue down the list. I find that it works for me but everyone is different
it will be 10 years next May, I hope we can win it soon again