[I am posting on behalf of a 7Sage user. Please feel free to leave your comments below. Thank you for your help!]

"Hello!

Could you please offer some advice as to how I can best utilize 7sages premium Curriculum to get better at games? Because I think there is a study plan available within the account to aid me in getting better at my accuracy, comprehension, and consequently my timing in games. I’m doing fine in reading comprehension and logic reasoning, but for some reason I’m not doing good enough in games yet. So I need to somehow customize and tailor my learning in a way where I can learn games thoroughly. I can do ordering games fine and the type with the conditional chains but sometimes grouping and hybrids take a while for me to understand. I need something I can follow along with and track my progress for LG. So far I can do almost two games in the 35 minutes. I thought about starting with the first prep test and working my way up on games throughout all the sections and then hopefully by like the 60s, I would be good enough to start timing myself but someone told me that was not the best way to proceed because games from the earlier prep tests are not a reliable indicator of how games are today. So if that’s not the appropriate way to learn and drill games, then do you have any suggestions for me? Do you have any advice for me please?

Thank you"

How do we implement meaningful increases in LR? I'm halfway through fool-proofing for LG & try to do Harder RCs every 2 days, but usually just look at the hardest questions for LR from the Problem Sets page under untimed conditions. It feels like this is the wrong approach; so how do I improve and cut down the errors?

Y’all. Good luck for real lmao cuz that was no joke 😩💀.

LR was harder than the 80s imo.

LG was easy. Last game was tough but solvable.

RC was denseeeee

Good luck yall ♥️🙏🏼

Having a breakdown. im supposed to test today

Hi everyone. As I am studying for the LSAT, I am beginning to get concerned for what lies ahead. I originally planned to take the LSAT flex in January but this had to get pushed back for personal reasons. Now, as I am still studying and struggling, I do not think February will be the best option for me. Because I have only been in the cycle since the start of the flex, I am really concerned if I couldn't make the LSAT flex in April, and then they begin re-introducing the regular LSAT. Anyone have any ideas on future lsats for this next cycle post-April? Thanks.

i didnt bomb it but definitely not my best

idk maybe bc i was running on 6 hrs of sleep

but still not what i was looking forward to before my test on tuesday

I recently took PT37 as a "flex-converted" prep test. After BRing, I viewed my results on desktop and everything seemed fine.

However, after trying to view my score on the 7sage phone app via the grader feature, I ended up grading the Flex converted test as a normal prep-test by mistake. This dropped my score by a lot, and is messing with my analytics. I've tried to reverse the test back to a flex grading, but no such luck.

Any advice on correcting this? Thanks!

As we head into test day tomorrow, and as someone taking this exam for the second time, the single most important piece of advice I can give you is:

Do. Not. Panic.

The second you panic this test has won. The second you panic you've thrown all your months of studying out the window - all your hundreds of hours blind reviewing and fool proofing lost to anxiety and franticness. You know exactly when you've spent too long on a question and need to move on. You've done the work, now trust that work to carry you across the finish line.

Make sure you have your scratch paper ready (5 pieces), your ID, your favorite pens and a bottle of water. Log onto the proctorU site early and run your diagnostics one more time. Make sure you use the bathroom because once you sit down, you're not allowed to get back up. Clear your mind and calm yourself.

Your proctor will open a chat box with you. They'll ask to see your ID and your pieces of blank paper back and front. They will ask you to show them your testing area, so be ready to carry your laptop around.

During the test, the timer is your guide, not your enemy. It's actually showing how long you have until this nightmare is over. You just need to hold on for 35 minutes at a time. You have about :30 seconds between each section - USE IT. Straighten your back, drink your water and mentally steady yourself. Two hours will fly by. At the end your proctor will ask you to rip up your scratch paper, which I was more than happy to do.

Lastly, take it easy. We are not all going to get a 165+ (I know I'm definitely not). But more than likely, you WILL get a score good enough to get into a law school. You WILL finish your applications this cycle, and you WILL enroll somewhere. And for those of us balancing the rigors of study with a full time job, we finally won't be stretched so thin across emails, projects, and LSAT review. What a relief.

You'll do great. Now keep calm and fucking crush this test.

January has turned out to be the largest test administration of this cycle with over 40,000 people registered and as such there are many first time test takers as well as people that have taken a Flex test previously but are still not too familiar with the format so I thought I would create a post.

Here are some important things to know:

There are multiple different versions of the test. In some of the previous Flex administrations we have seen more than 50 different versions of the test.

Order does not matter. So all those posting their order in the January discussion thread, you are not helping anyone nor are you potentially trying to gauge your perception of how well you did. You may even be accidently hurting others who are looking to fellow test takers to get a better idea of how they may have done on the test When you post that you had the order of: LR- LG- RC and you write about how how LR was the hardest section you have ever had maybe the section you had was difficult but someone else who had the exact same order as you had a different and easier LR section and now they think that the questions went right over their head and are cancelling their test.

There is multiple different curves- Depending on content, there will be at least several different curves. Previous estimates on past curves have ranged from -7 to -10

All Flex tests are non disclosed so we won't see questions or really know how we did

Here is what we can and can not discuss on the January discussion thread:

We can discuss topics. You could list the topics of the games or RC passages for example.

You can say something like I found the questions about dinosaurs, Plato, and birds flying to be the trickiest questions or questions you thought you got wrong

By listing topics you may be able to find other test takers who had the same section as you and get their perspective as to overall difficulty, hardest questions ect though you can't say something like I answered question #15 with B, did you?

We can't discuss game type or question type

Will be taking the january test and my RAM is 97% instead of 90%.

How do i change it?

Hello there,

Could someone provide me with a condensed analysis of the 'bridging' concept of Necessary Assumptions. I'm struggling on identifying these Q-types and I'm missing a great deal of NA questions on PTs unfortunately.

Also I'm looking for examples or a PT that may have more than the usual amount of these. Could anyone point me in the right direction?

Muchas Gracias

Okay so I can see why E could be the correct answer. But I just wasn't sure whether there was both government inaction (maybe the government is just but they are acting) and he did everything in good faith.

I chose B. I took a contrapositive of the principle and it seemed to fit. Maybe that's not the right thing to do, but I was between B and E and I wasn't sure about E.

Apologies if this has already been addressed but wondering whether the underline tool that we have here on 7sage is a feature on the LSAT flex?

Thanks!

howdy all, I wanted to let people know how this admissions cycle has gone for me with hopes of shedding some light for others. It's been a very wonky cycle so far. I sent in 18 applications just after Oct 23, right after I got the results for my 169. I applied to all t14 + UCLA, UGA, Emory, and Notre Dame. I was expecting with my "super" soft of being a veteran + being a splitter at a lot of schools or at least hitting their median LSAT that I'd be a shoe in (haha it's actually "shoo in") at a lot of schools, but this has not been the case.

Here are the results of this weird cycle:

Georgetown - waitlist

Notre Dame - accepted

UGA - accepted

Harvard - denied

Cornell - denied

U Penn - waitlist

Waiting still from 12 schools.

Huh? Waitlisted at #7 Penn and denied at #13 Cornell? Then waitlisted at #14 Georgetown?? Here's a link to a very helpful and anxiety-lowering video from Spivey Consulting on youtube she basically explains what's going on and it helped me to manage my stress better.

I hope this info helps some of you, I wanted to be open about my application stats and my results, hopefully other ppl will benefit from this.

Can you use lined paper on the LSAT Flex? Or only unlined? SOS, I literally have no printer paper.

I am having a hard time understanding why AC E is better than D. I also do not understand what makes B wrong.

Does anyone know when LSAC will release the June and July LSAT test dates?

Is there a way to make my own problem set and save it for later, similar to core curriculum problem sets?

Hi! I'm waiting on one other recommender to submit their letter, but would like to submit my application. I know for graduate school, they allow you to submit your application before having all your LoRs on file. Does LSAC do the same thing? Or should I wait for the last letter to be uploaded?

Thank you! :)

I heard there were problems with catalina. Does anyone know big sur is okay

For whatever reason I'm really bad at mid-level assumption questions, like "what follows if this is assumed."

Does anyone have any advice?

This book has changed my perspective on LR.

I highly recommend. This book, coupled with the core curriculum, is gold.

I finally found myself getting the correct answers almost automatically.

The trick : even though the book is written in "layman's terms" - I made a Quizlet set for each chapter. This will help you tremendously if you're struggling with LR.

Hey guys, I just wanted to say good luck to everyone taking the Flex this week! I’m taking mine tomorrow, and I can’t thank the 7sage community enough for helping me through studying for it. You got this!

I got this wrong both in time and BR, but now I think I understand the reasoning. Can someone out there confirm or correct my logic?

Stim: 1. if scandal occurs and voters' blame is shared across 1 or more parties then incumbents are re-elected

2. if scandal occurs and voters' blame is on 1 party, then regardless of who challenges, incumbents are not re-elected

3. Independent of the presence of scandals, incumbents run at similar rates.

Ques: whats the principle which accounts for this?

Ans: (E) Admin Note: I deleted Answer Choice E as it is against our Forum Rules to post the Answer Choices on the Forum.

Ans trans: If blame is shared across multiple parties then it is the fault of individuals not of the party, but if one party gets the blame then party ought to pay price (ie not re-electing it's incumbents).

Thanks in advance for the help!

Hello, In light of the January exam I am hosting a free zoom session to go over some of the language ques everyone should be aware of prior to the test, hopefully I can help with pre test jitters. I'll be hosting tomorrow 12 PM EST via Zoom

Time: Jan 16, 2021 12:00 PM Eastern Time (US and Canada)

Join Zoom Meeting

https://us04web.zoom.us/j/75565555850?pwd=M2M0eU9YRmQ4ZlVUbGpibDZkdWxMUT09

Meeting ID: 755 6555 5850

Passcode: Jc24v4

Hope to see you there, Good Luck!