All posts
New post553 posts in the last 30 days
I've started a new video series where I dive into student PrepTest results and offer some high-level strategic advice. I did the first one with Kevin and had a lot of fun with it.
I'd love to do more of these, so please share your PT results!
Is there a way to get access to the summaries that are posted at the end of various lessons? I would love to print them out instead of navigating them on Miro website... I really do not like that format.
I'm looking for an outline for my foundations notes. Does 7sage offer pdfs to print for a note outline? Has anyone made an outline and would be willing to share it with me? My notes feel unorganized and I don't have the time to fully rewrite them but would love a more organzied notebook to follow and keep on hand!
My drill screen has just shrunk 50% smaller and it's difficult to read. Can we fix this back to full screen? Thanks
Hi I'm looking for study buddies. Im planning on taking the exam in June 2026. Would love to study with people and learn off of each other :)
I have been doing 2 sections a day (1 LR 1 RC) in preparation for the Jan LSAT. Just this morning when I went to do my sections the whole layout had changed. The questions and stimulus is in a small box in the middle of my screen leaving much open space. Also all the text is super condensed. It threw me off ngl. Is this how the LSAT will frfr look on test day. I plan to take it in a testing center.
Philosopher: You’re an idiot. Even if we care about nature, banning fossil fuels would lead to massive deforestation as manufacturers turn to biofuels as a substitute. So we shouldn’t listen to your smooth-brained policy proposal.
Environmentalist: Ad hominem! Ad hominem! And you call yourself a philosopher.
Philosopher: No. I didn’t commit the ad hominem fallacy.
Environmentalist: But you insulted me and said I was wrong.
Philosopher: No, no, my illogical friend. There’s nuance to this. We commit the ad hominem fallacy when we attack the source of a claim as support for why that claim is wrong.
For example -
You smell like a cesspit. So, we shouldn’t listen to you when you tell us to use eco-friendly soap.
Here, I’m citing to your stench as a reason to reject your recommendation. But the idea that we should use eco-friendly soap should be evaluated on its own merit. What are the pros and cons of eco-friendly soap? That’s what we should consider, not your distasteful body odor. That’s why this argument commits an ad hominem fallacy.
However, consider my original statements.
You’re an idiot. Even if we care about nature, banning fossil fuels would lead to massive deforestation as manufacturers turn to biofuels as a substitute. So we shouldn’t listen to your smooth-brained policy proposal.
Notice that even though I am calling you an idiot, and even though I label your proposal as smooth-brained, I’m not saying that we shouldn’t listen to you because you’re a smooth-brained idiot. I rely instead on the effects of banning fossil fuels to support my conclusion. My comments on your lack of intelligence are simply fun add-ons that don’t play a logical role in my argument. So I’m not committing the ad hominem fallacy.
Environmentalist: Interesting. I think I get it.
Philosopher: Let me give you another example.
Environmentalist: Thanks, but I’m pretty sure I und–
Philosopher: You’re a stinky, mouth-breathing dunce. Ad hominem?
Environmentalist: …Yes?
Philosopher: Ha! Trick question – it wasn’t even an argument. So calling the claim logically flawed wouldn’t even make sense.
Environmentalist: I see. Well, I have to get–
Philosopher: If I had said, for example, that we shouldn’t listen to you because you’re a stinky, mouth-breathing loser and nobody likes you, then that would have been an ad hominem fallacy.
Environmentalist: Thanks, I got it.
Philosopher: You’re welcome, you foul-smelling fool. Not ad hominem!
Feeling like I've got a long road ahead to score 175 in January. Any tips? Feeling like parallel reasoning is dragging eme down most. Formal logic is occasionally a trip up, but not often.
Hello,
I am reaching out because my Lawhub account is about to expire. I spoke with LSAC and they said that any prompt I am receiving about LawHub on a third-party vendor site should be addressed with the third-party vendor.
I am receiving a LAWHUB ERROR! message next to my profile icon on 7sage and I want to be sure that when this expires, this will not impact my current profile with 7sage. LSAC has informed me that upon expiration I will have to generate a new LawHub account and I cannot renew before the expiration.
Am I about to lose all of my progress with 7sage that I have tracked? What are next steps? As this expires next week for me.
I know correlation does not imply causation, but out of curiosity, does cause imply correlation? and is this something that would ever be encountered on the lsat?
Hello everyone!
I wanted to share my experience with the admissions and writing consulting services at 7Sage. Working with both Daniel Ryu (writer) and Jennifer Kott (Admissions Officer) was a great experience. They were not only knowledgeable and supportive throughout the process, but were also very responsive to all my questions and emails.
While working on the written portions of my application, Daniel was always willing to meet with me through video meetings about once a week and provided great feedback on my work, which allowed me to improve it. Jennifer was equally helpful, answering my questions about the admissions process both during our video session and through email. She helped shed light on some concerns and questions I had about law school and the admissions process, and I greatly appreciated her dedication to help, answer my questions, and reply to emails in a timely manner.
If I had to go through the admissions process all over again, I would absolutely choose 7Sage, their writers, and admissions experts to help me with the application process. Their support was excellent, and I couldn’t recommend them more.
Hello, I just began my studying, and im studying to take the lsat next year. I would love to have a study group or study buddies, where we hold each other accountable and give each other insights.
So a month ago I broke 170 on a PT for the first time, 174 on 140. The following week a 173 on PT 150. I was like damn I finally broke the 160s plateau. Lo and behold I got a 168 on PT153, which isn't horrific, given its only around 3ish questions worse compared to my 173 performance, if not for the fact that I got -8 on one of the RC sections, which thankfully was experimental. I'd like to be more realistic about things and just realise that this is all just part of performance variance, but honestly the way reading comprehension drills have been bending me over is just making me question whether those were fluke performances. idk im trying everything ive been told, 4 minutes on the passage, the split approach, highlighting key words, i just find a way to fumble questions. Im redoing old passages from before to avoid running out of passages and still getting stuff wrong. What am i missing? And are drills supposed to be this tough? Also i'm considering getting a tutor because i'm at a bit of a loss, does anyone else have experience with this?
When reviewing questions outside of blind review, I can't see my actual take (the answers I eliminated and which ones I kept open). All I see is the unmarked question.
For those who are working full-time and trying to study for the LSATs, how are you managing it? How are you scheduling yourself. I have tried to study for the LSAT for about three years and have never been discipline enough to manage both. I would study at work but never at home or during the weekends.
Granted I have not done enough practice exams to see where I am at. I just want something more than what I currently have in live and would love to be a lawyer. But finding sometimes finding the motivation is hard for me. I am trying to find ways to improve my mental health so I can manage both
Any tips would be appreciated
I am taking my LSAT in January. However, I just got notified that my LSAC Fee Waiver to Law Hub expires in seven days and that there is NO way to renew it until November 27th, 2026 (a year from now). I have completed the core curriculum on 7sage and am in my first week of drilling. This means that I will be left without access to any prep tests or drill questions starting next week as I lose access to 7Sage materials due to losing my fee-waiver-provided subscription to Law Hub.
I can not afford to purchase a standalone Law Hub subscription (hence why I am on the Fee Waiver). What should I do? I already applied to law schools as the deadline was Nov 1st (the January LSAT is the last accepted LSAT score for this admission cycle in Ontario, Canada) and so this upcoming LSAT score would be the final/only score on my application....
Hi, I live in North Jersey but also go to NYC a lot so if any girls are interested in a study group in this area let me know. I'm also open to online study sessions to hold each other accountable.
I recently started actually studying and plan on taking the lsat on April.
I was consistently PT-ing in the 170+s for several weeks leading up to my October LSAT, but my official score didn’t even break into the 160s :( Has anyone else experienced something similar? I’m starting to question my abilities / intelligence despite all the effort I put in.
Hi all,
I've been struggling with staying focused even for small drills for extended periods of time (30min lol) periods of time and it is genuinely so frustrating. Anyone else have trouble with focus? I get distracted so easily it makes me doubt myself and future career prospects :(







