JY gave a good explanation of why E is wrong. I still have questions about it. For E, its attacking the conclusion, which we are not supposed to attack in weakening questions. Im still puzzled as to why D attacks the support. Can someone explain it better?

so is this part of the lesson using the justify the conclusion method. this method states (from a different LSAT study book) that you should link new elements in the premises with new elements in the conclusion. Are we doing the same thing here?

is it better to pick the more concise answer choice in comparisant to D and C. D is very concise in telling us that cheese and baked goods contain higher fat whereas C is very general in explaining the dietary difference. Essentially, is it better to choose answer choices that are concise and to avoid answer choices that are generalized?

is it better to go into these questions without any assumptions to avoid making the wrong assumption?

#feedback

if we were to change this to a strengthening question, would b still be correct because it is a some statement which makes it general and easy to defend. also neither weakens or adds strength to the argument?

just got done with the first section and wow. out of fifteen questions, I got twelve correct. I have needed this method for so long, because i have struggled in the past. 7sage has got this method down and i think it is unbreakable.

suspected criminal does not fall into the subset of being a criminal. in other words, this was an awful comparison because rabbits and gray rabbits are definitive. suspected criminlas are not definitive, because they still need to be tried and convicted. for example, all gray rabbits are rabbits, that cloud looks like a rabbit and is gray, so it must be a rabbit. just awful logic all around. however, this is important to take into account when comparing different sets, the sets and subsets have to be similar. a better way for the author to make a better comparison wouldve been with gang members and gang tattoos. if a person has a blood tattoo, then he is a gang member. it falls in the set of gang members, but a subset of different gangs.