I like many other people in the comment section got tricked by B, and took J.Y.'s advice of making a modern day example of the difference in standard of proof.
Here is my example from my notes for anyone who is into bodybuilding/lifting and wants a chuckle:
Modern day example of the various standard of proof that J.Y. told me to create:
Ex. Lifting straps are beneficial for back exercises
Check, most of the gym public agrees with this.
But not check: There are still some skeptics that believe their grip is strong enough to support their back movements/deadlifts.
A much higher standard of proof.
I plan to take the LSAT then but I may cancel it and take it later if my practice tests aren't where I want them to be
Hey so I'm planning on taking my first preptest since my diagnostic, and I was wondering if I would be able to import the diagnostic results I took on LawHub into 7sage for the analytics?
I tried looking at reddit and google and couldn't find anything
lmaoo the hypothetical principle for B was awesome
#feedback This lesson was great, thank you J.Y. Happy to have videos once again after dragging through the end of the core curriculum lmao
Good luck to anyone seeing this comment!!!
#feedback I was really confused at first but the video really helped for this skill builder, thank you!
Didn't read the except part of the stem and I was so confused lol
I got this right and was able to POE pretty quickly but man this argument some buns
SUITS MENTIONED RAHHHHHHHHHH!!!!
Oh my god I love this section can LR just be this
Hey for everyone else who selected A instead of C, here is my explanation I made in my notes prior to watching the video that helped me realize my mistake:
Got this question incorrect by selecting A.
This was interesting as I had C down and then switched my answer to A. Should have gone with the first answer.
Some mistakes I notice is that A talks about "may depend" while C says HIGHLY suspectible.
C has a higher occurence of inaccuracy, and guarantees the conclusion more.
Remember in sufficient assumption questions my task is to gaurantee the conclusion. As Mike Kim said there is an obvious flaw as if there weren't then there's no way one sentence could make the conclusion valid.
Next time select the answer that has more precise grammar to guarantee the conclusion
Here is my explanation that I wrote in my notes after I did a drill and got this wrong, hope this helps someone!
Got this question incorrect by selecting (A)
I see my mistake, I didn't match the rule correctly. Just because people do not shop around doesn't mean there aren't a number of large independent prospective sellers and people can compare the price. This doesn't fail the necessary condition.
I think I got this wrong because I brought in outside knowledge to this question and didn't anchor myself to the stimulus
What does fail the necessary condition is (B). If they can't determine the worth of the repairs then there is NO way that the auto repair industry is a functioning free market.
#feedback I found this really helpful and I think other students did as well. Would love to see more of this.
Hey just leaving a tip that works for me just in case it would help someone else:
I take all my notes digitally, and to still map out the questions without taking paper out, I use Microsoft Paint and do some squiggles in Lawgic and found it helpful