... consensus (though not everywhere) that threemonths is adequate time to study ... , taking enough PTs all in threemonths (without severe burnout), and expecting ...
... , I knew I wanted a 170. I read many online forums ... people suggesting that 3-6 months of studying was enough. Two ... 't reach my goal of 170, I won't be able ... several more months. This April, I finally got the 170. Three years of ...
... , I was PT'ing high 170's, when I started to ... severe burnout. On my last three PT's before the December ... I took a break for threemonths and started back studying in ...
I studied full time for threemonths and scored 160 after a PT Avg of 167 and BR 171. The official score was just a point above my diagnostic. I really believe I can break 170, but this is pretty disappointing. Should I re-take in October or November?
... any on any of my three tests; take a look ... section, and often skipped three or four questions that were ... up the two or three questions that I would ... my PT average was 170+ for months, and then I underperformed ... the November test was only three weeks away, and I ...
... for a 150? Or a 170? Again, it'll totally depend ... us are at least 9 months in and in some cases ... me), we're approaching 18 months. Again, this is relative to ... in the next two to threemonths. We're here to support ...
Also, there are more people on this site alone that have been studying for more than threemonths and still haven't cracked 160 than there are people who went from sub 140 to over 170 in less time.
... said, you may find that threemonths is not enough time. It ... will probably take you about threemonths to work through the curriculum ... />
170 takes time. That's a big jump for threemonths, even ...