@nknapp120301 thank you

@LowriThomas this helped a lot thanks

@Willyc gotcha thanks

you know how they say to read the question before reading the stim. i read the discussion here before reading the actual material

i wish there was a video of a lsat taker at different levels (i.e 150s, 160s, 170s) going through there timed section speaking about their thought process during the timed portion then going through the BR section. as if we are just sitting behind them watching what they are doing and how they correctly review

@Willyc so even though the drill is untimed you found it helpful to still blind review the questions you got wrong? i was told to not BR untimed sections because you are already given all the time you could need

@Rena12345 so the summer heat is a 3rd factor as to why both of those phenomena are occurring?

so since the question stem does not talok about the preventative measures then we can conclude that we don't know if rotation is occurring or not occurring in the question stem's situation?

@SundayMonday thank you

@NoaF123 i would of just pictured the diagram to show that more than 50% of B is being consumed by C just to show that B-M->C

if there are 2 NYC violinists and 500 people who can play the violin. and 400 violinists could not be exceptionally good and those 2 nyc violinists are not necessarily apart of that 400 that are not good at the violin. so A cannot sometimes be C. lol idk

what happened to the video explanations lol

@elizaklingler301 thanks bb

@304694 bro put that Duh and made me feel real bad lmao. goodlooks

@marikitten03 ? you just restated the second premise so ofcourse it is valid. but its not a new conclusion. just remember most BEFORE all

@hjcraig u good bro fr

@PranjalChaudhary yup now i know thats a most inidicator

i was thinking while doing this question that a loophole in this argument could be that fat % does not necessarily indicate having a healthier diet. the body needs fat. what if the people with a lower fat % diet were having 0 fats or only 1% fats in there diet. isn't that necessarily more unhealthy thus you cannot draw this conclusion? honestly idk i picked E ngl what do i know lol

@jddaph there is a little symbol in the top left next to where you can open up this discussion. it almosts looks like a lil ribbon. click that

"guarantee" could also be "may guarantee" in a stim then it is not really guaranteeing anything

@BrieV you good bro keep going ull figure it out took me till like week 2 to really understand it better fr

so basically, the government did not answer the question and A is just a reiteration of what the attorney is alleging and saying that it has not been answered sufficiently to prove if the government destroyed evidence? because saying that there is not evidence does not answer the claim that the government destroyed evidence. one can imply that since there is not evidence that the government must have already destroyed the evidence but that is an assumption at that point. idk if im on the right track here or not. goodnight.

how can we assume that the word should is being used as the word are here? what clues/evidence support this im struggling to see that

what i struggled with is understanding what Larew means when they say "...increased relative to the highest quintile?" what u mean by relative lmao

yes i am in nj, let me know