seems like a bunch of stuff that doesnt apply to 80 percent of the problems. when does it start getting useful. i feel like im wasting alot of hours on it

Am i wrong in saying that logical reasoning, at large, is just reading comprehension in a slightly different format? Instead of synthesizing a text you are understanding/comprehending individual arguments.

For those who are working full-time and trying to study for the LSATs, how are you managing it? How are you scheduling yourself. I have tried to study for the LSAT for about three years and have never been discipline enough to manage both. I would study at work but never at home or during the weekends.

Granted I have not done enough practice exams to see where I am at. I just want something more than what I currently have in live and would love to be a lawyer. But finding sometimes finding the motivation is hard for me. I am trying to find ways to improve my mental health so I can manage both

Any tips would be appreciated

Hello! Just was wondering if the new released disclosed PT (I think it's the April 2025/Feb 2014 exam) will be uploaded to 7Sage sometime soon? I would like to take this before the January exam, but I would prefer to take it on the computer! Thank you!

Hi everyone! I'm currently on week 3 of my core curriculum study plan and have had a hard time keeping up with the pace of the study plan even though I have it set at the minimum amount of hours a day. In my study plan it says to do PTS regularly once I've finished the core curriculum but wanted to know if anyone else recommends or found it helpful to do PTs sprinkled throughout while doing the core curriculum as well. Or should I just focus on and power through core curriculum and save the PT practice until the end?

Hi guys. I used 7sage for five months (no other learning programs). I started with a 164 baseline score and I am so so so excited to be able to share that I got a 180. I cried when I saw. I never expected this. Thank you so much 7sage could not have done it without you guys. Hope everyone else's October tests went well. It has been a stressful ride for me. Not gonna lie this is just a celebration post for me since no one in my life understands the significance of this! I will answer questions if anyone wants to know anything about my study process.

I just scored a 163 on PT139.

Just for some background, I decided to study for the LSAT about a month ago and I have just one chance to take it in January if I want to begin in the fall. I work full time and study when I can, but my job can be very demanding at times. I've taken a practice test every weekend for the past 4 weeks and have scored 164 3 times in a row, and a 163 just yesterday. My blind review is consistently high and I found it's because most of the questions I get wrong are the ones where I'm left between two options.

How can I improve to at least 170 before January 5th? The recorded lessons are great and all, but I've been having some difficulty learning the "lawgic" so I've just been doing all the questions in my head. Is there a better way to study? I feel like the tutoring sessions helped just a bit, but I'm not seeing any improvement.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated!

So I like and dislike the new format. I like how it is a way of practicing like on test day but I don't like how when you cross out an answer it doesn't fade away like on LawHub or before the new update. Can this be brought back.

And can the old format still be used for reviewing. It offered more space to read and review.

I'm looking for an outline for my foundations notes. Does 7sage offer pdfs to print for a note outline? Has anyone made an outline and would be willing to share it with me? My notes feel unorganized and I don't have the time to fully rewrite them but would love a more organzied notebook to follow and keep on hand!

I just scored a 162 on PT154.

To those who have mastered conditional lawgic,

I am wondering what study methods you used to master this. Drilling questions is one thing, but what other methods did you use? Is there a quizlet out there that has all the indicators, translation rules, etc. that I can use? please let me know!

I just scored a 175 on PT126.

Hi all,

I am really frustrated with my results recently. I started off at 122 (I know it's a bad score) but I've been studying for the past few months and I'm only reached at 135. I'm trying to write the LSAT in February.

Do you think it's possible to get 160 in 2 months? I try to study at least 3 hours a day consistently and I do see improvement.

Does anyone else have other tips? Maybe different resources? I really want to get my score to 160 because most Canadian schools need 160.

I was planning to apply the 2026 cycle, though I received a disappointing score on my October LSAT (low 160s), which was ~5-6 points below my PT scores. I took the November test and will receive the results on Wednesday. I have a compelling story, significant work experience at a well known non-profit related to my field of interest, and stellar LORs. For the T14 schools that I'm targeting, my grades are somewhat low (3.7), though it's from an HYPS undergrad and my transcript has a clear upward trajectory and a 4.0 senior year. Additionally, I'm URM, LGBTQ, and disabled. I'm also applying to PhD programs in humanities, ultimately hoping to do a JD/PhD. However, I'm thinking it may make sense to apply for the PhD this cycle, begin the PhD fall 2026 and then apply to law school in one of the following two cycles with (hopefully) a higher LSAT and doctoral coursework under the belt. I'm planning to make a final decision about the cycle after getting the Nov. results this week and tentatively planning on moving ahead with applying if I receive a 165-167+. Part of me is hesitant to try if I receive below 170, especially given that the median scores at these schools are on the rise and this is shaping up to be the most competitive cycle ever.

Regarding the joint degree, I'm less concerned about doing them at the same university and more so attending the strongest and best fit programs for each degree.

Thoughts on how to make this decision? Could it be helpful to speak with an admissions consultant/expert?

Hello, I am looking for a study group who is planning on taking the November and or January LSAT for Fall 2023. I have been studying for almost a month (would have been more but its on and off). I am currently living in Spokane Washington :)

Hey all- excited about this new feature as I used 7SAGE to teach myself the LSAT and go from a low 150s diagnostic to a 180 on test day after a few months of studying.

I’ve been tutoring the LSAT for 4+ years, and now that October scores are out I have a few open slots, so I’m looking to take on a few motivated students for the next few months who want to achieve success on the LSAT. I received a 180 5 years ago and have been tutoring for about 4 years. This test opened a lot of doors for me, and I am very passionate about helping my students achieve their goals.

Discounted Rates for New Students:

• ⁠Free 30-minute strategy session

• ⁠$75/hr single session

• ⁠5 hours - $350

• ⁠10 hours - $600

• ⁠15+ - Flexible rates

My focus is on building strong approaches and eliminating bad habits by reviewing PTs together, breaking down problem sets, and giving feedback/tips throughout the week so progress continues between sessions.

Recently, I passed the bar exam and am taking some time off before work, so I have a lot of availability for tutoring and recent experience and tips related to intense studying. Feel free to reach out for tutoring or advice.

If you’re aiming for more consistency and higher scores, or just want some tips feel free to reach out, I’d be happy to help!

Email- 180lsatteacher@gmail.com

SCORE BELOW

Is there a way to get access to the summaries that are posted at the end of various lessons? I would love to print them out instead of navigating them on Miro website... I really do not like that format.

Hello,

I am reaching out because my Lawhub account is about to expire. I spoke with LSAC and they said that any prompt I am receiving about LawHub on a third-party vendor site should be addressed with the third-party vendor.

I am receiving a LAWHUB ERROR! message next to my profile icon on 7sage and I want to be sure that when this expires, this will not impact my current profile with 7sage. LSAC has informed me that upon expiration I will have to generate a new LawHub account and I cannot renew before the expiration.

Am I about to lose all of my progress with 7sage that I have tracked? What are next steps? As this expires next week for me.

My drill screen has just shrunk 50% smaller and it's difficult to read. Can we fix this back to full screen? Thanks

Hi everyone, I've been listening to your feedback over the past few days and I want to let you know that we've started working on a way for you to transfer your data from classic to new 7Sage.

The most important data is PrepTest data and you can already manually import those to new 7Sage. It takes about 4 minutes per manual PT import.

In approximately 4-6 weeks (hoping for 4!), I expect that we'll have built a way to automatically import 3-digit PrepTest data from classic to new 7Sage.

In another 4-6 weeks, automatic import of 3-digit Drilling data from classic to new 7Sage should be available too.

In the meantime, I just want to emphasize that you do NOT have to switch to using the new 7Sage. The classic site, i.e., this site, will continue to work just as before.

Updated link: https://7sage.com/users/settings/import

Philosopher: You’re an idiot. Even if we care about nature, banning fossil fuels would lead to massive deforestation as manufacturers turn to biofuels as a substitute. So we shouldn’t listen to your smooth-brained policy proposal.

Environmentalist: Ad hominem! Ad hominem! And you call yourself a philosopher.

Philosopher: No. I didn’t commit the ad hominem fallacy.

Environmentalist: But you insulted me and said I was wrong.

Philosopher: No, no, my illogical friend. There’s nuance to this. We commit the ad hominem fallacy when we attack the source of a claim as support for why that claim is wrong.

For example -

You smell like a cesspit. So, we shouldn’t listen to you when you tell us to use eco-friendly soap.

Here, I’m citing to your stench as a reason to reject your recommendation. But the idea that we should use eco-friendly soap should be evaluated on its own merit. What are the pros and cons of eco-friendly soap? That’s what we should consider, not your distasteful body odor. That’s why this argument commits an ad hominem fallacy.

However, consider my original statements.

You’re an idiot. Even if we care about nature, banning fossil fuels would lead to massive deforestation as manufacturers turn to biofuels as a substitute. So we shouldn’t listen to your smooth-brained policy proposal.

Notice that even though I am calling you an idiot, and even though I label your proposal as smooth-brained, I’m not saying that we shouldn’t listen to you because you’re a smooth-brained idiot. I rely instead on the effects of banning fossil fuels to support my conclusion. My comments on your lack of intelligence are simply fun add-ons that don’t play a logical role in my argument. So I’m not committing the ad hominem fallacy.

Environmentalist: Interesting. I think I get it.

Philosopher: Let me give you another example.

Environmentalist: Thanks, but I’m pretty sure I und–

Philosopher: You’re a stinky, mouth-breathing dunce. Ad hominem?

Environmentalist: …Yes?

Philosopher: Ha! Trick question – it wasn’t even an argument. So calling the claim logically flawed wouldn’t even make sense.

Environmentalist: I see. Well, I have to get–

Philosopher: If I had said, for example, that we shouldn’t listen to you because you’re a stinky, mouth-breathing loser and nobody likes you, then that would have been an ad hominem fallacy.

Environmentalist: Thanks, I got it.

Philosopher: You’re welcome, you foul-smelling fool. Not ad hominem!

Hi all,

I've been struggling with staying focused even for small drills for extended periods of time (30min lol) periods of time and it is genuinely so frustrating. Anyone else have trouble with focus? I get distracted so easily it makes me doubt myself and future career prospects :(

I just scored a 175 on PT126.

I have been doing 2 sections a day (1 LR 1 RC) in preparation for the Jan LSAT. Just this morning when I went to do my sections the whole layout had changed. The questions and stimulus is in a small box in the middle of my screen leaving much open space. Also all the text is super condensed. It threw me off ngl. Is this how the LSAT will frfr look on test day. I plan to take it in a testing center.

When reviewing questions outside of blind review, I can't see my actual take (the answers I eliminated and which ones I kept open). All I see is the unmarked question.